Hope for Hyundai? China Agrees to Ignore South Korea's Missiles

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

When it comes to the positively frosty relationship between China and South Korea, this is the part of the movie where the two countries bump into each other at the bookstore and realize they should work out their troubles instead of giving each other the silent treatment. You know, for the kids.

For South Korea, China’s decision to warm up the relationship — which soured after the jittery country placed U.S.-supplied defensive missiles on its soil — is the best news its auto manufacturing sector has heard in ages. Perhaps soon it won’t be frowned upon to own a Hyundai or Kia in Beijing.

As Reuters reported yesterday, both countries have agreed to patch things up and move past last year’s decision to install THAAD anti-missile batteries in South Korea. The mobile missile launchers are designed as an extra level of protection against possible aggression from the nuclear-armed North Korea.

China, however, found the missiles to be particularly provocative. Not because China remains a tepid ally of North Korea’s authoritarian regime, but because it felt THAAD’s powerful radars could peek into its airspace. In response, South Korea’s tourism industry, as well as its manufacturing and entertainment industries, took a heavy hit in China.

Owning or buying a Korean car quickly became something to avoid. With a market as large as China’s, that spelled extra turmoil during a troubled time at Hyundai Motor Company. The company’s U.S. sales have tapered off, leaving the automaker scrambling to build new crossovers in an attempt to rekindle the fire.

According to The Korea Herald, Chinese Hyundai sales have fallen 37.2 percent over the first nine months of 2017. Kia sales fell 40.0 percent. That’s a big chunk taken out of the automaker’s global volume.

“We see a chance to recover sales on a gradual basis if the official ‘normalization of ties’ leads to easing of anti-South Korean sentiment,” a Hyundai official told the publication. “In the case of the automobile market, the Chinese government actually did not block consumption of South Korean cars, unlike in the tourism industry.”

For Ssangyong Motor Company, the move could mean its shelved joint Chinese plant plans might get a rethink. You’ll recall Ssangyong began looking at entering the American market after groundwork for a China plant went nowhere. (After last week’s board of directors vote, there’s no still word on whether we’ll see a new brand sold on this side of the Pacific.)

“We will have to wait and see how our partner will react to the thawing relations between Seoul and Beijing,” a Ssangyong official told The Korea Herald.

[Image: Hyundai]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 7 comments
  • Cleek Cleek on Oct 31, 2017

    I understand your concern, but Hyundai does have a good portion of their supply chain and mfg in the US. Elantras are made in AL as well as KR. Not sure about the GT though. https://www.hyundaiusa.com/new-thinking/built-in-usa.aspx

  • Jpolicke Jpolicke on Nov 01, 2017

    Let’s suppose Kim decided to act on his fantasy of conquering South Korea, and the USAF lost all the keys to the bombers and didn’t vaporize Pyongyang. The Norks would triumphantly enter the Hyundai offices and find.. nothing. The bank accounts would contain nothing, the contents having been wired out of the country days before. Same with all the intellectual property, having been FTPd to Hyundai’s new world headquarters somewhere in the USA where they had just chartered themselves as a US corporation. They’d be just down the road from the LG and Samsung world HQs. Realtors would be working feverishly to find homes for all the Korean employees that just arrived as refugees. Various US states would be in a bidding war to entice H/K to locate new assembly plants while the Norks try to figure out how to reverse engineer and build cars in the stripped facilities that they could only sell to China.

  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could be made in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well.
  • Groza George I don’t care about GM’s anything. They have not had anything of interest or of reasonable quality in a generation and now solely stay on business to provide UAW retirement while they slowly move production to Mexico.
  • Arthur Dailey We have a lease coming due in October and no intention of buying the vehicle when the lease is up.Trying to decide on a replacement vehicle our preferences are the Maverick, Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5 or CX-30.Unfortunately both the Maverick and Subaru are thin on the ground. Would prefer a Maverick with the hybrid, but the wife has 2 'must haves' those being heated seats and blind spot monitoring. That requires a factory order on the Maverick bringing Canadian price in the mid $40k range, and a delivery time of TBD. For the Subaru it looks like we would have to go up 2 trim levels to get those and that also puts it into the mid $40k range.Therefore are contemplating take another 2 or 3 year lease. Hoping that vehicle supply and prices stabilize and purchasing a hybrid or electric when that lease expires. By then we will both be retired, so that vehicle could be a 'forever car'. And an increased 'carbon tax' just kicked in this week in most of Canada. Prices are currently $1.72 per litre. Which according to my rough calculations is approximately $5.00 per gallon in US currency.Any recommendations would be welcomed.
  • Eric Wait! They're moving? Mexico??!!
  • GrumpyOldMan All modern road vehicles have tachometers in RPM X 1000. I've often wondered if that is a nanny-state regulation to prevent drivers from confusing it with the speedometer. If so, the Ford retro gauges would appear to be illegal.
Next