QOTD: What's the Worst Utility Vehicle of the Past 10 Years?

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

Utility vehicles have been a hot ticket personal transport item for some time, much to the delight of OEMs and their shareholders. As the definition around what should qualify as “utility” became more and more blurred during this (presently, CUV) craze, inevitably some entries missed the mark and floundered. Perhaps a redesign was in the cards if the manufacturer felt confident, or a product cancellation if it didn’t.

Either way, recent examples of bad utility vehicles are our subject today. What’s your pick for the worst utility vehicle of the past decade?

We’re only considering recent utility vehicles, because we’d surely end up down AMC International Harvester Scout Bronco II street in short order. The rules are just two:

  1. The vehicle must have been available between model years 2008 and 2017.
  2. It must be a North American market offering.

There aren’t limitations further than those, but we leave it to you to keep the topic specifically on utility vehicles. Have a look at the selection below, which will surely put your mind in the gutter right place for this question.

That’s right, my personal pick for worst recent utility vehicle is the Acura ZDX. Labeled by its designer as a “4-door luxury sports coupe” (eyeroll), Acura intended the vehicle to straddle the lines of coupe, sedan, and SUV. The ZDX appeared in the Acura product offering pamphlets between 2010 and 2013. Though the ZDX is of the same era and idea as the similarly ugly Honda Crosstour, the two vehicles are not mechanically related. The Crosstour was an Accord sibling, while the ZDX is of MDX lineage.

Though the familiar Honda 3.7-liter V6 provided 300 horsepower, a hefty curb weight of over 4,400 pounds kept sporting pretensions far away. With regard to utility, cargo capacity with all seats in place was 27.5 cubic feet. For comparison, a much smaller Ford Escape provides 34.3 cubes, while a Lexus RX350 has an even 40.

All the inconvenient packaging didn’t come cheap, as in 2010 the introductory price was just over $46,000 (the RX350 AWD started at $39,025). It was available in a wide variety of colors that included black, grey, silver, and white. As a result, Acura shifted just 7,191 units over seven calendar years. Many a sad ZDX languished on lots through 2014, and a final two were sold in 2015.

Fifteen years from now, tune in when Rare Rides presents the Acura ZDX. For now, tell us your pick for worst utility vehicle.

[Images: Land Rover, The Truth About Cars]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 141 comments
  • Whitworth Whitworth on Sep 20, 2017

    Jeep Renegade. Built on the Fiat 500 platform which takes honors in being one of the most unreliable new cars you can possibly buy.

  • SuperCarEnthusiast SuperCarEnthusiast on Sep 21, 2017

    The Patriot was the America answer to the Mercedes G Class AMG vehicle. The only difference is around $200K, big engine and luxury packages!

  • Jeff Self driving cars are not ready for prime time.
  • Lichtronamo Watch as the non-us based automakers shift more production to Mexico in the future.
  • 28-Cars-Later " Electrek recently dug around in Tesla’s online parts catalog and found that the windshield costs a whopping $1,900 to replace.To be fair, that’s around what a Mercedes S-Class or Rivian windshield costs, but the Tesla’s glass is unique because of its shape. It’s also worth noting that most insurance plans have glass replacement options that can make the repair a low- or zero-cost issue. "Now I understand why my insurance is so high despite no claims for years and about 7,500 annual miles between three cars.
  • AMcA My theory is that that when the Big 3 gave away the store to the UAW in the last contract, there was a side deal in which the UAW promised to go after the non-organized transplant plants. Even the UAW understands that if the wage differential gets too high it's gonna kill the golden goose.
  • MKizzy Why else does range matter? Because in the EV advocate's dream scenario of a post-ICE future, the average multi-car household will find itself with more EVs in their garages and driveways than places to plug them in or the capacity to charge then all at once without significant electrical upgrades. Unless each vehicle has enough range to allow for multiple days without plugging in, fighting over charging access in multi-EV households will be right up there with finances for causes of domestic strife.
Next