With the Model 3 Out of the Bag, Tesla Investors Worry (While Musk Won't Stop Talking About 'Hell')

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The production Tesla Model 3, revealed in full at a Friday evening handover ceremony, is an impressive vehicle, but it’s also the California automaker’s most important vehicle. With 220 miles of range in stripped-down base trim, or 310 miles for the starting sum of $44,ooo (the only version available at launch), the curvaceous sedan has no shortage of fans. It’s also facing no shortage of threats.

The company’s future as a mass-market “disruptor” of the American automotive landscape hinges on the Model 3’s trouble-free production at Tesla’s Fremont assembly plant, as well as timely deliveries to the half-million reservation holders. Unforeseen quality issues, a breakdown in the supply chain, or worker strife could all conspire to give the vehicle — and company — a black eye.

After a year spent giving investors everything they wished for, the company’s once-skyrocketing stock isn’t on the same firm ground as before. The first trading day after the event reflected this. Investors are nervous about a number of things: the model’s easily inflatable price, the company’s extremely lofty production target, and CEO Elon Musk’s repeated mentions of “hell.”

Share prices, which hovered around $346 on Thursday morning, fell off as the big reveal drew near. At Monday’s close, the value of a Tesla share sat just above $323, with early Tuesday trading pushing its value below $320.

“We believe the Model 3 was as good as or better than expected, and pricing was as expected with considerable initial upsell. That said, the rubber now hits the road, and the fundamental questions remain unanswered,” wrote Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi in a message to clients Monday. He added, “CEO Elon Musk sounds increasingly squeamish about the production ramp,” referencing Musk’s message to employees, in which he told them to prepare for “production hell.”

That wasn’t the only mention of the heavy lifting required to reach an output of 5,000 vehicles per week by the end of the year. During Friday’s event, Musk made another mention of employees facing “at least six months of manufacturing hell.”

Also Monday, a group of Tesla workers sent an open letter to the company’s board of directors, seeking safety data and wage transparency. For at least the past year the workers have waged a campaign to unionize the Fremont plant’s workforce — something Musk hopes to avoid.

Outside the factory, Model 3 buyers not currently in the half-million-strong queue face a long wait for their vehicle. Musk claims that, because of the backlog of reservations, new orders won’t be filled until late 2018 at the earliest. Any slowdown at Fremont would push deliveries back even further.

The “upsell” mentioned by Sacconaghi refers to a raft of packages and options capable of inflating the Model 3’s base price of $35,000 (before federal tax credit) to nearly $60,000. Any paint color besides black warrants an extra $1,000, while tech and luxury items add thousands more.

On Saturday, following the Model 3’s production debut, Musk tweeted a response to a Tesla aficionado’s question about a high-performance Model 3. A quicker Model 3 (Long Range variants hit 60 mph in 5.1 seconds), will probably arrive in the middle of next year, Musk said.

“Focus now is on getting out of Model 3 production hell,” he tweeted. “More versions = deeper in hell.”

The same Saturday exchange saw the CEO speak candidly about his mental health, describing in one tweet his “unrelenting stress.” In another, Musk claimed to suffer from bipolar disorder, adding, “Maybe not medically tho. Dunno.” He went on to suggest his mood swings could be organic reactions to real events, summing up his situation at Tesla by stating, “If you buy a ticket to hell, it isn’t fair to blame hell…”

[Sources: CNBC, Marketwatch] [Image: Tesla]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 63 comments
  • Derekson Derekson on Aug 01, 2017

    I'm sure Tesla's workforce that is already complaining about working conditions and working to unionize is ready to weather "production hell".

  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Aug 01, 2017

    "Unforeseen quality issues, a breakdown in the supply chain, or worker strife could all conspire to give the vehicle — and company — a black eye." This is true for any mfr, but Tesla would feel it more acutely. All the 'hell' talk has me wondering what's going on inside the plant. I suspect the production line is held together with bailing wire and duct tape - figuratively, of course. - Perhaps the assembly instructions and training aren't yet complete. - Perhaps the parts aren't fitting together right due to design, documentation, or supplier quality issues. - Perhaps the automated equipment isn't quite fine-tuned yet. - Perhaps they've already identified hundreds of revisions which need to be made, but can't flush them all through their system fast enough. - Perhaps the final Cost of Goods Sold is higher than projected, and they're already trying to find ways to cut costs. So I'd consider an early Model 3 to be a decent car, but it won't be the same car (at the detail level) that they'll be shipping in 6 months. So I'm glad I have to wait a while.

    • See 3 previous
    • Mcs Mcs on Aug 02, 2017

      @JimZ I usually consider every manufacturer's first year a beta test. I admit I might be wrong, but that's my perception.

  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
  • 1995 SC No
  • Analoggrotto I hope the walls of Mary Barra's office are covered in crushed velvet.
Next