Volkswagen to Conduct 'Crisis Meeting' Over EU Cartel Allegations, BMW Plays It Cool

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Volkswagen will hold an emergency supervisory board meeting on Wednesday to discuss recent allegations that Germany’s automakers have been operating as an automotive cartel since the 1990s. Meanwhile, Daimler’s workers council is demanding answers from management as the automaker reels from a one-two-punch of collusion and emissions cheating accusations.

“I advise the car industry to clear the air now, to say what has happened, and then we can look to the future together again,” parliamentary group leader Volker Kauder, said Monday on German television. “If the antitrust violations prove true, and there’s a lot to suggest that, then one must really say the clear sentence: the rule of law also applies to the car industry.”

However, claiming there is sufficient proof to prosecute is a little premature. With the exception of a somewhat damning letter intercepted from VW, no hard evidence of collusion has been made public. Investigators are still in the early stages of the antitrust probe and have given few details as to its progress.

Regardless how true the allegations are, Germany’s automakers will still be entering damage control this summer. BMW, Daimler, and Volkswagen’s share price all took a hit on Monday morning after investors, soured by the news, sold off their shares en masse.

A large contributor to the recent cartel suspicions are the similarities between Mercedes’ recent recall of 3 million diesel vehicles and the one that led Volkswagen to disaster in 2015. It was suggested by Der Spiegel that German automakers conspired to use smaller diesel emission fluid (DEF) tanks, which resulted in the use of software-based defeat devices when the systems failed to meet emissions standards. However, the size of the tanks should be irrelevant and BMW has been quick to remind everyone that its diesel technology had passed muster — denying the company has ever involved itself in any emissions cheating.

“As a matter of principle: BMW Group vehicles are not manipulated and comply with respective legal requirements,” the company said in a statement. “Of course this also applies to diesel vehicles. The BMW Group categorically rejects accusations that Euro 6 diesel vehicles sold by the company do not provide adequate exhaust gas treatment due to AdBlue tanks that are too small.”

It’s unlikely the governmental probe will yield any fast answers, but that hasn’t prevented those affected from demanding them. According to Reuters, Daimler works council chief Michael Brecht called for an immediate investigation into the antitrust claims. Brecht stated that “workers are rightly horrified and angry” by the allegations and that consequences should result if they’re proven true.

Volkswagen’s union council had similar concerns. “Management has the duty to thoroughly inform the supervisory board. That hasn’t happened yet,” the VW works council said in an official statement. “We also expect the management board to give an explanation to the workforce. Trust in company leadership is dwindling more each day.”

A spokesperson from Volkswagen has confirmed that chairman Hans Dieter Pötsch will convene a special supervisory board meeting to the discuss the matter on Wednesday morning. Daimler has not made any plans for such a meeting, according to company spokeswoman Ute Wüest von Vellberg, but it will report its quarterly results on June 26th — and the board is likely to convene beforehand.

Presently, the only standing accusations revolve around the price fixing of various automotive parts, specifically the AdBlue diesel treatment systems. There have been no claims made that any automaker engaged in price fixing to consumers.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 6 comments
  • Stingray65 Stingray65 on Jul 24, 2017

    BMW is really sticking their necks out with such a statement, so they are either innocent or believe the evidence is really well buried.

  • Phila_DLJ Phila_DLJ on Jul 25, 2017

    What will we learn next: MB-TEX IS PEOPLE?!?

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next