Volvo XC40 Will Be Fresh, Creative, and Distinctive - Unlike Its Competitors, Volvo Says

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

There’s no denying the Volvo 40.1 concept that previewed this fall’s production XC40 appears both to be sufficiently Volvo-like and sufficiently unlike anything else.

If the actual Volvo XC40 maintains this relatively unusual design, Volvo will have a viable, eye-catching alternative to the Audi Q3, BMW X1, Infiniti QX30, and Mercedes-Benz GLA before most luxury auto brands.

As for the Q3, X1, QX30, and GLA, Volvo isn’t entirely sold on their merits.

As it stands, this subcompact luxury crossover segment is “lacking individuality and playfulness,” according to AutoCar.

Yes, playfulness.

Jaguar, a former Ford Premier Automotive Group partner of Volvo, might change all that with the E-Pace, which features the silhouette of a jaguar cub following its mother on both the windshield and in the puddle lights.

Volvo, however, has a broader stylistic vision for small luxury crossovers; more than just easter eggs or AMG GLA45 graphics. Thomas Ingenlath, senior vice president of design at Volvo, tells AutoCar, “We wanted the XC40 to be a fresh, creative and distinctive member of the Volvo line-up, allowing its drivers to put their personality in their driveway.”

Volvo will therefore supply the XC40 range with more colors — outside and in — than any Volvo in history. There’s talk of orange carpet, for instance, and rugged wood textures.

Volvo can insult its rivals’ subcompact luxury utility vehicles, even in a typically polite Swedish way. But the real reason the upcoming XC40 will need to stand out from the pack is the brand’s limited presence in the SUV/crossover market.

The second-generation XC90 was way too long in reaching the market. Though a blessing for Volvo’s U.S. dealers, even in this booming SUV/crossover market the XC90 is on track for 36 percent fewer XC90 sales in 2017 than the first-generation XC90 managed at its peak in 2004. The XC60, which became Volvo USA’s major player at the end of the first-gen XC90’s tenure, averages fewer than 19,000 U.S. sales per year. The Audi Q5, BMW X3, Lexus NX, and Mercedes-Benz GLC averaged 49,000 U.S. sales last year.

With Volvo’s passenger cars joining in with fewer than 2,200 U.S. sales per month, Volvo needs the XC40 to be more than a niche presence in a niche sector. To become a noticeable alternative to the established group of subcompact luxury crossovers, Volvo will shirk the serious and avoid the austere.

Will it work? Nah, flashy design is probably not enough. So look for Volvo to undercut its rivals’ MSRPs, as well.

[Image: Volvo Cars]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 14 comments
  • Garrett Garrett on Jul 25, 2017

    Volvo is on a roll -- every single one of their new vehicles is a huge leap forward from a style perspective, and I would gladly put one of them in my garage. Can you imagine an XC40 with the T8 hybrid system?

    • Quaquaqua Quaquaqua on Jul 25, 2017

      First you'd have to show me a Volvo that handles as well as its competition or at the very least rides like it. The new Volvos are stately and beautifully finished. But underneath it all they drive worse than a Honda. That's not good.

  • Tj21 Tj21 on Jul 26, 2017

    I love everything that Volvo is doing lately, really hoping they continue to build vehicles in Belgium or Sweden, would love an s40 one day, but not a Chinese built "entry luxury" vehicle.

  • Ltcmgm78 Just what we need to do: add more EVs that require a charging station! We own a Volt. We charge at home. We bought the Volt off-lease. We're retired and can do all our daily errands without burning any gasoline. For us this works, but we no longer have a work commute.
  • Michael S6 Given the choice between the Hornet R/T and the Alfa, I'd pick an Uber.
  • Michael S6 Nissan seems to be doing well at the low end of the market with their small cars and cuv. Competitiveness evaporates as you move up to larger size cars and suvs.
  • Cprescott As long as they infest their products with CVT's, there is no reason to buy their products. Nissan's execution of CVT's is lackluster on a good day - not dependable and bad in experience of use. The brand has become like Mitsubishi - will sell to anyone with a pulse to get financed.
  • Lorenzo I'd like to believe, I want to believe, having had good FoMoCo vehicles - my aunt's old 1956 Fairlane, 1963 Falcon, 1968 Montego - but if Jim Farley is saying it, I can't believe it. It's been said that he goes with whatever the last person he talked to suggested. That's not the kind of guy you want running a $180 billion dollar company.
Next