What Not to Say When Introducing New Pickup Truck - Mercedes-Benz X-Class Edition

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

We don’t know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, exactly what Mercedes-Benz USA has planned for the brand’s new pickup truck, the X-Class.

Importing the Nissan Navara-based Benz pickup seems doubtful. The Chicken Tax, a 25-percent tariff on imported light trucks, would bring a $43,000 X-Class’s price up to $54,000. Moreover, premium brand pickup trucks — Lincoln Blackwood and Mark LT; Cadillac Escalade EXT — have faltered in the past. The X-Class is also set to be almost entirely dependent on diesel engines, and Mercedes-Benz would almost invariably need a gas powerplant to function in North America, both from cost and emissions standpoints. Plus, Mercedes-Benz’s X-Class would be competing for a slice of a slice of America’s pickup truck pie. America’s pickup truck sector is huge, but 84 percent of it is devoted to full-size, not midsize, pickup trucks.

However, if — and it’s a big if — Mercedes-Benz either determines that importing the X-Class to the United States is viable or decides to build the X-Class in the NAFTA zone, the words of Volker Mornhinweg, Mercedes-Benz Vans’ executive vice president, might just come back to haunt the three-pointed star.

“Our clear target was excellent refinement,” Mornhinweg told AutoCar at the X-Class’s July 18 launch. “This is more a lifestyle oriented pick-up. It’s not a basic workhorse.”

Cringe.

Wince.

Gasp.

Even if a pickup truck will never be used for workhorse purposes, you must convince me it is an eminently capable pickup, first and foremost.

Thing is, the Mercedes-Benz X-Class could easily be labelled, on paper, as a workhorse. Its capabilities are in keeping with other midsize efforts. It’ll tow 7,700 pounds and accept a payload of nearly 2,300 pounds. All four corners are coil-sprung. The standard suspension (outside Europe) offers 8.7 inches of ground clearance; the X-Class can wade into water 23.6 inches deep.

The X-Class can be more than one thing, as Mercedes-Benz is keen to point out in the company’s official documents. Mercedes-Benz says the X-Class, “unites the typical traits of a pickup – robustness, functionality, strength and off-road capabilities – with the classical characteristics of a real Mercedes – design, comfort, driving dynamics and safety.”

Mercedes-Benz even points to the most basic X-Class, the Pure, as a truck for “classic robust use.” Not just classic, not just robust, but classic robust. The company release uses the word tough five times and the word robust five times, throws in a couple mentions of rugged, and makes 15 comments regarding off-road.

But as soon as executives, even a former boss of hallowed AMG such as Volker Mornhinweg, go on the record suggesting that the Mercedes-Benz X-Class is “lifestyle oriented,” an eyebrow is raised.

“Lifestyle, huh? Really now, lifestyle? This truck is not a workhorse? You’re saying it can’t work? Refinement is the number one goal? Don’t you mean to say that being loaded with one ton of cement blocks, dropped from high above by a front end loader, while bouncing around uncontrollably on a work site, is your number one goal?”

Of course, the Mercedes-Benz X-Class is a capable truck, undoubtedly comparable to the Toyota Tacoma and Chevrolet Colorado and Nissan Frontier that lead America’s midsize truck market. But you still can’t be overheard saying it’s not intended to be a workhorse.

My neighbor uses a Ford F-250 every day to tow a horse trailer or a bale elevator. He commutes in a Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD loaded with plumbing and HVAC equipment. A massive percentage of America’s truck owners don’t do that. They don’t tow ridiculously heavy loads, the trucks aren’t absolutely required for work, they don’t off-road, they might not even get dirty, and they certainly don’t ford two-foot-deep streams.

Yet America’s truck owners want trucks that can do those things, if need be. America’s truck owners want trucks that advertise their ability; that wear their capability patches on their shoulders.

Perhaps many of the 7,500 pickup trucks sold in America today won’t ever see a dirt road or a construction site. Maybe the rear end of many of those pickup trucks will never back up to a trailer hitch. The four-wheel-drive switch may never be turned. A tonneau cover will turn the bed into a trunk, a trunk that will be loaded with bicycles and paddleboards. The back seat will carry children and groceries. The dog that sits up front will be a Bichon Frise, not a Boxer.

But Mercedes-Benz just can’t tell us that’s the way it’s going to be. And now that Mercedes-Benz has, well, we find ourselves needing a truck that can carry one pickup truck in its bed while towing another up a hill of boulders.

[Images: Daimler AG]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 68 comments
  • DenverMike DenverMike on Jul 19, 2017

    At least two times the trucks with no Chicken tax?! Are you that deluded?? There's not enough pickups in the world! Realistically, a couple more. But it's their funeral if they can't compete. Many have tried and failed. Some are struggling currently!! What's a Futon or Mahindra (throwaway trucks) got to offer other than a very low, cut-throat price and 10 year warranty? Both a recipe for disaster. Drop the Chicken tax and most of the "missing" handful global pickups won't even bother trying. The US is different than any other market. We're too hung up on "resale value" for one. If a global pickup maker is considering the US market (after the chicken tax is gone or using a loophole workaround) and licking their chop over the juicy fullsize pickup segment, they're only fooling themselves. Here midsize pickups have to compete with many car/SUV segments, other midsize pickups and occasionally fullsize 1/2 tons. More pickup competition is always good for consumers, as long as they're not expecting a reduction in the price of current pickup offerings. Is anyone paying *less* for pickups now that the Colorado/Canyon came back? Except for GM fullsize pickups that saw a drop, aren't all actual transaction prices of pickups up since they arrived??

    • See 1 previous
    • Vulpine Vulpine on Jul 20, 2017

      Based on what I've been able to discover about the Mahindra, it is anything BUT a "throwaway truck." Rather, it is a direct descendant of the Willys Jeep, having been licensed in perpetuity back when Jeep was a Kaiser brand, shortly after WWII. In fact, the Mahindra is more Jeep than the American Jeep, because it's kept most of what made the Willys Jeep what it was. I do agree that we'd probably see only a handful of new truck models enter the US... there are still safety and emissions regulations that have to be followed, but GM and Fiat specifically have at least one model they could bring in without pricing them out of their market without that tax... It's not the mid-sized trucks they'd be competing with, it would be the compact market that is currently OWNED by CUVs.

  • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Jul 20, 2017

    “This is more a lifestyle oriented pick-up. It’s not a basic workhorse.” That would be like Marchionne saying the Jeep Wrangler isn't an off-road vehicle or the Demon isn't a dragster or Ferrari's aren't meant to be driven fast. Why don't they just say it is a badge engineered Nissan......... That would be just as effective as a marketing tool.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next