What Not to Say When Introducing New Pickup Truck - Mercedes-Benz X-Class Edition

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

We don’t know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, exactly what Mercedes-Benz USA has planned for the brand’s new pickup truck, the X-Class.

Importing the Nissan Navara-based Benz pickup seems doubtful. The Chicken Tax, a 25-percent tariff on imported light trucks, would bring a $43,000 X-Class’s price up to $54,000. Moreover, premium brand pickup trucks — Lincoln Blackwood and Mark LT; Cadillac Escalade EXT — have faltered in the past. The X-Class is also set to be almost entirely dependent on diesel engines, and Mercedes-Benz would almost invariably need a gas powerplant to function in North America, both from cost and emissions standpoints. Plus, Mercedes-Benz’s X-Class would be competing for a slice of a slice of America’s pickup truck pie. America’s pickup truck sector is huge, but 84 percent of it is devoted to full-size, not midsize, pickup trucks.

However, if — and it’s a big if — Mercedes-Benz either determines that importing the X-Class to the United States is viable or decides to build the X-Class in the NAFTA zone, the words of Volker Mornhinweg, Mercedes-Benz Vans’ executive vice president, might just come back to haunt the three-pointed star.

“Our clear target was excellent refinement,” Mornhinweg told AutoCar at the X-Class’s July 18 launch. “This is more a lifestyle oriented pick-up. It’s not a basic workhorse.”

Cringe.

Wince.

Gasp.

Even if a pickup truck will never be used for workhorse purposes, you must convince me it is an eminently capable pickup, first and foremost.

Thing is, the Mercedes-Benz X-Class could easily be labelled, on paper, as a workhorse. Its capabilities are in keeping with other midsize efforts. It’ll tow 7,700 pounds and accept a payload of nearly 2,300 pounds. All four corners are coil-sprung. The standard suspension (outside Europe) offers 8.7 inches of ground clearance; the X-Class can wade into water 23.6 inches deep.

The X-Class can be more than one thing, as Mercedes-Benz is keen to point out in the company’s official documents. Mercedes-Benz says the X-Class, “unites the typical traits of a pickup – robustness, functionality, strength and off-road capabilities – with the classical characteristics of a real Mercedes – design, comfort, driving dynamics and safety.”

Mercedes-Benz even points to the most basic X-Class, the Pure, as a truck for “classic robust use.” Not just classic, not just robust, but classic robust. The company release uses the word tough five times and the word robust five times, throws in a couple mentions of rugged, and makes 15 comments regarding off-road.

But as soon as executives, even a former boss of hallowed AMG such as Volker Mornhinweg, go on the record suggesting that the Mercedes-Benz X-Class is “lifestyle oriented,” an eyebrow is raised.

“Lifestyle, huh? Really now, lifestyle? This truck is not a workhorse? You’re saying it can’t work? Refinement is the number one goal? Don’t you mean to say that being loaded with one ton of cement blocks, dropped from high above by a front end loader, while bouncing around uncontrollably on a work site, is your number one goal?”

Of course, the Mercedes-Benz X-Class is a capable truck, undoubtedly comparable to the Toyota Tacoma and Chevrolet Colorado and Nissan Frontier that lead America’s midsize truck market. But you still can’t be overheard saying it’s not intended to be a workhorse.

My neighbor uses a Ford F-250 every day to tow a horse trailer or a bale elevator. He commutes in a Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD loaded with plumbing and HVAC equipment. A massive percentage of America’s truck owners don’t do that. They don’t tow ridiculously heavy loads, the trucks aren’t absolutely required for work, they don’t off-road, they might not even get dirty, and they certainly don’t ford two-foot-deep streams.

Yet America’s truck owners want trucks that can do those things, if need be. America’s truck owners want trucks that advertise their ability; that wear their capability patches on their shoulders.

Perhaps many of the 7,500 pickup trucks sold in America today won’t ever see a dirt road or a construction site. Maybe the rear end of many of those pickup trucks will never back up to a trailer hitch. The four-wheel-drive switch may never be turned. A tonneau cover will turn the bed into a trunk, a trunk that will be loaded with bicycles and paddleboards. The back seat will carry children and groceries. The dog that sits up front will be a Bichon Frise, not a Boxer.

But Mercedes-Benz just can’t tell us that’s the way it’s going to be. And now that Mercedes-Benz has, well, we find ourselves needing a truck that can carry one pickup truck in its bed while towing another up a hill of boulders.

[Images: Daimler AG]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 68 comments
  • DenverMike DenverMike on Jul 19, 2017

    At least two times the trucks with no Chicken tax?! Are you that deluded?? There's not enough pickups in the world! Realistically, a couple more. But it's their funeral if they can't compete. Many have tried and failed. Some are struggling currently!! What's a Futon or Mahindra (throwaway trucks) got to offer other than a very low, cut-throat price and 10 year warranty? Both a recipe for disaster. Drop the Chicken tax and most of the "missing" handful global pickups won't even bother trying. The US is different than any other market. We're too hung up on "resale value" for one. If a global pickup maker is considering the US market (after the chicken tax is gone or using a loophole workaround) and licking their chop over the juicy fullsize pickup segment, they're only fooling themselves. Here midsize pickups have to compete with many car/SUV segments, other midsize pickups and occasionally fullsize 1/2 tons. More pickup competition is always good for consumers, as long as they're not expecting a reduction in the price of current pickup offerings. Is anyone paying *less* for pickups now that the Colorado/Canyon came back? Except for GM fullsize pickups that saw a drop, aren't all actual transaction prices of pickups up since they arrived??

    • See 1 previous
    • Vulpine Vulpine on Jul 20, 2017

      Based on what I've been able to discover about the Mahindra, it is anything BUT a "throwaway truck." Rather, it is a direct descendant of the Willys Jeep, having been licensed in perpetuity back when Jeep was a Kaiser brand, shortly after WWII. In fact, the Mahindra is more Jeep than the American Jeep, because it's kept most of what made the Willys Jeep what it was. I do agree that we'd probably see only a handful of new truck models enter the US... there are still safety and emissions regulations that have to be followed, but GM and Fiat specifically have at least one model they could bring in without pricing them out of their market without that tax... It's not the mid-sized trucks they'd be competing with, it would be the compact market that is currently OWNED by CUVs.

  • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Jul 20, 2017

    “This is more a lifestyle oriented pick-up. It’s not a basic workhorse.” That would be like Marchionne saying the Jeep Wrangler isn't an off-road vehicle or the Demon isn't a dragster or Ferrari's aren't meant to be driven fast. Why don't they just say it is a badge engineered Nissan......... That would be just as effective as a marketing tool.

  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
  • Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
  • MaintenanceCosts You expect everything on Amazon and eBay to be fake, but it's a shame to see fake stuff on Summit Racing. Glad they pulled it.
  • SCE to AUX 08 Rabbit (college car, 128k miles): Everything is expensive and difficult to repair. Bought it several years ago as a favor to a friend leaving the country. I outsourced the clutch ($1200), but I did all other work. Ignition switch, all calipers, pads, rotors, A/C compressor, blower fan, cooling fan, plugs and coils, belts and tensioners, 3 flat tires (nails), and on and on.19 Ioniq EV (66k miles): 12V battery, wipers, 1 set of tires, cabin air filter, new pads and rotors at 15k miles since the factory ones wore funny, 1 qt of reduction gear oil. Insurance is cheap. It costs me nearly nothing to drive it.22 Santa Fe (22k miles): Nothing yet, except oil changes. I dread having to buy tires.
Next