2018 Chevrolet Traverse Priced: $1,280 Increase for the First New Traverse in a Decade

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

The first-generation Chevrolet Traverse was the fourth Lambda platform crossover to arrive, a value-oriented follow-up to the Buick Enclave, GMC Acadia, and Saturn Outlook.

The Outlook died with Saturn following the 2010 model year. The GMC Acadia has migrated to a slightly smaller segment — it’s now available with a four-cylinder engine and two rows of seats.

And after a lengthy first-gen run, the second-generation 2018 Chevrolet Traverse is finally upon us. We learned earlier in July that the Traverse would reach high up into GMC Acadia Denali and Buick Enclave territory. Now the configurator is live, and the $30,875 2018 Traverse L is $1,280 more costly than the most basic 2017 Chevrolet Traverse — only $1,660 more than the basic Traverse was in 2009.

Despite the array of additional equipment, fuel economy that now measures 18 miles per gallon city; 27 highway (instead of 17 mpg city; 24 highway as in 2009), and the anticipated improvements in ride, handling, and NVH, the 2018 Chevrolet Traverse’s $30,875 base price equals $27,000 in 2009 dollars.

The 2018 Traverse features seven trim levels; the two middle-rung LT models essentially being variants of one another. The Traverse L has the $30,875 price of entry. The $32,995 LS adds tinted glass and makes all-wheel drive a $2,000 option. All-wheel drive is unavailable on the base L and the RS but standard (in twin-clutch guise) on the top-spec $52,995 Traverse High Country.

In between are $35,495 LT Cloth (18-inch wheels, heated mirrors, power driver’s seat, leather-wrapped wheel) and $42,095 LT Leather (Surround Vision, blind spot monitoring, 20-inch wheels, power liftgate, remote start, Bose audio, power passenger seat, heated front seats) trims before you reach the previous Traverse’s top edition: the $45,395 Premier. The Premier adds LED headlights, dual exhaust, memory for the driver’s seat, a power tilt and telescoping wheel, perforated leather, and heated second row seats. The $52,995 High Country’s all-wheel-drive system is unique, there are auto high beams, forward collision alert and other active safety features such as lane keep assist and adaptive cruise, a fixed rear skylight, and a power folding third row.

The Traverse’s Premier trim can be made into a Traverse Redline for $2,495. The Traverse RS, not yet priced, will be the only Traverse with a 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder generating 255 horsepower and 295 lb-ft of torque. Highway fuel economy for the Traverse 2.0T is down 2 mpg (to 23) from the 3.6-liter V6, but city fuel economy is up 2 mpg to 20. The 3.6-liter V6 now generates 310 horsepower and 266 lb-ft of torque. It’s linked to a nine-speed automatic at every level. The 2018 Chevrolet Traverse L and Traverse LS seat eight. All other 2018 Traverses are seven seaters.

Through the end of June 2017, General Motors had reported 894,025 U.S. sales of the Chevrolet Traverse. 2015 was its best year, with nearly 120,000 sales. At the end of the line, 2016 volume dropped off only marginally. Year-to-date, a 4-percent year-over-year increase puts the Traverse on track for its best year ever.

[Images: General Motors]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 13 comments
  • JEFFSHADOW JEFFSHADOW on Jul 27, 2017

    When I spied the 2017 Acadia "downsized" SUV I felt sorry for the GMC dealers. Why make a luxury SUV the same size as the Terrain? What was wrong with the original Lambda size? Of course they built the LIMITED, for a "limited" time, when they could have sold those for many more years. My next "Milwaukee Road"-painted SUV may have to be a Traverse. The Enclave is fantastic but too luxurious to be a freight train (somehow my Rainier works just fine for now!). The ideal solution is to buy a 2010 Outlook XR, rebadge it as an Oldsmobile Bravada, and paint that to match the Milwaukee Road SDL-39 #586 from 1975.

    • Spartan Spartan on Jul 28, 2017

      GMC probably didn't want two 7 passenger vehicles. So the Acadia was downsized while maintaining a similar price structure and that opened the door for more Yukon sales, which are a lot more profitable than Acadia sales. Compact CUV: Terrain Midsize CUV: Acadia Full Size SUV: Yukon / Yukon XL I think that makes more sense. The Acadia had gotten too bloaty anyway. It looked weird, especially with the old Saturn body panels they were using. The Acadia is right sized now. No one in an Acadia was using that third row anyway. If you want a third row in a GMC, you buy a Yukon, preferably an XL that actually has a usable third row.

  • Nigel Nigel on Jul 29, 2017

    The Acadia has a third row. It is a bit smaller but ok to use. The storage area behind the third row really shrunk. Looking to replace our Pilot and the Acadia currently is tops on being right sized. I do want to test drive the Atlas first.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next