No Matter How Big Audi SUVs Get, Don't Ever Expect a Diesel

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Audi’s European introduction of the beastly SQ7 SUV caused no shortage of speculation last year. Even as Volkswagen Group’s emissions scandal raged, many hoped the raw power of the SQ7’s cutting-edge diesel engine would be enough to compel Audi to bring the model stateside.

Waiting followed. Then, even more waiting. Audi told excited journos it hadn’t greenlit the model for a U.S. launch, despite its very marketable 435 horsepower and 664 lb-ft of torque — power made possible by 4.0 liters of displacement, two turbochargers and a lightning-quick electric supercharger.

Late last year, Volkswagen CEO Herbert Diess put the chill on expectations, telling everyone it wasn’t likely they’d ever see a new diesel Volkswagen product in the United States. This, despite current advancements in diesel technology. It now seems any hesitation the automaker might have felt about that proclamation has evaporated.

Diesels? Dream on.

Speaking to Car and Driver at a recent Formula E race in Germany, Audi development chief erased any last hopes for oil aficionados. When asked whether the company’s squeaky-clean next-generation diesels might take a U.S. trip, Peter Mertens was blunt about the issue. It’s not just your environmental regulators, it’s you, he said.

“Now you’re putting me in a corner,” Mertens said. “I would say no, and why is that so? I do not believe that Americans in their true belief and heart, their cultural way of driving, are suited to diesel. They aren’t. Everybody tried—we Europeans tried to give an answer maybe to a question that wasn’t asked.”

Americans and diesels just aren’t that compatible, you see. Oil and vinegar. Dharma and Greg. Starsky and Hutch. Mertens explained the problem is not just about technology or culture. While an inability to meet emissions standards led VW down a lawless path a decade ago, VW feels a truly clean diesel is doable — but who trusts it?

“Diesel can be clean with technology, but the problem is the image,” Mertens said. “People think that diesel is bad. It’s not helping us and it’s not helping the environment, speaking frankly. It would be great if we could come back to technical terms and realities instead of alternative facts when it comes to diesel, but it’s very difficult to fight them.”

An engine like the one found in the SQ7 could have proven useful in the U.S., and not just for Audi’s current range-topper. The automaker’s U.S. executives hope to gain approval for an even larger utility vehicle, given it’s the number one request they hear from brand faithful. Americans want a big SUV. However, big SUVs need big power, and though Audi has no shortage of powerful six- and eight-cylinder engines at its disposal, fuel economy remains a concern.

Should U.S. Audi execs get their way, the full-size SUV would likely require some form of electric assistance. If not for the model itself, then one of its variants.

[Image: © 2017 Chris Tonn/The Truth About Cars]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 70 comments
  • LazyJK LazyJK on Jun 18, 2017

    Big, complicated and powerful VW-group diesel engine? Imagine all the potential ways for it to blow up!

  • JRobUSC JRobUSC on Jun 18, 2017

    "Diesel can be clean with technology, but the problem is the image,” Mertens said. “People think that diesel is bad. It’s not helping us and it’s not helping the environment, speaking frankly. It would be great if we could come back to technical terms and realities instead of alternative facts when it comes to diesel, but it’s very difficult to fight them.” Wow, that's pretty infuriating to read, seeing as how the bad image he's referring to WAS CAUSED BY HIS COMPANY. Those European companies he said tried unsuccessfully to help diesels image? HIS CHEATING, LYING OMPANY SCREWED THEM OVER. What an ass.

    • LazyJK LazyJK on Jun 18, 2017

      Like a passive-aggressive 12-year old... kind of scary when you think about it and it proves nothing has changed at the top at VW group.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I'd rather they have the old sweep gauges, the hhuuggee left to right speedometer from the 40's and 50's where the needle went from lefty to right like in my 1969 Nova
  • Buickman I like it!
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
Next