Uber Builds New AI Team North of the Border as It Battles Lawsuit in the U.S.

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Uber must be feeling somewhat confident in its legal battle with Waymo over stolen autonomous tech, because it’s assembling a new artificial intelligence team in Canada.

The group will serve as part of Uber’s Advanced Technologies Group, which has found itself at the core of the lawsuit, and focus on enhancing the company’s autonomous vehicle software.

Based in Ontario, the team will be headed by Raquel Urtasun, a leader in the field of machine learning at the University of Toronto. Uber also plans to invest $5 million in the Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence, a nonprofit associated with the university. Despite being an important hub for the North American automotive industry, Toronto has seen engineers and researches move to the United States for work. Hoping to anchor talent in the North, the city established the MaRS Discovery District. MaRS is designed to attract companies and inspire investments into Canadian startups and seems to have worked its magic on Uber, who will be setting up the AI offices there.

According to Bloomberg, Urtasun will aid Uber in the future development of vision software that allows an autonomous vehicle’s camera system to make sense of the world around it. She’s taking a leave of absence from the university in order to focus on the project, allotting only a single day per week for U of T and the Vector Institute.

“The University of Toronto has long been considered a global leader in artificial intelligence research. That’s why we’re so pleased to see Professor Raquel Urtasun, one of the world’s leading researchers in the field of machine perception, take on this incredibly exciting role,” Meric Gertler, president of the University of Toronto, said in a statement.

[Image: Volvo]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 7 comments
  • Markf Markf on May 09, 2017

    Is is at all possible for you to make a single comment without referencing Trump? Do you have any other thoughts besides Trump? His greatest ever real estate deal is getting to live inside your head rent free.

  • Sutherland555 Sutherland555 on May 09, 2017

    More than happy to see well-paid high tech jobs coming north of the border and boosting our economy. There's a lot of talk about diversifying the Canadian economy away from being heavily dependent on resources so this is nothing but good news to me.

    • See 1 previous
    • Stuki Stuki on May 10, 2017

      @shoshone As opposed to most of what passes for "the economy" these days, techies are actually in the value add business. As in, produce something more valuable than the inputs consumed. They are not in any way, shape or form locust like. The entire idiot superstructure created of lawyers, banksters and other expendable riffraff that are, with the help of their captive junta, feeding off of what value techies are creating, are the ones causing problems. The techies did their thing much better, long before the parasites came dragging with Fed freshprint enabled stupid valuations of anything involving acts as advanced as spelling "coputer." None of them need the so called "capital" the free freshprint army get handed to them by The Fed in ever greater amounts; as all it does it drive up the cost of the inputs needed for innovation. Hence transfer control over innovation away from competent people, and towards merely connected ones. What is "destroying" the "housing market" (racket is infinitely more accurate than market), is the same old money printing. And in addition, the idiotic theft racket called zoning. In a market, prices clear by supply rising to meet demand. If you can find a way to produce a cell phone cheaper than the prevailing price, you produce it. Increasing supply, until prices drop to where you can no longer produce a cell phone cheaper than the prevailing price. You make out by the differential opened up by the efficiency improvement you made, the rest of the world by the lower prices it eventually enables. The way the housing racket works, would be analogous to if those who happened to own a cell phone in 1990, could forever ban anyone else from building one. To ensure the price of their own cell phone were kept artificially high. That'why houses are expensive in the Bay Area. If it was up to techies, rather than reams of lawyers, banksters, self righteous mediocrities of all stripes and corruptocrats, the "problem" of housing would be attacked the same way techies attack all problems: By building better, cheaper, faster, more advanced.... And continuously doing so. Destroying the value of old junk, ensuring it gets replaced by newer, better, as quickly as possible. Since techies are, as stated at the opening, actually competent, productive people. Who hence do not need, nor want, laws, bans, harassments and all the other pathologies brought about, by the totalitarian junta state propped up by the bankster/lawyer/sales hack/bureaucrat/other assorted backmarker scum that has, and continue to, run a once decent country ever more thoroughly into the ground.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next