GM to Pull Out of World's Second Most Populous Country, Sell Off Other Operations in Quest for Cash

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

In its global push for profitability, General Motors plans to yank the Chevrolet brand out of the hands of Indian consumers.

The automaker announced a wave of restructuring in overseas markets yesterday, a large part of which is the cancellation of nearly $1 billion in investment in India and the pull-out of its only brand. Until recently, GM had hoped to cater to the country’s growing middle class with a new line of region-specific Chevy models.

GM also plans to sell its South African division and cut back on staff in Singapore. The move will help the automaker free up money to funnel towards its biggest markets — North America and China.

The automaker’s overseas operations have struggled in recent years. Just two months ago, it reached a deal with France’s PSA Group to unload its money-losing European Vauxhall and Opel brands. The most recent plans will see it save $100 million per year in unprofitable regions.

“What are we spending our time doing?” GM President Dan Ammann told Reuters. “Are we spending time pursuing opportunities … or all of our time fixing problems?”

Ammann said by cutting back in these markets, GM can focus more senior management time and engineering effort towards its looming truck and SUV “onslaught.”

While Indians can say goodbye to GM vehicles — which faced increasing competition from the likes of Suzuki — the automaker will continue to build vehicles for export to Mexico, Central and South America at its Talegaon assembly plant. The GM design and engineering center in Bangalore will continue operations.

In South Africa, the automaker plans to stop producing Chevrolet vehicles after doing so in the country for 91 years and sell its assembly plant to Isuzu Motors. The Japanese automaker will also buy GM’s 30-percent stake in a joint truck-building operation for an undisclosed sun.

“We determined that continued or increased investment in manufacturing in South Africa would not provide GM the expected returns of other global investment opportunities,” said GM International President Stefan Jacoby in a statement.

Earlier this year, GM announced a pull-out in east Africa, with Isuzu purchasing its 57.7 percent stake in that venture. GM sales in both India and South Africa will cease by the end of the year.

[Image: GM]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 65 comments
  • Geozinger Geozinger on May 18, 2017

    The usual suspects on an anti-GM tirade. We have no inside info on why GM thinks it should shutter it's Indian division. I have no ideas either. However, during the Great Financial Crisis, folks told GM to "be more like Toyota". And after the loan guarantees (bailouts for the remaining tea baggers, I mean tea partyers), folks told GM to make enough money to never need a loan guarantee again. So, they're doing these things. Being more like Toyota and making enough money to not need loan guarantees again. They're shedding liabilities, employees and under-performing subsidiaries; not unlike GE or other big companies, i.e., Ford. But let's not information we don't have and a drive to make money get in the way of a good rant against GM. Because all of these armchair quarterbacks know the global production situation... Even Tata has a hard time selling the Nano in India. Chew on that for a while.

    • See 2 previous
    • Geozinger Geozinger on May 20, 2017

      @Higheriq: The issue with the Tata Nano, is that it was specifically designed for the Indian market. Which is why I find their lack of success all the more ironic. While the Suzuki Maruti models currently rule, it wasn't all that long ago they were still competing against the likes of the Hindustan Ambassador. I've never been to India and admit to not knowing a great deal about the country. Even with all of the automakers efforts to "crack" the Indian market, it appears to me that (what I would call the) scooter is still king of transportation for an economy on the rise. From what I gather, it will still be a while before the average Indian will have the capability to assimilate an automobile into their lives. With regard to GM's recent move there, we have a saying here that doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results is the definition of insanity. I believe that Ms Barra has taken the threat that GM will never receive overt US government assistance. To that end, it seems they are rationalizing business and maximizing profits where possible.

  • AdamOfAus AdamOfAus on May 19, 2017

    Which sun was Isuzu going to trade for those SA operations? Not our one I hope.

  • 28-Cars-Later I'm getting a Knight Rider vibe... or is it more Knightboat?
  • 28-Cars-Later "the person would likely be involved in taking the Corvette to the next level with full electrification."Chevrolet sold 37,224 C8s in 2023 starting at $65,895 in North America (no word on other regions) while Porsche sold 40,629 Taycans worldwide starting at $99,400. I imagine per unit Porsche/VAG profit at $100K+ but was far as R&D payback and other sunk costs I cannot say. I remember reading the new C8 platform was designed for hybrids (or something to that effect) so I expect Chevrolet to experiment with different model types but I don't expect Corvette to become the Taycan. If that is the expectation, I think it will ride off into the sunset because GM is that incompetent/impotent. Additional: In ten years outside of wrecks I expect a majority of C8s to still be running and economically roadworthy, I do not expect that of Taycans.
  • Tassos Jong-iL Not all martyrs see divinity, but at least you tried.
  • ChristianWimmer My girlfriend has a BMW i3S. She has no garage. Her car parks on the street in front of her apartment throughout the year. The closest charging station in her neighborhood is about 1 kilometer away. She has no EV-charging at work.When her charge is low and she’s on the way home, she will visit that closest 1 km away charger (which can charge two cars) , park her car there (if it’s not occupied) and then she has two hours time to charge her car before she is by law required to move. After hooking up her car to the charger, she has to walk that 1 km home and go back in 2 hours. It’s not practical for sure and she does find it annoying.Her daily trip to work is about 8 km. The 225 km range of her BMW i3S will last her for a week or two and that’s fine for her. I would never be able to handle this “stress”. I prefer pulling up to a gas station, spend barely 2 minutes filling up my small 53 liter fuel tank, pay for the gas and then manage almost 720 km range in my 25-35% thermal efficient internal combustion engine vehicle.
  • Tassos Jong-iL Here in North Korea we are lucky to have any tires.
Next