Nissan Prepares to Rejoin the Competition With Next Wave of Electric Vehicles

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Consumer demand may be the driving force behind automakers shifting assembly line production toward crossover vehicles, but there is another trend that has nothing to do with modern-day sales. Electric vehicles have a small but loyal consumer base and the majority of carmakers seem poised to ensure the next decade caters directly to them — whether it be through pure BEVs or hybridized powertrains.

However, not every manufacturer has its electrified ducks in a row. Despite hitting its mark with the Leaf EV, Nissan has been resting on its laurels since 2010 and hasn’t made the same sort of technological promises that Volkswagen Group or Ford cannot help but keep repeating… over and over again. Nissan’s chief planning officer Philippe Klein even admitted in January that his company’s EV prospects are dim and something needs to be done.

“Five or six years ago, we were looked at as a kind of adventurous company, moving into an area where nobody was expecting us to move,” Klein told Automotive News. “And now you have a lot of players making big announcements, and we are looked at like laggards.”

Fortunately, Nissan’s new CEO Hiroto Saikawa says the business has started taking steps to ensure it is not left behind in the next decade — starting with the alleviation of range anxiety. Saikawa says automakers, including Nissan, should have something to calm Leaf owners’ nerves before 2020. However, he admitted that may only apply to customers in Japan and Europe, who usually put fewer miles on the odometer.

When we asked Nissan to confirm whether or not the next-generation Leaf would make it to North America, it responded with, “As a matter of policy, we do not discuss future product plans.”

However, we have it on good authority that the Leaf will continue to persist in Canada and the United States. It just might not possess the range required to appease our vehicular sensibilities. But Saikawa says something electric is coming with a range above 300 miles within the next couple of years — and it should be joined by an array of hybrid and all-electric models between 2020 and 2025.

“The real evolution will come when we have a serious plan for the substitution of existing powertrains, say in our major models: the Rogue, Qashqai, X-Trail. A major part of it will be EV. This is the time I’m talking about. Maybe 2025,” Saikawa explained.

“But the period of differentiating ourselves by technology is almost over. Then, [it] will be a competition of how aggressively you can deploy the portfolio across the models. We would like to be on the aggressive side, the leading side.”

[Image: Nissan]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
12 of 37 comments
  • Stingray65 Stingray65 on Apr 11, 2017

    Would anyone get excited if Nissan announced a new gasoline 50 mpg commuter car with a 4 gallon tank, a refueling nozzle the diameter of a drinking straw, and a weak heater and A/C unit that cut range by 1/3 if they are actually used in hot or cold weather?

    • See 6 previous
    • Ugliest1 Ugliest1 on Apr 12, 2017

      @stingray65 Anecdotal stories are good... but like the cat who sat down on a hot stove and will never sit down on a hot or cold stove again, one should only take the appropriate amount of learning from a story. @stingray you mention the use of A/C in Arizona... my story is in 2014 we were stopped ½ way between Flagstaff and Kingman in 110d heat for two hours while an accident up ahead was dealt with. We were totally comfortable in the car with the A/C going for more than 1.5 hours. Once I got out to take a look ahead, and the heat hit me like a fist. The cost of the A/C? 6 miles of range. So I dispute your generalization that A/C kills an EV battery. And that brings the rest of your story into question -- I'm thinking there's less learning necessary from cold Norwegian skiers than you would prefer.

  • FormerFF FormerFF on Apr 11, 2017

    I do believe that given the current state of battery technology and driving conditions in the U. S., that the PHEV is a better choice than an BEV for most drivers. Having driven one for the last three years has made me a believer. Once you do your in-town driving in an EV, it's tough to go back.

    • See 2 previous
    • Shaker Shaker on Apr 12, 2017

      @highdesertcat "But then the power companies have to get involved and they don’t like being sold back electricity at the same KW-rate they charge consumers. Funny how that works. The consumer always gets screwed in the end." Which is why the government would have to get involved to keep the utility companies AND the consumer from losing out in the transition to much cleaner energy. The consumer wants clean, uninterrupted power, but still needs grid power 15% of the time in summer, up to 80% of the time in winter - the utility can certainly use the solar boost on high-demand summer afternoons, but can't sustain a grid buying back power at market rates. So, do we call God Almighty to arbitrate this situation, or try something sensible? Like an entity trusted (more or less) by both parties without a "dog in the fight" to do what's best to advance our society, spur innovation, and lessen the reliance on fossil fuels, which (even taking out the CO2 argument), damages the environment that we all have to live in... a not-for-profit entity that has authority to enforce the agreements made?

  • Brian Uchida Laguna Seca, corkscrew, (drying track off in rental car prior to Superbike test session), at speed - turn 9 big Willow Springs racing a motorcycle,- at greater speed (but riding shotgun) - The Carrousel at Sears Point in a 1981 PA9 Osella 2 litre FIA racer with Eddie Lawson at the wheel! (apologies for not being brief!)
  • Mister It wasn't helped any by the horrible fuel economy for what it was... something like 22mpg city, iirc.
  • Lorenzo I shop for all-season tires that have good wet and dry pavement grip and use them year-round. Nothing works on black ice, and I stopped driving in snow long ago - I'll wait until the streets and highways are plowed, when all-seasons are good enough. After all, I don't live in Canada or deep in the snow zone.
  • FormerFF I’m in Atlanta. The summers go on in April and come off in October. I have a Cayman that stays on summer tires year round and gets driven on winter days when the temperature gets above 45 F and it’s dry, which is usually at least once a week.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X I've never driven anything that would justify having summer tires.
Next