Upcoming Buick Regal GS Says Goodbye to the Stick, Document Shows

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Buick did a bad job hiding the fact that a brawny GS variant of its 2018 Regal Sportback is on the way. It accidentally teased the vehicle’s presence on its Canadian website earlier this month before attempting — and failing — to remove all traces of this nugget from the internet.

Well, thanks to the California Air Resources Board, we now have documented proof of the GS’s return. The go-fast Buick will bow as a 2018 model, perhaps concurrently with its liftback and wagon siblings, but don’t expect any drivetrain similarities to the outgoing model.

The emissions document covers a host of 2018 General Motors passenger cars outfitted with 3.6-liter V6 engines. As the lesser Regals see only a turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder (in two torque outputs), the 3.6-liter “Regal AWD” listed here can only be the GS.

This GS breaks with the current model in several ways. This time around, it looks like GM isn’t in the mood to offer buyers much choice. The only transmission available is a nine-speed automatic, which means the save-the-manuals crowd can add Buick to its list of automakers no longer fielding a stick shift.

Oddly, the nine-speed gearbox is only found on front-wheel drive variants of the 2018 Regal Sportback and TourX. As the document states, four-wheel motivation comes standard on the GS, unlike the choice offered by the previous generation. Buick’s AWD system features torque vectoring for improved performance.

While the document doesn’t dish any details on engine output, the same engine makes between 305 and 335 horsepower in other applications. For the GS, it’s possible GM could raise that power ceiling.

One thing that isn’t too mysterious is what the GS should look like. The China-bound GS was revealed last week ahead of the Shanghai Auto Show, sporting a body kit, chromed air inlets and larger, blacked-out wheels. Unlike stateside customers, Chinese buyers will have to make do with GM’s turbo 2.0-liter as the sole engine offering.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 15 comments
  • Superdessucke Superdessucke on Apr 17, 2017

    Yawn. A resurrected Somerset package outsells this unoffending "sport" model 5:1. Next.

  • Nickoo Nickoo on Apr 17, 2017

    Who really cares? This car is apparently a loser in quality and dependability and has the highest initial sell/off return rate of all vehicles on the road, if you happen to even see one, they are rarer than hen's teeth, I've seen one regal (not even the GS, in the last 5 years)...And it's no wonder, its the same cost as the German brands that come with more cache, with NONE of that cache associated with it. In addition, it has the "I can't believe that's a Busquawk!" cringe worthy marketing with terrible music. Anyone who WANTS to drive a stick probably wouldn't be choosing a Buick Regal GS to begin with, so many better choices out there with the big 3 from Japan and the big 3 from Germany. That puts this car at 7th place, if not even worse, yes I realize not all of those have a stick option, but still, 7th place...Not to mention, stick drivers, who have to drive a stick are probably looking at something to pair that stick with besides a midsized "performance" sedan, mustang, challenger, miata, 370Z, etc. BTW, I'm not sure if I should be amused or offended when WordPress asks me to "prove my humanity" when I log in, and prove it with solving 2+1...

    • See 1 previous
    • Superdessucke Superdessucke on Apr 18, 2017

      Unless you got one wrong I wouldn't worry too much.

  • Jalop1991 is this anything like a cheap high end German car?
  • HotRod Not me personally, but yes - lower prices will dramatically increase the EV's appeal.
  • Slavuta "the price isn’t terrible by current EV standards, starting at $47,200"Not terrible for a new Toyota model. But for a Vietnamese no-name, this is terrible.
  • Slavuta This is catch22 for me. I would take RAV4 for the powertrain alone. And I wouldn't take it for the same thing. Engines have history of issues and transmission shifts like glass. So, the advantage over hard-working 1.5 is lost.My answer is simple - CX5. This is Japan built, excellent car which has only one shortage - the trunk space.
  • Slavuta "Toyota engineers have told us that they intentionally build their powertrains with longevity in mind"Engine is exactly the area where Toyota 4cyl engines had big issues even recently. There was no longevity of any kind. They didn't break, they just consumed so much oil that it was like fueling gasoline and feeding oil every time
Next