There's a Little Bit of Patriot in the 2018 Jeep Wrangler, Sort Of

by Steph Willems

Published: March 31st, 2017

there s a little bit of patriot in the 2018 jeep wrangler sort of

As Jeep super fans nervously await the official reveal of the next-generation Wrangler, images posted online suggest that deeply held fears of an unforgivably altered 2018 model might come to nothing.

Two images appeared on JL Wrangler Forums this week, claiming to show a 2018 Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon. While the site’s administration says the images are confirmed to be authentic, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles hasn’t made a statement backing that up. So, we’re left looking at what could very well be the next Wrangler.

Several changes immediately catch the eye.

You wouldn’t expect to see much visual evidence of the Wrangler’s adoption of weight-saving aluminum — mainly in the doors, hood and rear gate — but a new design feature could be related.

The Jeep in these images sports a well-defined beltline aft of the windshield, not unlike an aluminum-doored Land Rover Defender. Jeep only makes changes to the Wrangler when necessary, so we’ll assume the slightly sculpted sides have something to do with panel stiffness. It’s hard not to be reminded of the recently departed Patriot.

Up front, the changes are subtle, yet noticeable. The Wrangler keeps its signature, round headlights and seven-slot grille, though the grille now bends slightly rearward about halfway up. The bumper, while still of the exposed variety, now extends further from the body, and is more shapely to boot. In another act of aerodynamic improvement, the Wrangler’s windshield is more steeply raked.

Just aft of the front fenders, a recessed vent appears, likely to improve airflow around the front wheel wells.

These images are a tempting teaser for a vehicle scheduled to go into production late this year. Besides a pickup variant (which FCA has now pushed back to late 2019), the next-gen Wrangler should be offered — eventually — with a hybrid powertrain. Expect the Pentastar 3.6-liter V6 engine to return, with an optional turbocharged 2.0-liter inline-four.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

#2018JeepWrangler #Design #Fca #FiatChryslerAutomobiles #FutureModels #Jeep #JeepWrangler

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

6 of 12 comments

Tylanner on Mar 31, 2017

I bin this design as a display of "incredible restraint". It is difficult to compare the incredible success of the Wrangler silhouette with any other automobile.

Like Reply
- JohnTaurus on Apr 01, 2017
  
  Perhaps the Ford Mustang. Long hood with a short deck has pretty much been its profile throughout its life. Hard not to recognize one as anything but a Mustang (or a thinly disguised one as a Mercury for a few years).
  
  Like
Cgjeep on Mar 31, 2017

I wish they would make a metal non removable hardtop body like a Defender. At least as an option. Might just be the little extra refinement I need

Like Reply
- See 2 previous
- Vulpine on Mar 31, 2017
  
  Such a metal hardtop is uncharacteristic of Jeep, with the exception of purpose-built models like those once used by the US post office. Too many Jeep owners at least want the ability to remove the top, at least to some extent, for that open-air sense of freedom while crawling the trails. That said, there is some rumor that the new top will have different removable panels and that the soft-top version will have a very Euro-like sliding canvas roof compared to the complex mechanicals of the existing style of folding roof. So what you may get is a compromise between the current fiberglass roof and the fixed metal roof you so desire. After buying a Renegade, I happen to like the idea of easy-to-remove panels vs the heavy fiberglass roof on the older model Wrangler.
  
  Like
- Caltemus on Apr 03, 2017
  
  I'd love to see one with the steel roof you mention, but they definitely would need to remove the roll bars if they had a non-removable welded/unibody steel top. The roll bars take up so much space in the passenger compartment
  
  Like
- Vulpine on Apr 03, 2017
  
  @caltemus The roll bars themselves take up very little passenger space; it's all the airbags and padding that make them seem so much thicker than they are. Even so, they don't take up enough space to complain about unless you're carrying a load of plus-sized passengers or packing it "to the gills" for a camping trip and even there they can be more useful with just a little forethought and imagination. I've owned one of the Daimler-designed models and those roll bars are hardly an issue.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Fred I would get the Acura RDX, to replace my Honda HR-V. Both it and the CRV seats are uncomfortable on longer trips.
RHD Now that the negative Nellies have chimed in...A reasonably priced electric car would be a huge hit. There has to be an easy way to plug it in at home, in addition to the obvious relatively trickle charge via an extension cord. Price it under 30K, preferably under 25K, with a 200 mile range and you have a hit on your hands. This would be perfect for a teenager going to high school or a medium-range commuter. Imagine something like a Kia Soul, Ford Ranger, Honda CR-V, Chevy Malibu or even a Civic that costs a small fraction to fuel up compared to gasoline. Imagine not having to pay your wife's Chevron card bill every month (then try to get her off of Starbuck's and mani-pedi habits). One car is not the solution to every case imaginable. But would it be a market success? Abso-friggin-lutely. And TTAC missed today's announcement of the new Mini Aceman, which, unfortunately, will be sold only in China. It's an EV, so it's relevant to this particular article/question.
Ajla It would. Although if future EVs prove relatively indifferent to prior owner habits that makes me more likely to go used.
28-Cars-Later One of the biggest reasons not to purchase an EV that I hear is...that they just all around suck for almost every use case imaginable.
Theflyersfan A cheaper EV is likely to have a smaller battery (think Mazda MX-30 and Mitsubishi iMEV), so that makes it less useful for some buyers. Personally, my charging can only take place at work or at a four-charger station at the end of my street in a public lot, so that's a crapshoot. If a cheaper EV was able to capture what it seems like a lot of buyers want - sub-40K, 300+ mile range, up to 80% charging in 20-30 minutes (tops) - then they can possibly be added to some lists. But then the issues of depreciation and resale value come into play if someone wants to keep the car for a while. But since this question is asking person by person, if I had room for a second car to be garaged (off of the street), I would consider an EV for a second car and keep my current one as a weekend toy. But I can't do a 50K+ EV as a primary car with my uncertain charging infrastructure by me, road trips, and as a second car, the higher insurance rates and county taxes. Not yet at least. A plug in hybrid however is perfect.