Lamborghini Takes a Pass on Electrification for Reasons Other Than Claimed

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Lamborghini has said it is more or less open to the idea of an all-electric car, though it definitely hasn’t considered it seriously. While parent company Volkswagen AG has made lofty promises of sweeping electrification and imposed its zero-emission mindset onto the majority of its automotive brands, the Italian supercar manufacturer is not yet among them.

However, Lamborghini has shown that it’s not immune to industry trends. Its almost-family-friendly Urus SUV begins production next month and the automaker has said it plans to launch a hybridized version by 2020. While you can’t ignore the LM002 that preceded it, that’s still a far cry from the pavement-scraping exotics it’s best known for. There has also been plenty of speculation that the company was developing a Porsche Mission E-based electric model called Vitola. Lamborghini dispelled those rumors and has since gone on to say that a battery-only car won’t be on the table before 2025 — and perhaps not even then.

“Electrification is an area of great attention for us, but I’m not expecting it will happen in the short term,” Lambo CEO Stefano Domenicali told Reuters at the Geneva International Motor Show.

Domenicali claims the reason revolves around a need to preserve the basic nature of a supercar — specifically referencing weight and performance. He also said that the automaker has to consider the cost of developing an EV that would meet Lamborghini’s standards for a supercar. It’s easy to poke holes in this argument, as the Urus shares a platform with the Bentley Bentayga and Audi Q7. Neither of those are svelte vehicles and, while nobody expects the Lambo to match the Bentley’s 5,340 pound heft, the Urus will undoubtedly tip the scales at over two tons.

Sharing internals with other companies lowers development costs, and Lamborghini would almost certainly adopt its electric motor from another VW brand. However, some financial investment would still be required, and that’s the crux of this issue. While I want to believe that the company cares about what a fire-breathing bull-badged supercar should represent, the real reason the Italians are taking a pass on electric cars has everything to do with sales. An EV simply wouldn’t do well enough to rationalize placing it on the market, at least not as a high-performance, low-slung automobile.

Lamborghini has enjoyed good sales figures since the recession, but expanding on them doesn’t appear to be in the cards over the next few years. “For the medium term, I don’t see a change in that substantially positive trend, especially since economic regions like the U.S. and China are showing unchanged growth.” Domenicali explained.

He says production of supercar models will be capped at around 3,500, with a little wiggle room left over — enough for a few hundred extra cars, but no more. The reason is simply to maintain the brand’s exclusivity. Of course, those rules do not apply to the upcoming SUV. If the Urus achieves the kind of success seen by Porsche’s Macan or Cayenne, it could easily double the company’s vehicle output.

“We will be prudent. Of course we will grow sustainably, but being in the luxury market we must not take every growth potential that is there,” said the CEO.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 10 comments
  • Anomaly149 Anomaly149 on Mar 10, 2017

    Smells like there's some brand positioning going on too - with Audi angling for the electro-tech side and Lambo for the gas performance side for now.

  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Mar 10, 2017

    "A man's got to know his limitations." - Harry Callahan

  • Kcflyer So..... Nicer interior than Tesla put's in any vehicle. Interesting.
  • Theflyersfan Couldn't help to notice that a 2025 Kicks new engine makes the same power and gets roughly the same fuel economy of the 1991 Sentra SE-R. Progress?
  • Bouzouki It is easy to pick on GM in general, and the Cobalt in particular, due to the infamous ignition key cylinder issue/recall. And yet, back in the day, even Consumer Reports commented how it was "fun to drive" and every Cobalt should drive like that--though CR noted was expensive (around $20k base, $22-24k MSRP typical sticker). Car and Driver road tested one, with a mildly positive review, but not a rave. I need a car in late 2006, when my boss informed me I was losing my company car, as I would not be travelling for work. I wanted an inexpensive car with a manual trans. I drove a plebeian used Cobalt. I actually liked it. I came back, and was told I should not have driven that car, it was sold. But I liked the car, and started looking for a used one. So I went to another Chevy dealer. He had no manual trans Cobalts, new or used. No wait--he had this yellow supercharged SS. I could drive that. He unburied it (it had been sitting). It had the optional Recaro seat package. The car was a blast! If GM made a front-drive Camaro with a V8, this is what it might be like. I didn't like the color so I left. Then I found Car and Driver's first "Lightning Lap" test, circa 2006. In short, the Cobalt SS Supercharged that some here mock was FIVE seconds quicker than an 06 VW GTI. FIVE SECONDS! Even more impressive, it was a fraction quicker than a ... Mustang GT 5.0. A car with an extra 100 horses. So I looked and found a red one I generally like (options-wise. It needed the Recaro seats--best car seat EVER!). I had no problems with it over 4 years, 50k other than sliding into a curb on a snowy morning about a month after I bought it, causing about $2k of damage to suspension bits (the rim was gouged, but remained round! The tire was reused. The control arm and bearing and 1-2 other items needed replace, but car drove like new). I ordered some snow wheel/tires and put them on afterward. It was a good car in general, and a great-DRIVING car. The steering, shifter, exhaust note, power, engine smoothness. It was hard to believe this was a GM vehicle.... The back seat was big--but the ingress/egress was awful. I had too many cars at the time So I sold it after four years, one of the few cars I regret selling.
  • JLGOLDEN Jeep, Dodge, and Chrysler don't have a suitable competitor for a high-volume segment such as compact crossovers. Abandoning Journey and Cherokee's $25K-$40K bandwidth, left the market to be eaten by Equinox/Terrain, Escape/Bronco Sport, Rogue, RAV 4, and on and on. Further, GM has reinvented entry-level with the striking new Trax and Envista. Nissan is swinging hard for new buyers with a re-invented Kicks. Instead of reading the room, Stellantis focuses on too many models with ambitious pricing at $50K and beyond.
  • ToolGuy This might be a good candidate for an EV conversion.
Next