Alfa Romeo Simply Does Not Know What To Do Next

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

What will Alfa Romeo’s next vehicle be? According to Autocar, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, Alfa Romeo, and Alfa boss Reid Bigland have not yet made a decision about what the segment in which the next Alfa Romeo will compete.

The Mito and Giulietta will remain in Alfa Romeo’s lineup indefinitely despite their limited appeal. Timing for their replacements, which Alfa says must have global appeal, is unknown.

Alfa Romeo’s next vehicle, therefore, will likely be an SUV, Bigland told Autocar.

But bigger than the Stelvio? Or smaller?

TBD.

Alfa’s Reid Bigland, also the chief at Maserati, does not appear to think as highly of older members of Alfa Romeo’s product line as Bigland’s new Alfas. Bigland tells Autocar the Alfa Romeo Mito and Giulietta are “very good cars, but not at the same level as the Giulia and Stelvio,” Alfa’s latest sedan and upcoming SUV.

That’s fair. Older, entry-level models aren’t likely to be as good as the newer models, though the frequency with which new Giulias have failed in the hands of American car journalists makes one wonder how the Mito and Giulietta would perform.

As the Mito and Giulietta stroll along in current guise for the foreseeable future, the Alfa Romeo Stelvio will arrive nearly 15 years after Alfa Romeo showed its Kamal SUV concept in Geneva in 2003.

In other words, product planning at Alfa Romeo has been known to take some time.

And product planning at Alfa Romeo isn’t just time-consuming. Plans are also wont to undergo serious changes.

Changes? You might even call them … what’s the word I’m looking for?

Delays.

Though internal forecasts had suggested Alfa Romeo would produce 400,000 global sales in 2018 — roughly six times its 2016 volume — those forecasts went up in smoke as Alfa Romeo failed to execute on its plan to develop new models.

Just last fall, Alfa Romeo had determined to launch six additional new models by 2020. Joining the Giulia and Stelvio would be a bigger sedan, two more SUVs, a compact Giulietta hatchback replacement, and likely two sports cars.

But 2020 is coming on, and plans for those six new Alfas have “slipped a little bit,” Bigland told Autocar.

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 34 comments
  • 1audiofile 1audiofile on Apr 04, 2017

    I have had 6 Alfas since 1983 and if I had one suggestion to improve the Alfa repution I would work on improving reliability. If Toyota can do it, Alfa can change the design so it is simpler and more reliable. That will impress Europe and the US.

  • Bennetts77833 Bennetts77833 on Apr 04, 2017

    Well just read all the comments on Alfa/FIAT doesn't know what to do next. I suggest looking to the future! Alfa's great handling with an electric drivetrain. Looks like most of you long for ancient technology, a manual gear box come on. If you have to have multiple gears, electronics will do it faster. Speaking as a Chevy Volt driver for the last 35000+ miles (& the last two AROC National Conventions) all electric driving is quirk pleasureable, quiet & environmentally good. I'll be buying my next Alfa when one is available with an electronic drivetrain!

  • Fred I would get the Acura RDX, to replace my Honda HR-V. Both it and the CRV seats are uncomfortable on longer trips.
  • RHD Now that the negative Nellies have chimed in...A reasonably priced electric car would be a huge hit. There has to be an easy way to plug it in at home, in addition to the obvious relatively trickle charge via an extension cord. Price it under 30K, preferably under 25K, with a 200 mile range and you have a hit on your hands. This would be perfect for a teenager going to high school or a medium-range commuter. Imagine something like a Kia Soul, Ford Ranger, Honda CR-V, Chevy Malibu or even a Civic that costs a small fraction to fuel up compared to gasoline. Imagine not having to pay your wife's Chevron card bill every month (then try to get her off of Starbuck's and mani-pedi habits). One car is not the solution to every case imaginable. But would it be a market success? Abso-friggin-lutely. And TTAC missed today's announcement of the new Mini Aceman, which, unfortunately, will be sold only in China. It's an EV, so it's relevant to this particular article/question.
  • Ajla It would. Although if future EVs prove relatively indifferent to prior owner habits that makes me more likely to go used.
  • 28-Cars-Later One of the biggest reasons not to purchase an EV that I hear is...that they just all around suck for almost every use case imaginable.
  • Theflyersfan A cheaper EV is likely to have a smaller battery (think Mazda MX-30 and Mitsubishi iMEV), so that makes it less useful for some buyers. Personally, my charging can only take place at work or at a four-charger station at the end of my street in a public lot, so that's a crapshoot. If a cheaper EV was able to capture what it seems like a lot of buyers want - sub-40K, 300+ mile range, up to 80% charging in 20-30 minutes (tops) - then they can possibly be added to some lists. But then the issues of depreciation and resale value come into play if someone wants to keep the car for a while. But since this question is asking person by person, if I had room for a second car to be garaged (off of the street), I would consider an EV for a second car and keep my current one as a weekend toy. But I can't do a 50K+ EV as a primary car with my uncertain charging infrastructure by me, road trips, and as a second car, the higher insurance rates and county taxes. Not yet at least. A plug in hybrid however is perfect.
Next