Possible French Takeover of Opel Ruffles German Feathers

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Maybe it’s leftover regional rivalry from generations past, or perhaps Germany just doesn’t want anything to affect its status as Europe’s financial powerhouse. Whatever the deep-seated reason, the residents of Deutschland are none too pleased about a possible French takeover of the Opel brand.

Earlier today, PSA Group, maker of Citroën and Peugeot vehicles, was revealed to be in serious talks to acquire the General Motors-owned automaker (as well as its Vauxhall sister company). Politicians and the head of Opel’s workers union apparently didn’t see this coming.

On the other side of the Maginot Line, the French seem just fine with the idea.

Opel operates three factories on German soil, and regardless of who owns Opel in the future, the country wants those plants to stay put.

German Economy Minister Brigitte Zypries was particularly steamed, calling it “unacceptable” that GM discussed selling its European subsidiary without contacting the German government and local players.

“The company carries responsibility for the sites, the development center and the securing of employment,” she said today. “This is my clear expectation regarding General Motors.”

Opel’s works council and the powerful IG Metall labor union blasted GM over the talks. The two groups issued a joint statement, claiming that discussions with PSA held without their permission amounted to “an unprecedented violation of all German and European co-determination rights.”

A local government representative questioned whether there was a political reason behind GM’s desire to drop the unprofitable automaker. Volker Bouffier, prime minister of Hesse, the state in which Opel has its headquarters, mulled “it could also be that General Motors, with respect to the vision of the new American president, has decided to concentrate more on America and less on Europe.”

France, on the other hand, is eyeing the news closely but not getting bent out of shape about anything. As a 14-percent stakeholder in PSA Group, which it bailed out just a handful of years ago, France would like to see its automotive industry reach “critical mass,” an economy ministry source told Reuters.

The same source said France would “give special attention to the impact in terms of jobs and the industrial impact of these initiatives.”

Under the direction of CEO Mary Barra, GM has been on a profitability kick. Unfortunately, Opel and Vauxhall have resisted emerging from red ink, and the lower British pound — and just perhaps, the possibility of boosted tariffs — provide a further incentive to dump the two companies.

[Source: Automotive News, Reuters] [Image: Image: Gnotype/Flickr ( CC BY-SA 3.0)]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 47 comments
  • DC Bruce DC Bruce on Feb 15, 2017

    Love the photo of "Le Grand Charles" in a Citroen DS! I think the rationale is that there's too much auto production capacity in Europe, and GM doesn't want to attempt to beat other European players on status, prestige or whatever. Lord knows, Europe is not the low-cost producer of cars, so that option is tightly foreclosed. And Germany, with its expensive "green energy" is the worst of the bunch. So, this is about German workers' jobs. Of course these plants will be closed, by any company who buys them. Germany's mercantilist economy survives only by virtue of the EU, which prevents currency adjustments by other EU members in response to huge trade imbalances. Of course, we all know that Greeks, Italians, Spaniards, Portuguese and Irish are lazy, right? That's the real problem. ;-)

  • Jeff S Jeff S on Feb 15, 2017

    @Robert Ryan--I don't think the French will ever be known for high quality vehicles. Yes to French wine, cheese, and clothing designs. Also French unions will not make these vehicles competitive unless they produce them in a low cost labor market. Neither does German labor. I would say this merger will eventually lead to the end of Opel but maybe that is not entirely a bad thing.

  • SCE to AUX Range only matters if you need more of it - just like towing capacity in trucks.I have a short-range EV and still manage to put 1000 miles/month on it, because the car is perfectly suited to my use case.There is no such thing as one-size-fits all with vehicles.
  • Doug brockman There will be many many people living in apartments without dedicated charging facilities in future who will need personal vehicles to get to work and school and for whom mass transit will be an annoying inconvenience
  • Jeff Self driving cars are not ready for prime time.
  • Lichtronamo Watch as the non-us based automakers shift more production to Mexico in the future.
  • 28-Cars-Later " Electrek recently dug around in Tesla’s online parts catalog and found that the windshield costs a whopping $1,900 to replace.To be fair, that’s around what a Mercedes S-Class or Rivian windshield costs, but the Tesla’s glass is unique because of its shape. It’s also worth noting that most insurance plans have glass replacement options that can make the repair a low- or zero-cost issue. "Now I understand why my insurance is so high despite no claims for years and about 7,500 annual miles between three cars.
Next