The Early 1980s Are Back! GM Anticipates Big Demand for Diesels
Volkswagen’s emissions scandal may have killed that company’s diesel presence in North America, but it didn’t kill demand for diesel engines in general — especially ones that don’t pollute like Chernobyl and end up in the trash heap.
At least, that’s General Motors’ take on it. The automaker hopes to fill the void created by VW’s oil-burning absence and, in doing so, score some points with the EPA. With diesel engines now available in five vehicles you won’t see on a worksite (and five more that you would), GM has high hopes it can erase memories of its 1980s diesel woes.
This year, the automaker will offer its Europe-sourced and EPA-approved 1.6-liter turbodiesel in the 2017 Chevrolet Cruze and 2018 Equinox, as well as the similarly updated 2018 GMC Terrain. Already, a 2.8-liter four-pot diesel can be had in the Chevy Colorado/GMC Canyon twins.
The move isn’t just about offering customers more torque than the models’ base gas engine can muster. How would any automaker turn down an opportunity to advertise a non-hybrid sedan that gets 52 miles per gallon on the highway? The engine’s availability also boosts GM’s corporate average fuel economy, putting it in the EPA’s good books.
Speaking to The Detroit News, Dan Nicholson, GM’s vice president of global propulsion systems said the “outlook for diesel in the U.S.A. is actually promising.”
“We definitely see certain segments reaching 10 percent penetration and yes, an upside potential of 10 percent overall,” said, adding that 9 percent of Colorado and Canyon buyers opt for the diesel model.
“If we hit that number on Cruze, we’d be delighted. We’d be happy with a lower number than that. We need to test the market and see where things are going.”
Unlike the short-lived first-generation Cruze diesel, which was offered only in high-end trim with an automatic transmission, GM saw fit to move its successor downmarket and offer a manual. That stick shift’s tall upper ratios allows the Cruze TD to reach its lofty MPG figure. The automatic variant, even though a nine-speed, achieves only 47 mpg on the highway.
GM is crossing its fingers and hoping that its high-tech diesels erase some of the stigma oil-burning mills once attached to the automaker. Its V6 and V8 diesels, offered from 1978 to 1985, offered impressive fuel economy for the day, but proved disastrous in practice. Sluggish performance and breakdowns ultimately killed GM’s diesel passenger car gambit, leaving the field wide open for German rivals.
[Image: General Motors]
More by Steph Willems
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Cprescott Think about the bright side of owning a golf cart - free barbeque with each purchase!
- AZFelix Better efficiency for battery fires. Another benefit to tout when promoting EVs.
- EBFlex This must be a mistake. In told all the time, by people here, that EV fires really never happen. Why would LG waste money on this?
- Ajla I don't know if it is my driving style or the tuning or cognitive bias but these turbo-4s never feel as strong as their published output.
- Tylanner Same engine across a $30,000 trim range is INSANE. It just shows how exploitative and arbitrary the pricing scheme is…
Comments
Join the conversation
I wonder if the EPA will introduce a different testing method for diesels.
Lazy writing. "GM" "Diesel" ... let's talk about the 1980s diesel fiasco. Interesting writing would have been to research the roots of GM's modern European sourced diesels, or perhaps to talk about what the divestiture of Opel might mean to the long term place of diesel technology in the GM portfolio. Or, look at the controversy in Europe about what place diesel has in the ongoing development of automobiles there. But no, just go for the quick hit of saying what everyone already knows about the 1980s diesel fiasco.