Sergio Vs. Schneiderman: New York A.G. Dives Into the Fiat Chrysler Emissions Controversy

by Steph Willems

Published: January 13th, 2017

sergio vs schneiderman new york a g dives into the fiat chrysler emissions

Well known as a leading voice in the fight against climate change and a host of other progressive issues, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman now has Fiat Chrysler Automobiles in his sights.

After yesterday’s bombshell announcement from the Environmental Protection Agency, in which the regulator accused FCA of violating federal laws with its 3.0-liter diesel Jeep and Ram models, Scheiderman revealed that his office will investigate the automaker.

A noted environmental attack dog, Schneiderman isn’t the guy you want on your tail.

The EPA claims that it found at least eight auxiliary emissions control devices on diesel Jeep Grand Cherokee and Ram 1500 models. Those devices, which FCA did not reveal during the models’ certification process, cause the roughly 104,000 vehicles to emit excess nitrogen oxide pollution. That leads to smog, the EPA’s largest foe.

In a statement that draws obvious parallels with Volkswagen’s diesel scandal, assistant EPA administrator Cynthia Giles said, “Some of the devices appear to cause the vehicle to perform differently when being tested and when in use.”

FCA could face billions of dollars in fines if found guilty of evading emissions laws.

Late yesterday, Schneiderman issued a release claiming he was “deeply troubled” by the EPA evidence.

“My office will not tolerate attempts by any company to evade our environmental laws and pollute the air we breathe,” Schneiderman wrote. “As such, my office will investigate the claims against Fiat Chrysler and stands ready to work with our state and federal partners to ensure that any violations are pursued to the fullest extent of the law.”

FCA’s Sergio Marchionne wasn’t staying tight-lipped yesterday. The CEO blasted the EPA findings, claiming that his company operates above board and that its vehicles conform to regulations.

Speaking to reporters, Marchionne said FCA “has nothing in common” with Volkswagen’s diesel deception, adding that anyone who thinks otherwise is “smoking illegal material.”

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

#Diesel #Emissions #EPA #EricSchneiderman #Fca #FiatChryslerAutomobiles #LawAndOrder

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 14 comments

Tosh on Jan 13, 2017

NFW the ugly sweater troll actually used the words “smoking illegal material”?? Cuz, for one thing it turns out that it's more legal than HIS OWN VEHICLES. Bwa-hahahahaha....!

Like Reply
Jeff S on Jan 14, 2017

I have changed my opinion on diesels for cars, suvs, and half ton pickups. Since the EPA standards are so strict and the manufacturers have to rig the testing it might be better not to make diesels available in the US in lighter duty vehicles. This could be a final nail in FCA's coffin. Not worth the risk.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Jeff Self driving cars are not ready for prime time.
Lichtronamo Watch as the non-us based automakers shift more production to Mexico in the future.
28-Cars-Later " Electrek recently dug around in Tesla’s online parts catalog and found that the windshield costs a whopping $1,900 to replace.To be fair, that’s around what a Mercedes S-Class or Rivian windshield costs, but the Tesla’s glass is unique because of its shape. It’s also worth noting that most insurance plans have glass replacement options that can make the repair a low- or zero-cost issue. "Now I understand why my insurance is so high despite no claims for years and about 7,500 annual miles between three cars.
AMcA My theory is that that when the Big 3 gave away the store to the UAW in the last contract, there was a side deal in which the UAW promised to go after the non-organized transplant plants. Even the UAW understands that if the wage differential gets too high it's gonna kill the golden goose.
MKizzy Why else does range matter? Because in the EV advocate's dream scenario of a post-ICE future, the average multi-car household will find itself with more EVs in their garages and driveways than places to plug them in or the capacity to charge then all at once without significant electrical upgrades. Unless each vehicle has enough range to allow for multiple days without plugging in, fighting over charging access in multi-EV households will be right up there with finances for causes of domestic strife.