Mazda USA Senior VP Robert Davis 'Reassigned' After A Rough 2016

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

Mazda’s U.S. senior vice president for operations has been reassigned to a role in special assignments.

It does not appear to be a promotion.

Robert Davis, who held the position for more than half a decade, will no longer oversee all operations but will rather “lead teams in the ever-growing areas of recall compliance and cybersecurity, ” as well as legislation, regulations, and compliance.

Preaching patience, Mazda’s North American CEO Masahiro Moro revealed just last summer that, “ it will take Mazda two complete generations of new vehicles to fully transform itself.”

Patience may have waned, however, as the U.S. auto industry surged to an all-time record sales high in 2016 and Mazda volume tumbled 7 percent, driving the brand’s market share down to just 1.7 percent.

That was no way to successfully follow-up 2015’s performance, when Davis-led Mazda USA grew volume to a 21-year high.

2016 certainly had potential for Mazda, with a new MX-5 Miata picking up steam, a highly regarded replacement for the CX-9 after the first-generation was allowed to linger for nearly a decade, and a full calendar year for the new CX-3.

But the MX-5 is a niche player. The CX-9‘s ramp-up has been slow; only twice did Mazda report more than 2,000 monthly CX-9 sales in 2016, a feat the automaker accomplished six times with the thoroughly outdated first-gen CX-9 in 2013. And the CX-3, despite explosive growth in the subcompact crossover segment, hasn’t caught fire.

The bigger problem, of course, is that Mazda’s car sales plunged. While the symptoms are similar across the market, industry-wide volume was down 9 percent. Mazda’s already-small car lineup slid 14 percent compared with 2015. The Mazda 3 and Mazda 6 combined to lose nearly 25,000 sales.

Added to the 53-year-old Davis’s new role will be the coaching of a next generation of executives. Masahiro Moro said these changes are occurring so Mazda can “seize more than our fair share of this market shift,” and “to mentor new leaders and give those leaders a chance to play a part in the next chapter of the company’s success in the U.S.”

Moro says he will be “leaning heavily on Robert Davis to tap into his nearly 30 years of Mazda experience.”

Meanwhile, Mazda’s Ron Stettner, who was the vice president for sales and retail operations, has left the company. His replacement is Tom Donnelly. All of the changes are effective immediately.

A replacement for Robert Davis has not yet been announced.

When Davis was installed in as senior vice president for U.S. operations, Mazda’s then-North American CEO Jim O’Sullivan, said the organization was being reshaped “to fully realize Mazda’s U.S. growth potential in the next few years.”

O’Sullivan retired at the end of 2015.

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 55 comments
  • Jthorner Jthorner on Jan 27, 2017

    Give it up Mazda. Focus your energies on markets where you have a chance. You gave it the good fight in the USA for a long time, but you are now largely irrelevant. The rise of Hyundai/Kia and the resurgence of US based brands made second and third tier Japanese brands irrelevant. You are in the company of Isuzu and Mitsubishi now. Toyota, Honda and Nissan more than cover your market segment. Subaru successfully created a large niche brand of its own by being steadfastly different: boxer engines and all wheel drive for everything.

  • Ricky Spanish Ricky Spanish on Jan 27, 2017

    Great product doesn't matter if pricing is out of whack with the market, especially the lower end of the market.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next