NAIAS 2017: Chevrolet Just Trucked-up the Traverse, Finally Giving It a Shape

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Chevrolet’s current Traverse is an amorphous blob of rounded sheet metal. While not offensively homely, it lacks a distinctive silhouette or any purposeful styling. A layperson could be forgiven for confusing the globule with a minivan. However, with the Lambda platform being replaced by the C1XX, General Motors seized an opportunity to enhance the 2018 Traverse’s angles and make it more of a traditional-looking SUV — resulting in a more handsome and eerily truck-like crossover.

Undiminished in size, Chevrolet claims the squared-off CUV now provides more headroom and legroom for occupants in its second and third rows. Despite a wheelbase that’s two inches longer than its precursor, rear cargo space has been reduced to 23 cubic feet. That’s still enough to beat Ford’s Explorer, and the hold climbs to 98.5 cubic feet with all of the rear seats laid flat. Seven- and eight-passenger seating configurations will be offered on the new Traverse. More affordable versions will be equipped with benches for the second and third rows, while fancier editions will see that middle area replaced with two captain’s chairs.

GM is also offering the 2018 in two new trim levels — the debatably sporty RS and the suede-enhanced High Country.

The purportedly “sporting” RS version of the Traverse comes with a mandatory 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder and front-wheel drive. At 255 horses, it’s actually down on the base 3.6-liter V6 in terms of peak power, although it does offer superior fuel economy and slightly better torque (295 ft-lb).

Assuming that fuel economy isn’t your primary concern, the V6’s 305 hp and 260 lb-ft of torque seems to be a fine choice. That is doubly true if you plan on hauling anything, as Chevrolet suggests that the 3.6 liter should also be capable of a 5,000-pound towing capacity, making no mention of the turbo’s pulling might.

Compared to the previous generation, the Traverse has lost over 350 pounds, helping to improve fuel economy. Chevrolet estimates that FWD 3.6-liter V6 models will earn a 18/25 mpg city/highway rating, while the 2.0-liter four should yield 20/23 mpg. Regardless of the chosen motor, GM has given Traverse its Hydra-Matic 9T50 nine-speed automatic transmission.

While the RS’s black trim, big rims, and lackluster engine makes for an athletic appearance, the High Country trim is more like the genuine article. Offered as a luxury trim on other GM vehicles, the Traverse High Country will come with a unique leather interior, suede seats, D-Optic headlamps, all-wheel drive, electric-folding third row seating, and 20-inch polished wheels. It will also come with most of the available features, including Apple CarPlay, GM’s rear-seat reminder, 360-degree camera, Android Audio, hands-free liftgate, adaptive cruise control, and automated emergency breaking.

Chevrolet has not yet shared pricing, but considering where the Silverado High Country sits against the LTZ, as well as the 2017 Traverse Premiere’s $42,045 starting price, it wouldn’t be impossible to see the most lavishly equipped 2018s going for almost $50,000. Expect the lower L, LS, and LT trims to exist within the $30,000 and $40,000 range. However, General Motors should release specific pricing details and a sales date later this year.

[Images: General Motors]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 46 comments
  • OldManPants OldManPants on Jan 10, 2017

    Think I've now seen every available online photo of this. Phuc! It's gorgeous!

  • Corey Lewis Corey Lewis on Jan 10, 2017

    I'm surprised nobody mentioned the lettering down the side of the front doors. It's a bit much, placed quite high on the door, and spanning 50% of the width of it. Other than that, the styling is a huge improvement. I always thought the original Traverse looked pretty awful with the huge expanse of metal at the back, and the revised version was only slightly better.

  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could be made in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well.
  • Groza George I don’t care about GM’s anything. They have not had anything of interest or of reasonable quality in a generation and now solely stay on business to provide UAW retirement while they slowly move production to Mexico.
  • Arthur Dailey We have a lease coming due in October and no intention of buying the vehicle when the lease is up.Trying to decide on a replacement vehicle our preferences are the Maverick, Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5 or CX-30.Unfortunately both the Maverick and Subaru are thin on the ground. Would prefer a Maverick with the hybrid, but the wife has 2 'must haves' those being heated seats and blind spot monitoring. That requires a factory order on the Maverick bringing Canadian price in the mid $40k range, and a delivery time of TBD. For the Subaru it looks like we would have to go up 2 trim levels to get those and that also puts it into the mid $40k range.Therefore are contemplating take another 2 or 3 year lease. Hoping that vehicle supply and prices stabilize and purchasing a hybrid or electric when that lease expires. By then we will both be retired, so that vehicle could be a 'forever car'. And an increased 'carbon tax' just kicked in this week in most of Canada. Prices are currently $1.72 per litre. Which according to my rough calculations is approximately $5.00 per gallon in US currency.Any recommendations would be welcomed.
  • Eric Wait! They're moving? Mexico??!!
  • GrumpyOldMan All modern road vehicles have tachometers in RPM X 1000. I've often wondered if that is a nanny-state regulation to prevent drivers from confusing it with the speedometer. If so, the Ford retro gauges would appear to be illegal.
Next