QOTD: Which Forbidden Classic Would You Import?

Chris Tonn
by Chris Tonn

It’s the last week of the year, which means it’s time for end-of-year or new-year listicles. Time to recount all the celebrities who’ve passed, or to predict what will happen in the coming year. It’s a convenient time, certainly, as the turning of the calendar page allows one to mentally erase the past in favor of a potentially brighter future.

For guys like me, though, the lists of legally importable 25-year-old cars are the ones I’ll read the most. Heck, I wrote one last year.

To recap: the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration requires that any car not meeting US safety regulations be at least 25 years old (to the month of production) before it can be imported and used on American roads. Thus, the class of 1992 is of particular interest to me.

I’m rather surprised there seem to be few dealers doing mass imports of European cars. Japanese imports, likely spurred by the popularity of the R32-chassis Nissan Skyline, have been the mainstay of dealers such as Japanese Classics in Richmond, Virginia. As much as I’d love a Skyline or some other JDM beauty, I really dig the Euro forbidden fruit.

Thus, my choice is a 1992 Ford Escort RS Cosworth. Big power from a turbo Cosworth four-cylinder, all-wheel-drive, and that massive wing. I got a brief glimpse of one last year, and was not disappointed. I don’t know if it was brought Stateside under the “show and display” exemption, or if it was one of the Sun International cars that were legitimately federalized (thanks, Bozi!), but what a car either way.

This one for sale on eBay UK has been breathed on a bit by a tuner, which could limit the appeal for collectors, but should prove quite fun to drive. At 19,500 GBP (about $24,000 US currently) it seems to be a bargain. I’m sure I’ll be laughed out of here by some of you claiming that TTAC is on Ford’s payroll, but this is a seriously badass car.

Still, there are plenty of others cars that have been denied to US drivers over the years. I’m not limiting this to 1992 model year cars. What car, 25 years or older, would you bring in from overseas, and why?

Chris Tonn
Chris Tonn

Some enthusiasts say they were born with gasoline in their veins. Chris Tonn, on the other hand, had rust flakes in his eyes nearly since birth. Living in salty Ohio and being hopelessly addicted to vintage British and Japanese steel will do that to you. His work has appeared in eBay Motors, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars, Reader's Digest, AutoGuide, Family Handyman, and Jalopnik. He is a member of the Midwest Automotive Media Association, and he's currently looking for the safety glasses he just set down somewhere.

More by Chris Tonn

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 93 comments
  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next