GM's 'Super Cruise' Continues Its Slow Plod to Production

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

General Motors’ futuristic semi-autonomous driving technology now seems tinged with nostalgia.

The automaker’s “Super Cruise” self-driving function was first announced back in September 2014, but the new model many expected to be launched with the feature — the 2016 Cadillac CT6 — showed up without it.

Now, GM plans to debut the feature next year, and a recently intercepted letter from the federal government shows what to expect from the system.

Super Cruise allows drivers to let the vehicle take over some piloting duties on the highway and in traffic, but it’s not a fully autonomous system. It seems to be less capable than Tesla’s old Autopilot, but that could be on purpose. (We all remember the trouble that company’s self-driving system created.)

According to Reuters, a letter sent to GM from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration describes how vehicles equipped with the technology will automatically pull themselves over and stop, hazard lights flashing, if drivers go too hands-off.

The shutdown mode becomes activated if a road becomes too twisty for the system to navigate, or if a driver fails to respond to repeated alerts. Still, the country’s road safety regulator worried about the shutdown process. In its letter, NHTSA asked GM to “ensure that this fallback solution does not pose an unreasonable risk to safety.”

It seems that the shutdown mode is a drowsy driver’s best friend. A GM spokesperson told Reuters that Super Cruise includes facial recognition technology that issues alerts to prod a distracted or drowsy driver back to awareness. The alerts include a flashing gauge cluster light, seat vibrations, an audible warning, and eventually the voice of an OnStar representative.

If there’s no response, it’s assumed the driver is incapacitated and the system activates shutdown mode.

Barring another setback, expect to see Super Cruise offered on a Cadillac model sometime in 2017.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
9 of 28 comments
  • Funky Funky on Dec 03, 2016

    There are many pie in the sky promises being made in regard to these autonomous driving technologies. Reality sooner or later needs to set in. What happens when the autonomous car happens upon a horse drawn carriage? What happens when the thing comes around a blind corner/curve and encounters a tree branch or a rock? What does it do when deer or elk or moose are standing alongside the road (i.e. does it slow down to anticipate the possibility of the animal stepping onto the road?)? How does an autonomous vehicle pull a boat trailer or camping trailer or ATV trailer (or will all recreational vehicle trailers be outlawed in order to accommodate the autonomous cars?)? The same question applies to horse trailers and to equipment trailers and to all other trailers. It seems those pushing for autonomous vehicles don't spend a lot of time living with / interacting with real world driving situations because if they did they'd know better the realities faced by real people driving on real roads. Cadillac/GM, at least, seems to understand the need to move very very slowly when implementing these technologies. Because, in the real world, these systems are most likely going to have very limited applications.

    • See 5 previous
    • Ttacgreg Ttacgreg on Dec 05, 2016

      I would love to see how self driving car engineers think they can handle limited visibility, and snow and ice and slush on the road. If you can build a self driving system that can handle a raging blizzard, then I might be convinced.

  • Ttacgreg Ttacgreg on Dec 04, 2016

    ". A GM spokesperson told Reuters that Super Cruise includes facial recognition technology that issues alerts to prod a distracted or drowsy driver back to awareness." This Seems ironically appropriate that a system designed to disengage a driver from the act of driving then has to be capable of alerting the driver it has just put to sleep. This whole self driving car thing has never made any sense to me at all. Count me out. Anything past cruise control is overkill.

    • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Dec 04, 2016

      Read the article "Give the customer what he doesn't know he wants". You WILL be made to want it.

  • David Murilee Martin, These Toyota Vans were absolute garbage. As the labor even basic service cost 400% as much as servicing a VW Vanagon or American minivan. A skilled Toyota tech would take about 2.5 hours just to change the air cleaner. Also they also broke often, as they overheated and warped the engine and boiled the automatic transmission...
  • Marcr My wife and I mostly work from home (or use public transit), the kid is grown, and we no longer do road trips of more than 150 miles or so. Our one car mostly gets used for local errands and the occasional airport pickup. The first non-Tesla, non-Mini, non-Fiat, non-Kia/Hyundai, non-GM (I do have my biases) small fun-to-drive hatchback EV with 200+ mile range, instrument display behind the wheel where it belongs and actual knobs for oft-used functions for under $35K will get our money. What we really want is a proper 21st century equivalent of the original Honda Civic. The Volvo EX30 is close and may end up being the compromise choice.
  • Mebgardner I test drove a 2023 2.5 Rav4 last year. I passed on it because it was a very noisy interior, and handled poorly on uneven pavement (filled potholes), which Tucson has many. Very little acoustic padding mean you talk loudly above 55 mph. The forums were also talking about how the roof leaks from not properly sealed roof rack holes, and door windows leaking into the lower door interior. I did not stick around to find out if all that was true. No talk about engine troubles though, this is new info to me.
  • Dave Holzman '08 Civic (stick) that I bought used 1/31/12 with 35k on the clock. Now at 159k.It runs as nicely as it did when I bought it. I love the feel of the car. The most expensive replacement was the AC compressor, I think, but something to do with the AC that went at 80k and cost $1300 to replace. It's had more stuff replaced than I expected, but not enough to make me want to ditch a car that I truly enjoy driving.
  • ToolGuy Let's review: I am a poor unsuccessful loser. Any car company which introduced an EV which I could afford would earn my contempt. Of course I would buy it, but I wouldn't respect them. 😉
Next