Leaky Turbos, Unsecured Fuel Tanks Complete Today's Ford Recalls
Ford Motor Company has issued two safety-related recalls for around 9,400 North American vehicles, with both issues posing a fire risk.
The automaker is ordering back over 8,000 2017 Super Duty trucks that lack proper fuel tank strap reinforcements, in addition to roughly 1,300 other vehicles equipped with 3.5-liter EcoBoost engines.
Both safety issues carry an increased risk of fire for the affected units. Ford claims it is not currently aware of any fires, accidents or injuries related to the problems.
Improperly brazed turbocharger oil supply tubes were installed on 1,352 vehicles using Ford’s 3.5-liter GTDI engine, resulting in a poor fit that could leak engine oil onto the turbo and surrounding components. The company is concerned that, with the presence of an ignition source, the lubricant could start a fire. The affected models include 2016 Ford Taurus sedans, 2016-17 Flex crossovers, 2017 Explorers or Police Interceptor Utilities, and 2016-17 Lincoln MKT SUVs.
About 1,157 are in the U.S., while 126 are in Canada. Six more are in federalized territories.
The affected 2017 Super Duty trucks are missing reinforcement brackets that could lead to a fuel tank strap breaking away from the frame. The problem could cause the front of the fuel tank to make contact with the ground — damaging the tank and creating a fire hazard stemming from a fuel leak.
Affected vehicles include approximately 8,069 Ford Super Duty pickups assembled at Ford’s Kentucky Truck Plant between August 10, 2016 and September 17, 2016. Of the recalled units, 7,103 are in the United States, 964 more in Canada, and two are in federalized territories.
Ford dealers will install the correct parts for both recalls free of charge.
[Image: Ford Motor Company]
Jacob_coulter on Dec 22, 2016
Here come the Ford fanboys telling us that Ford has never had a quality control problem, in fact, it's Toyota that has all the quality control problems! I bet those early customers are really glad they went with the 5.0L instead of this 3.5 turbo charged monstrosity. It has had so many issues. Ford can't do turbos or diesels, look at their track record with the 6.7l Powerstroke diesels. Absolute nightmares. At least they didn't pair them to Ford's famous CVT or dual clutch PowerShift automatic.
Lou_BC on Dec 22, 2016
6.7L POWER STROKE PROBLEMS "COMMON 6.7L POWER STROKE PROBLEMS & CONCERNS Most problems with the 6.7L Power Stroke are isolated incidents - failures or faults experienced by a low percentage of owners, particularly on early engines. While issues are expected from a clean-slate engine, especially one as advanced as the 6.7L Power Stroke, there have been very few common issues with Ford's new diesel platform."
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Arthur Dailey For the Hornet less expensive interior materials/finishings, decontent just a little, build it in North America and sell it for less and everyone should be happy with both the Dodge and the Alfa.
- Bunkie I so wanted to love this car back in the day. At the time I owned a GT6+ and I was looking for something more modern. But, as they say, this car had *issues*. The first of which was the very high price premium for the V8. It was a several thousand dollar premium over the TR-7. The second was the absolutely awful fuel economy. That put me off the car and I bought a new RX-7 which, despite the thirsty rotary, still got better mileage and didn’t require premium fuel. I guess I wasn’t the only one who had this reaction because, two years later, I test-drove a leftover that had a $2,000 price cut. I don’t remember being impressed, the RX-7 had spoiled me with how easy it was to own. The TR-8 didn’t feel quick to me and it felt heavy. The first-gen RX was more in line with the idea of a light car that punched above its weight. I parted ways with both the GT6+ and the RX7 and, to this day, I miss them both.
- Fred Where you going to build it? Even in Texas near Cat Springs they wanted to put up a country club for sport cars. People complained, mostly rich people who had weekend hobby farms. They said the noise would scare their cows. So they ended up in Dickinson, where they were more eager for development of any kind.
- MaintenanceCosts I like the styling of this car inside and out, but not any of the powertrains. Give it the 4xe powertrain - or, better yet, a version of that powertrain with the 6-cylinder Hurricane - and I'd be very interested.
- Daniel J I believe anyone, at any level, should get paid as much as the market will bear. Why should CEOs have capped salaries or compensation but middle management shouldn't? If companies support poor CEOs and poor CEOs keep getting rewarded, it's up to the consumer and investors to force that company to either get a better CEO or to reduce the salary of that CEO. What I find hilarious is that consumers will continue to support companies where the pay for the CEOs is very high. And the same people complain. I stopped buying from Amazon during the pandemic. Everyone happily buys from them but the CEO makes bank. Same way with Walmart and many other retailers. Tim Cook got 100m in compensation last year yet people line up to buy Iphones. People who complain and still buy the products must not really care that much.