Volkswagen Figures It Can Keep Its Favorite Platform Around Basically Forever

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

In automotive terms, Volkswagen’s go-to MQB platform might end up having a lifespan somewhere between a Fox and a Panther.

Eager to stretch its meager dollars to Gumby-like proportions, the embattled automaker has announced that the platform underpinning most of its vehicles won’t die after two generations. Nah, let’s make it three, VW brand chief Herbert Diess said.

That means some vehicles, such as the stalwart Golf, will eventually ride on a platform old enough to drink in the United States.

According to Reuters, Diess told the German newspaper Boersen-Zeitung that keeping the MQB platform around for a little while longer — okay, a lot — should rake in the savings the company so desperately craves.

“In the past months we have worked on the cost side of MQB and made significant progress,” Diess said. “The MQB has high technical substance, so we can use it for the next two vehicle generations without further major investments.”

The modular platform, first used on the 2012 Golf, provides the backbone for VW’s small and midsize cars, crossovers and SUVs. The architecture also finds a home in some Audi small cars, as well as other VW Group products. Diess has said before that the MQB platform is a little too hoity toity for a volume compact like the Golf, hence the need to trim the expense.

Actually, there’s a laundry list of reasons why the automaker hit snooze on the MQB’s replacement. Volkswagen has promised to shave billions in expenses over the next few years as the company faces pressure on two fronts — paying off a Mt. Everest-sized pile of fines, settlements and litigation stemming from the diesel emissions scandal (the current tally stands at $16.5 billion in the U.S. alone), plus bringing to market a promised crop of electric vehicles.

Short of clipping coupons for Shake n’ Bake, cutting platform costs and building more utility vehicles is VW’s only fallback.

Speaking of the Golf, a refreshed version should appear any day now. The seventh generation model should soldier on in a lightly updated form for another few years.

[Image: Volkswagen of America]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 19 comments
  • Dan R Dan R on Nov 08, 2016

    It is only people who post here that worry about changes in suspension geometry. This is not rocket science, Surely, this all should have been worked out years ago. Only budgets prevents finessing the platforms.

  • Zackman Zackman on Nov 09, 2016

    I've heard this before - all complaints about an OEM keeping a platform around longer than some like. So what? On the surface, I see nothing but good reasons to keep an older platform around if it is a good one. That way, I assume continual improvements can be made to keep it current, thus making a car more reliable rather than constantly re-inventing the wheel, so to speak, as stated above.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I'd rather they have the old sweep gauges, the hhuuggee left to right speedometer from the 40's and 50's where the needle went from lefty to right like in my 1969 Nova
  • Buickman I like it!
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
Next