Aggressive Human Drivers Will Be Able to Bully Autonomous Cars

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Mercedes-Benz CEO Dietmar Exler thinks that the biggest problem autonomous vehicles will have to face is human drivers being dicks to them. We anticipate other unforeseen problems, but Exler’s prediction of automotive bullying seems like a safe bet.

There’s a number of ways to kick sand in a self-driving car’s face.

As Mercedes-Benz continues developing autonomous technology for its own fleet, Exler expressed to the Los Angeles Times that the company had some initial concerns about customer acceptance. Market research cleared that up fairly quickly. Exler is now convinced that anyone who experiences a vehicle that can drive itself in bumper-to-bumper traffic will suddenly become a convert. He also isn’t worried about insurance or liability issues, as he feels the technology is progressing rapidly.

What he is concerned about are of all the humans that might take advantage of a self-driving car.

Since autonomous cars are likely to be programmed to be courteous and regulated to be cautious, they should be extremely defensive drivers. This is something that is infrequently the case with flesh and blood operators, and Exler thinks that the more aggressive drivers will probably bully self-driving vehicles.

From the Times:

When someone tries to cut in line at a traffic merge, humans won’t let them in. But a driverless car will be programmed to stop when it sees an obstruction — like a line cutter. “They’ll look for the autonomous car and that’s where they’ll cut in,” (Exler) said.

That sort of thinking makes you wonder how many times an autonomous vehicle might be cheated out of its turn at a four-way stop, or how it might handle finding a parking spot in New York City traffic. While computer-controlled cars could certainly be programmed to be more aggressive, Exler doubts regulators would allow that. They will likely be intentionally passive by design and mandated to follow speed limits and traffic laws.

Exler says that even if driverless cars were mainstreamed today, they’d still be sharing the road with regular vehicles for decades. So, until they take away the right to drive, humans and computers will have to coexist on the road. That means people with autonomous vehicles will have to relax and take the occasional beating in traffic or disengage their autopilot and mix it up with the rest of us.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 44 comments
  • Sector 5 Sector 5 on Nov 20, 2016

    Seems even computers can't undo the "pleasures," of high density living. Those humans that cause accidents with autonomous vehicles should get dumped in the insurance faculty by their insurer and pay $$$thousands in premiuns.

  • Mechimike Mechimike on Nov 21, 2016

    "until they take away the right to drive..." Did this send a chill up anyone else's spine, or was that just me? Also: I don't see "right to drive" in the Constitution anywhere. But still.

  • FreedMike I'd say that question is up to the southern auto workers. If I were in their shoes, I probably wouldn't if the wages/benefits were at at some kind of parity with unionized shops. But let's be clear here: the only thing keeping those wages/benefits at par IS the threat of unionization.
  • 1995 SC So if they vote it down, the UAW gets to keep trying. Is there a means for a UAW factory to decide they no longer wish to be represented and vote the union out?
  • Lorenzo The Longshoreman/philosopher Eri Hoffer postulated "Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and ends up as a racket." That pretty much describes the progression of the United Auto Workers since World War II, so if THEY are the union, the answer is 'no'.
  • Redapple2 I think I ve been in 100 plants. ~ 20 in Mexico. ~10 Europe. Balance usa. About 1/2 nonunion. I supervised UAW skilled trades guys at GM Powertrain for 6 years. I know the answer.PS- you do know GM products - sales weighted - average about 40% USA-Canada Content.
  • Jrhurren Unions and ownership need to work towards the common good together. Shawn Fain is a clown who would love to drive the companies out of business (or offshored) just to claim victory.
Next