No Fixed Abode: Mr. Trump's (Not So) Wild Ride

Jack Baruth
by Jack Baruth

They say that Donald Trump is Literally Hitler. That he is the reincarnation of Adolf Hitler. That he believes all the things that Hitler believed. That his plan to restrict illegal immigration is literally equivalent to killing six million people. He says he can build a peaceful relationship with Russia instead of having an awesome progressive war over Syria. Guess what? HITLER ALSO BUILT A PEACEFUL RELATIONSHIP WITH RUSSIA. Before attacking Russia. It’s true. Look in an old racist history book and you can see that Hitler made peace with Russia in nineteen-something, right before he sent Messerschmitt Bf109s to attack peaceful villagers in Mexico, or Spain, or whatever.

Alright, so all of that might be a bit exaggerated, although if you’re one of the participation-trophy Millennials who is currently milling about a Starbucks in an attempt to overturn a democratic election, you probably don’t believe in that.

But what if it had been true? What if Donald J. Trump wasn’t just a businessman, hustler, and television personality who managed to elevate himself to the Presidency mostly on his own dime despite being stabbed in the back by everybody from CNN to Paul Ryan, but instead he was literally Hitler?

Well, if you’re a student of pre-war German history like I was as a child, you know that he would immediately insist on a few things: a revival of traditional culture, full employment, and … wait for it … a People’s Car.

What would that look like? What would the American Folks-Wagon be?

Let’s start with the price; that’s the easiest thing to figure out. German Wikipedia says the target price for the KdF-Wagen, the state-sponsored Beetle, was set at 990 Reichsmarks, which would be about 4,100 Euro today. That’s a tough calculation to accurately make, but let’s say that it’s in the neighborhood. The People’s Car was priced to compete with plain-Jane motorcycles. Today’s Honda CB500 series bikes retail for about six grand. Let’s say $7,999.

Who would build it? Hitler thought in terms of vertical integration; his concept was for the State to build the car, employ the people, control the price, and handle the marketing. But it’s worth noting that the United States beat Hitler in World War II partially by letting existing factories build designs that the government had approved; that’s why many “Colt” automatic pistols from the era were actually built by typewriter maker Remington Rand, and it’s why Ford built everything from Jeeps to bombers. So maybe the best thing to do would be to settle on a very strict design spec and let companies bid for the business of building it. The only caveat, of course, would be this: 100-percent American content, or as close to 100 percent as could be reasonably managed. It ain’t that tough, you know. Toyota almost does it with the Camry.

Engineering and design would be paid for by the United States Government. This would do more to lower the price than you realize. It’s common for a new platform to cost north of two billion (with a “B”) dollars nowadays. That’s a lot of money, but it’s a rounding error in government scale. We’re droppin’ seventy-five Bees on food stamps every year. Let’s not even talk about what the F-35 cost.

The production term of the American People’s Car would be set at 10 years. That’s long enough for tooling and fixed costs to be completely amortized in a manner that doesn’t cripple the balance sheet. And we’d start with an existing engine/transmission combination. It would be tempting to just eminent-domain an existing car design altogether — last-gen Nissan Versa/Dacia Logan, I’m looking at you — but that wouldn’t give a new generation of American engineers a chance to learn and grow. Remember that the People’s Car isn’t just a car; it’s a way to elevate people out of poverty.

That doesn’t mean that we can’t use the old Versa as a template in terms of footprint and features. The car should be the biggest box possible, made as cheaply as possible, with a full suite of safety features. It should be modular, so it could be easily switched to hybrid or electric power. And the entire technical plan of the car, from CAD files to production-line schematics, should be made freely available to the American public. In other words: open-source the mother.

We’re long past the era of “stamp books,” which is the way that people “financed” the KdF-Wagen. THE_CURRENT_YEAR is a place where people like their gratification now and their payback later. But there’s a problem: the average American doesn’t have the credit necessary to finance a $7,999 car. Not a problem. The government will finance anybody who is eligible for the Earned Income Credit by simply taking the credit back until the car’s paid off. Sign and drive. Alternately, we could just have people sign over their tax refunds to the government until their balance on the car is zero.

So that’s how we’d do it. A $7,999 car in every garage. But why would we do it? The answer is simple, and it’s the same answer that the real Hitler had for starting the program. When you put the working poor of a country into a reliable vehicle, they can get to work. They can get to child care. Their lives become significantly more predictable. Safer, too — wouldn’t you rather have America’s children in a new car instead of a ’96 Explorer? I think we could distribute a million cars a year to the poorest Americans. Think of the jobs it would create, too. If you want to get all (Bill) Clinton-esque about it, you could start by hiring people who are on public assistance now. Hire all the veterans who came back from Afghanistan with nightmares and scars only to find their hometown factories closed. Hire the disadvantaged people whose hopelessness has turned them to violence.

The biggest winners in all of this, besides the American people? Wait for it: the automakers. By and large, they despise being in the small car business. They do it for CAFE and to keep the government off their backs. Well, those days are gone, as my dearest love Este Haim would say. CAFE will be adjusted. Everybody’s free to go build upscale crap. The American people will be just fine without the Cruze and the Focus and the Elantra.

That’s the plan. Over to you, Mr. Trump. Here’s your chance to be literally Hitler. It’s good for America, it’s good for all of us — even the spoiled brats who are marching in the streets right now to protest an election. Let’s put them in cars, too. And tint the windows, so I don’t have to look at them, okay?

Jack Baruth
Jack Baruth

More by Jack Baruth

Comments
Join the conversation
15 of 284 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Nov 12, 2016

    It is a great day in America - one half of population is in the war with another. I never seen a country as divided as America. Important thing though is that Hillary with her war mongering did not get elected. If she was elected there would be war with Russia and I can assure you Russia most like would win because unlike America Russia is a united country and Russians can fight for their country last man standing as Germans found out hard way.

    • See 12 previous
    • Fendertweed Fendertweed on Nov 15, 2016

      @Lou_BC, Thanks for your reply. I don't think using "neoliberal" advances the point or is necessarily accurate (I studied poli sci etc., but tend to reject such labeling as often not helpful) --- but I agree with almost everything in your last post (11/14/16 10:21 pm).

  • Wumpus Wumpus on Nov 14, 2016

    Message to Mr. Trump. We have cars. We've had cars since Hank Ford dreamed up the model T. If you want to be a proper 21st century tyrant, we need a people's *plane*. Preferably with autopilot enabled because I live in Maryland and don't want Marylanders flying over my home. This message is about a week late because it didn't hit me until now (when I looked at the subtitle).

  • Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
Next