Ram Product Placement Film Looks Awful, and the Studio Knows It

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Having your vehicles prominently featured in a big-ticket Hollywood film is any automaker’s dream, but Ram’s starring role in the upcoming movie Monster Trucks has turned into a nightmare.

Apparently, the film is so awful that Paramount Pictures has delayed its release three times and taken the odd step of booking a $115 million impairment charge, Automotive News reports. A write-down, in other words.

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles wants the promotion, but could it end up gaining notoriety by starring in a mega-dud?

When the studio basically states loud and clear that it expects to lose money on a box office stinker, it’s not an ideal place for any automaker. FCA chief marketing officer Olivier Francois might want to leave it off his list of accomplishments.

The movie stars Lucas Till (born in 1990) as a high school student who shelters aliens with the help of his friends, including a girl he’ll totally kiss by the end of the movie. Oh, and the aliens take up residence inside Ram trucks, giving them super powers. Monster Trucks…get it?

The movie’s trailer, which is unwatchably bad, only broadcasts to would-be viewers that this flick is an epic turkey in the making. We’re talking about a “10” on the Pluto Nash scale. According to the Wall Street Journal, the movie’s plot was hatched from the fertile minds of a former studio president and his four-year-old son, so Paramount has no one to blame but itself.

For FCA, the situation couldn’t be more different than 1996, when its Dodge Ram pickup warranted third billing alongside Bill Paxton and Helen Hunt in Twister. That role helped Dodge move its recently redesigned merchandise, because who doesn’t like watching flying cows?

Not everyone is convinced Monster Trucks is a bad thing for Ram. Stacy Jones, CEO of Hollywood Branded, tells Automotive News that FCA’s gambit could still pay off.

“There is a lot of value there, even if the film is a horrible bomb,” Jones said. “As a marketer, you can hit a segment audience, target a specific consumer demographic” with a movie product placement.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 27 comments
  • MaxHedrm MaxHedrm on Oct 11, 2016

    Even adjusting for the fact that those are all the best scenes in the movie, it doesn't look THAT bad. High art, it's not. But it's amusing, the trailer made me laugh.

  • Drzhivago138 Drzhivago138 on Oct 11, 2016

    I'll wait for the RiffTrax.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next