Mercedes' Inline-Six Makes the Rest of Its Impressive New Motors Look Like Mechanical Plebs

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Mercedes-Benz is introducing a host of new engines with clever shared modular components, including a standard 500cc cylinder displacement.

These new engines include a new AMG-developed twin-turbocharged V8 for the S-Class and one of the most encouraging mechanical additions to the automotive landscape seen in a while — a high-tech inline-six specifically designed to compete with, and outclass, larger motors.

While Mercedes wants to keep you interested with claims of vastly improved economy across platforms, enhanced efficiency is definitely not the most impressive bit of engineering on offer. For example, the aforementioned inline six-cylinder features 48-volt systematic electrification, so there’s no belt drive for ancillary components at the front of the engine. This reduces the overall length of what would normally be a fairly long motor and frees it up for packaging in areas that may have not worked otherwise.

Those 48 volts also work with the engine’s electric turbocharger. Mercedes claims that it only takes the e-turbo 0.3 second to reach 70,000 rpm, followed by the larger twin-scroll exhaust-driven turbo. The intended result is seamless linear power delivery without any turbo lag. The new inline-six is rated by the company to “at least” 408 horsepower and 369 lb-ft of torque and Mercedes says it’ll come in silky smooth with 15 percent better CO2 emissions than the current V6 being offered.

The other spec sheet darling is the slightly lower tech M176 twin-turbo 4.0-liter V8. Although, on paper, this engine looks very similar to the 4.0 biturbo that Mercedes-Benz is already producing, right down to the matching 17 pounds per square inch of boost pressure.

Mercedes says this V8 will output over 476 hp and 516 lb-ft in the upcoming 2017 S-Class with a 10 percent improvement in economy — partly due to cylinder deactivation. However, cylinder shutoff is only active in an engine-speed range of 900 to 3,250 rpm and only when the vehicle operator has selected one of two conservative driving modes. Otherwise, it’s a full-time V8.

In addition to two diesel engines that are somewhat less likely to show up in North America, Benz is also offering a practical 2.0-liter turbo four for next year’s more economic models. The package includes twin-scroll turbochargers that merge the exhaust gas ducts of cylinder pairs into a “flow-optimized” manifold. Mercedes says this setup aids in the production of low-rpm torque. The engine also has a belt-driven 48-volt starter-alternator that is responsible for for fuel-saving hybrid functions such as energy recovery, imperceptible on/off at stops, and boosting the engine-speed range up to 2,500 rpm.

[Images: Mercedes-Benz]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 54 comments
  • Noble713 Noble713 on Nov 01, 2016

    Hopefully Japan will follow Germany's lead, and this will convince Toyota and Nissan to make inline sixes again. I want a successor to the JZ, dammit!

    • Caboose Caboose on Nov 01, 2016

      3.6L I-6 Lexus RC, please, minus 300-400 pounds. -OR- 2.0 I-6 Miata at its current weight. -OR- 4.2L I-6 Lexus LS. -OR- Yay! I love mixing Japanese cars, I-6 lust, and lots of poppies!

  • Carl0s Carl0s on Nov 01, 2016

    It's just a shame Mercedes lag behind with their own gearboxes while everybody else uses ZF or Aisin. 48v will soon be the norm. Another manufacturer was saying it was becoming a necessity.

    • JimZ JimZ on Nov 02, 2016

      I see interior electronics staying 12 volt for a while. 42/48 volt systems have safety implications that 12 volt does not.

  • Jkross22 When I think about products that I buy that are of the highest quality or are of great value, I have no idea if they are made as a whole or in parts by unionized employees. As a customer, that's really all I care about. When I think about services I receive from unionized and non-unionized employees, it varies from C- to F levels of service. Will unionizing make the cars better or worse?
  • Namesakeone I think it's the age old conundrum: Every company (or industry) wants every other one to pay its workers well; well-paid workers make great customers. But nobody wants to pay their own workers well; that would eat into profits. So instead of what Henry Ford (the first) did over a century ago, we will have a lot of companies copying Nike in the 1980s: third-world employees (with a few highly-paid celebrity athlete endorsers) selling overpriced products to upper-middle-class Americans (with a few urban street youths willing to literally kill for that product), until there are no more upper-middle-class Americans left.
  • ToolGuy I was challenged by Tim's incisive opinion, but thankfully Jeff's multiple vanilla truisms have set me straight. Or something. 😉
  • ChristianWimmer The body kit modifications ruined it for me.
  • ToolGuy "I have my stance -- I won't prejudice the commentariat by sharing it."• Like Tim, I have my opinion and it is perfect and above reproach (as long as I keep it to myself). I would hate to share it with the world and risk having someone critique it. LOL.
Next