Dud or Stud? Chevy's Diesel Cruze Gambit Offers No Guarantee of Success

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

General Motors is surprisingly boastful when it speaks of the upcoming Chevrolet Cruze Diesel, especially its newfound role as a warm Linus blanket offered to disenfranchised Volkswagen owners.

We’ve been told there’ll be manual transmissions galore, and lets-just-pretend-it’s-a-wagon hatchback variants, too. Now, GM claims a sporty RS version is in the works, which it believes will have VW owners scrambling to trade in their peace signs for bow ties.

Will buyers be kind to the new (and legal) “Whisper Diesel” or is this just an oily pipe dream?

One month before the Environmental Protection Agency blew open the diesel emissions scandal in September of 2015, the German automaker’s TDI models accounted for nearly 58 percent of the diesel light vehicle market in the U.S. Buyers were sold on the attributes of the high-mileage, torquey, four-cylinder units.

Five years ago, a VW dealer told this writer that he’d still sell every vehicle on his lot if 50 percent of them were diesels. Sadly, he claimed, head office only allowed a 25-percent diesel mix.

Now, GM has high hopes that TDI owners facing a buyback will trade their dirty “clean” diesel for a legitimately clean 1.6-liter diesel. Dan Nicholson, GM’s vice president for global propulsion systems, says that a good number of former owners “won’t stop wishing for a diesel.”

“And we’ll go after those customers,” he told Automotive News in August.

An RS variant is the latest promise for the diverse 2018 Cruze Diesel lineup, which bows in late summer or early fall of next year. Speaking to Motor Authority, GM North America president Alan Batey claims the diesel RS will be “fun to drive,” making that point more than once.

“You take this look, and you take those performance parts, and you marry it with a diesel,” he said, adding again, “This will be fun to drive.”

That could be true — if output matches the 136 horsepower and 236 lb-ft of torque seen in the 2018 Equinox. However, GM’s plans have already found its critics.

Speaking to The Detroit News, Michelle Krebs, senior analyst at Autotrader.com, claims the diesel push has nothing to do with sales.

“I think it’s purely a fuel economy play, as we move closer to fuel economy standards,” Krebs said. “I suspect the take-rate will be very low after the whole Volkswagen situation.”

Speculation has swirled around the model’s fuel economy, with a potential 50 mile per gallon highway figure mentioned. If the Cruze Diesel’s mileage comes close to that, not only would it be a highly marketable claim, but the automaker’s corporate average fuel economy would see a welcome boost.

As GM crosses its fingers, time will tell if the American diesel renaissance recovers from its near-dead state.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 56 comments
  • Tjh8402 Tjh8402 on Oct 19, 2016

    Price will be a big deal. I've got my eye on this as well as a Civic turbo hatch to replace my Abarth. If I continue driving this much, I'm going to need something with better mpg and more readily available service locations, and I'd like have some more cargo space as well. The challenge for Chevy will be to make the diesel's likely higher price worthwhile compared to the Civic, and both will have an uphill battle against a nicely depreciated Fiesta, Fit, Focus, or Mazda 3

  • 05lgt 05lgt on Oct 19, 2016

    If GM has figured out how to mimic the (non-frost heaved western and southern) highway manners of the VW's it might work. If they design the suspension for Detroit... wrong buyers.

  • SCE to AUX The nose went from terrible to weird.
  • Chris P Bacon I'm not a fan of either, but if I had to choose, it would be the RAV. It's built for the long run with a NA engine and an 8 speed transmission. The Honda with a turbo and CVT might still last as long, but maintenance is going to cost more to get to 200000 miles for sure. The Honda is built for the first owner to lease and give back in 36 months. The Toyota is built to own and pass down.
  • Dwford Ford's management change their plans like they change their underwear. Where were all the prototypes of the larger EVs that were supposed to come out next year? Or for the next gen EV truck? Nowhere to be seen. Now those vaporware models are on the back burner to pursue cheaper models. Yeah, ok.
  • Wjtinfwb My comment about "missing the mark" was directed at, of the mentioned cars, none created huge demand or excitement once they were introduced. All three had some cool aspects; Thunderbird was pretty good exterior, let down by the Lincoln LS dash and the fairly weak 3.9L V8 at launch. The Prowler was super cool and unique, only the little nerf bumpers spoiled the exterior and of course the V6 was a huge letdown. SSR had the beans, but in my opinion was spoiled by the tonneau cover over the bed. Remove the cover, finish the bed with some teak or walnut and I think it could have been more appealing. All three were targeting a very small market (expensive 2-seaters without a prestige badge) which probably contributed. The PT Cruiser succeeded in this space by being both more practical and cheap. Of the three, I'd still like to have a Thunderbird in my garage in a classic color like the silver/green metallic offered in the later years.
  • D Screw Tesla. There are millions of affordable EVs already in use and widely available. Commonly seen in Peachtree City, GA, and The Villages, FL, they are cheap, convenient, and fun. We just need more municipalities to accept them. If they'll allow AVs on the road, why not golf cars?
Next