Now a Self-Driving Technology and Mobility Player, Ford Seeks an Edge


Taking to a Dearborn stage on Monday, Ford Motor Company CEO Mark Fields declared, “We are expanding our business to be both an auto and mobility company.” With this statement, Fields has created additional competition. No longer will Ford only be battling traditional auto manufacturers.
Now, the automaker’s competitors include Uber, Lyft, Google, and Apple — each one focused on current and future mobility solutions. How does the company plan to win?
While Ford’s race to build an autonomous vehicle isn’t unique to the automotive industry, it illustrates how auto manufacturers are looking to and planning for the future. During his time on stage, Fields talked extensively about Ford Smart Mobility. This is the company’s plan to lead the industry in vehicle connectivity, vehicle mobility, autonomous vehicles, customer experience, and data & analytics. The plan’s end game? Affordable, fully autonomous vehicles, available to both consumers and businesses. (Or so Ford hopes.)
This also will lead to Ford changing its business model. Ford will go from a company entirely dependent on vehicles sales to one dependent on vehicle sales as well as transportation services. The reasoning behind this change in philosophy is influenced by the following:
Every minute in the United States, thirty new vehicles are sold.
During that same minute, seven million miles are driven, 125,000 taxis and Ubers are on the road, there are 60,000 shared rides, 450,000 bytes are transmitted between connected vehicles, and 350,000 apps are downloaded.
Ford wants a piece of that action. As Americans increasingly look at vehicle usage differently, Fields believes that Ford’s continued existence depends on providing transportation services and solutions. The first step will be to start a shuttle service to supplement public transportation in major metropolitan areas by the beginning of the next decade.

Central to all of these plans is the fully autonomous vehicle. Fields believes that autonomous vehicles will have a significant impact on society — an impact as significant as Ford’s moving assembly line. Ford will attempt to once again, “Make people’s lives better by changing the way the world moves.”
Since the autonomous vehicle is supposed to change how the world moves, how does it move? Luckily, Ford set up a demonstration on how these vehicles function on public roads. Over the last year, Ford has adding a suite of sensors to a number of Fusion Hybrids. Currently, Ford fits a high resolution color camera, short and long range radar, LIDAR, stereo cameras, and monocular cameras to their test vehicles. Paired with software development, these sensors give the Fusions the ability to drive without human input.
In order to get to this stage, Ford has partnered, invested in, or purchased four different technology companies. These companies have helped with advanced algorithms, 3D mapping, LIDAR, and radar and camera sensors. Ford also is expanding its Silicon Valley operations, creating a dedicated campus in Palo Alto. This campus has new facilities and will be doubling the size of the staff by next year.
Ford has done testing at M-City, the State of Michigan’s autonomous vehicle test site, its proving grounds, and on public roads. These vehicles are referred to as an SAE Level 4 Autonomous Vehicle. They can operate independently within a geographically fenced area. The roads these vehicles travel are all mapped and verified. This is the same level autonomous vehicle that Ford will be rolling out to vehicle and livery services by 2021.
Besides the weird-looking roof rack, there is nothing particularly remarkable about these Fusions. Once inside, the cabin’s appointments are standard Ford fare. An engineer sits in the drivers seat, ready to take over the wheel in an emergency. Ford doesn’t want an autonomous Fusion getting ideas from your average Mustang leaving a Cars and Coffee event. Another engineer sits in the front passenger seat, viewing the data from the vehicles array of sensors.
Once the car is put in “L”, the computer takes over. Slowly accelerating through the parking lot, the Fusion scans the area for pedestrians, doors opening, and other obstacles. It then comes to a rest at a stop sign, turns right, and we’re out on a public road.

Throughout the drive, the test vehicle navigates four way stops, stop lights, pedestrian crossings, and curvy roads. Even the most sinister of all traffic maneuvers, the unprotected left turn, is no match for the Fusion. The vehicle is able to handle all of the real world situations this two mile course could offer. The various sensors send information back to the vehicle on when it is safe to proceed, make a turn, and at what speed. Acceleration and deceleration are smooth, and the steering is precise. It’s almost exactly like riding in a vehicle driven by a human.
Compared to a human driver, safety and compliance are the most obvious differences in the way an autonomous vehicle drives. The autonomous Fusion is the most cautiously driven vehicle not belonging to a drivers’ ed school. It makes complete stops, puts the turn signal on ahead of time, and yields to other vehicles at four-way stops. It also drives exactly at the speed limit and obeys all state-mandated rules of the road. A good example of this is when the vehicle came to a flashing crosswalk. In Michigan, cars must not drive through a flashing crosswalk, even if there are no pedestrians crossing the road. However, that didn’t stop two non-autonomous vehicles from driving through a flashing crosswalk during the test drive. The autonomous Fusion waited patiently until the lights stopped flashing.
After taking a ride in a self-driving vehicle, it’s not hard to see that they will make roads safer and change the way we view transportation. Vehicles will now be able to be utilized on a 24/7 basis with the biggest liability — humans — removed from the driving picture.
After a short ride and some discussion with engineers, Ford’s vision of profitability through transportation services and solutions becomes more clear. I just have one unanswered question: if four autonomous cars roll up to a four-way stop at the same time, who goes first?
[Graph: Ford Motor Company]

More by Adam Tonge
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- 28-Cars-Later "But Assemblyman Phil Ting, the San Franciscan Democrat who wrote the electric school bus legislation, says this is all about the health and wellbeing of Golden State residents. In addition to the normal air pollution stemming from exhaust gasses, he believes children are being exposed to additional carcinogens by just being on a diesel bus."Phil is into real estate, he doesn't know jack sh!t about science or medicine and if media were real it would politely remind him his opinions are not qualified... if it were real. Another question if media were real is why is a very experienced real estate advisor and former tax assessor writing legislation on school busses? If you read the rest of his bio after 2014, his expertise seems to be applied but he gets into more and more things he's not qualified to speak to or legislate on - this isn't to say he isn't capable of doing more but just two years ago Communism™ kept reminding me Dr. Fauxi knew more about medicine than I did and I should die or something. So Uncle Phil just gets a pass with his unqualified opinions?Ting began his career as a real estate financial adviser at Arthur Andersen and CBRE. He also previously served as the executive director of the Asian Law Caucus, as the president of the Bay Area Assessors Association, and on the board of Equality California. [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phil_Ting#cite_note-auto-1][1][/url][h3][/h3]In 2005, Ting was appointed San Francisco Assessor-Recorder in 2005 by Mayor Gavin Newsom, becoming San Francisco’s highest-ranking Chinese-American official at the time. He was then elected to the post in November 2005, garnering 58 percent of the vote.Ting was re-elected Assessor-Recorder in 2006 and 2010During his first term in the Assembly, Ting authored a law that helped set into motion the transformation of Piers 30-32 into what would become Chase Center the home of the Golden State Warriorshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phil_Ting
- RHD This looks like a lead balloon. You could buy a fantastic classic car for a hundred grand, or a Mercedes depreciationmobile. There isn't much reason to consider this over many other excellent vehicles that cost less. It's probably fast, but nothing else about it is in the least bit outstanding, except for the balance owed on the financing.
- Jeff A bread van worthy of praise by Tassos.
- Jeff The car itself is in really good shape and it is worth the money. It has lots of life left in it and can easily go over 200k.
- IBx1 Awww my first comment got deletedTake your “millennial anti theft device” trope and wake up to the fact that we’re the only ones keeping manuals around.
Comments
Join the conversation
But what about Mark Fields' suit? You need to be asking the tough questions!
As long as those looking to put their freely obtained Yellen notes look at actual profitability when pricing car companies, while applying dot com valuation rigor when looking at "mobility companies", being a "Mobility company" is undoubtedly good for shareholders.