Ace of Base: Mazda CX-3 Sport

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Sometimes a manufacturer churns out a base trim that is — all things considered — the primo choice for that particular model. Here’s an example.

Yes, yes, yes. I know. Another bloody crossover. But before you scroll down to re-read one of Jack’s breathless exploits or Sajeev’s rants on automotive style, permit me the following: what would happen if Mazda spent all its R&D budget shoehorning a rotary engine into the upcoming MX-5 RF?

They’d go bankrupt, that’s what would happen. While the keyboard warriors inhabiting dusty corners of the internet would undoubtedly put down their stale popcorn long enough to cheer, the rest of the world (y’know, those of us who actually buy cars) would read the rotary reviews with interest then promptly stampede to a competing dealer to sign on the dotted line for something with a high beltline and a modicum of practicality.

In base Sport trim, the CX-3 stickers at a take-out dinner under $20,000, yet sees fit to include such niceties as air conditioning, a seven-inch touch screen billboard, and a helpful backup camera. All-wheel drive is a $1,250 option and wholly unnecessary unless your backyard decor includes — as mine did for eighteen years — polar bears and a couple of icebergs. An angry version of Mazda’s KODO design language makes the base CX-3 one of the more stylish options in this category to this jaundiced eye, particularly when slathered in a few gallons of $0 Dynamic Blue Mica paint.

The SKYACTIV-G 2.0-liter engine sees fit to channel a pleasingly symmetrical 146 horsepower and 146 pounds-feet of torque. Acceleration is helped by the CX-3’s diet of Lean Cuisines, contributing to curb weight well under 3,000 pounds, 200 lbs less than a base Jeep Renegade. Mazda’s six-speed auto is the sole transmission of choice but manages to avoid any sort of comparisons to slushboxes of yore. The suspension is firm enough to recall Mazda’s core values of sportiness and a rip to the redline will help you forget, if only for a moment, that you got talked into buying a subcompact crossover.

Sure, our ME wasn’t totally enamoured with this thing, but he’s generally delusional (as proven by his decisions about moving day). I will agree the CX-3’s value proposition loses its luster as it zoom-zooms its way into the high $20,000 bracket, and rear seat space is poor for anyone past the fifth grade. At the instant ramen end of the subcompact crossover scale, however, the base CX-3 checks many of the right boxes. Now, do the sensible thing and go buy a Mazda3 hatchback instead.

Not every base model has aced it. The ones which have? They help make our automotive landscape a lot better. Any others you’d like to see in our series? Let us know in the comments. Naturally, feel free to eviscerate our selections.

The model above is shown with American options and is priced in Freedom Dollars. As always, your dealer will probably sell for less.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 36 comments
  • APaGttH APaGttH on Sep 14, 2016

    One thing Mazda has had right since there has been a Mazda is their paint colors. Mazda has amazing color availability on their vehicles. The only two companies that do red better is Porsche and Ferrari - for one example.

    • Drzhivago138 Drzhivago138 on Sep 14, 2016

      Except you can only get a CX-5 Sport (the only trim available with a stick) in black and gray.

  • Funky Funky on Sep 15, 2016

    The CX-3 isn't a bad vehicle. The driving dynamics are not as impressive/fun as the CX-5, but it is a smaller and less expensive vehicle. The interior design, in the GT trim, appears to be high-end and it looks nicely modern. I really like the round air vents. The front seats are comfortable, with proper side bolstering. At higher revs, the engine note is very noticeable and sounds proper for a small "driver oriented" vehicle. It is very quick to start at red lights. The back seats are useable if the front seats are adjusted to the middle front/back adjustment. And, overall, it is a decent and relatively inexpensive compact 4WD hatchback. I recently had an opportunity to spend some time driving one of these. If this is your sort of thing, I'd recommend one. And, because I was impressed with it, I bought one for myself (a new 2017 GT which hasn't yet been delivered to me). I'll keep you posted on my (and my kid's...who recently started driving) continued experience with it. I hope that it proves to be a good vehicle for my family to share.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh [h3]Wake me up when it is a 1989 635Csi with a M88/3[/h3]
  • BrandX "I can charge using the 240V outlets, sure, but it’s slow."No it's not. That's what all home chargers use - 240V.
  • Jalop1991 does the odometer represent itself in an analog fashion? Will the numbers roll slowly and stop wherever, or do they just blink to the next number like any old boring modern car?
  • MaintenanceCosts E34 535i may be, for my money, the most desirable BMW ever built. (It's either it or the E34 M5.) Skeptical of these mods but they might be worth undoing.
  • Arthur Dailey What a load of cow patties from fat cat politicians, swilling at the trough of their rich backers. Business is all for `free markets` when it benefits them. But are very quick to hold their hands out for government tax credits, tax breaks or government contracts. And business executives are unwilling to limit their power over their workers. Business executives are trained to `divide and conquer` by pitting workers against each other for raises or promotions. As for the fat cat politicians what about legislating a living wage, so workers don't have to worry about holding down multiple jobs or begging for raises? And what about actually criminally charging those who hire people who are not legally illegible to work? Remember that it is business interests who regularly lobby for greater immigration. If you are a good and fair employer, your workers will never feel the need to speak to a union. And if you are not a good employer, then hopefully 'you get the union that you deserve'.
Next