2018 Chevrolet Equinox Revealed With Malibu-esque Styling, Turbo Engine Lineup, Diesel Option

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Chevrolet has lifted the curtain on its next-generation Equinox, revealing a host of technological and styling updates for a long-running model that had grown long in the tooth.

The changes coming for the 2018 model year put the Equinox as a proper compact SUV, as the slimmed-down model sheds significant weight and adopts a trio of turbocharged four-cylinders. Going out on a limb in the red-hot market segment, Chevrolet plans to offer a diesel.

Looking like a Malibu that morphed into an SUV, the next-generation Equinox adopts the design language of Chevy’s newest crop of small sedans. Forget about the yawnmobiles of yesteryear and get a load of these busy, flowing flanks, the model shouts.

Underneath the skin, the changes are equally dramatic — maybe even more so. Chevy engineers shaved 400 pounds from the Equinox, which now weighs 10 percent less than the previous model. With rear seats folded flat, GM lists interior cargo volume at 63.5 cubic feet.

Like its recently redesigned Malibu stablemate, the Equinox’s diet allows it to accept a four-cylinder-only engine lineup. Gone is GM’s ubiquitous 3.6-liter V6.

The entry-level mill is the turbocharged 1.5-liter four-cylinder found in the Malibu, making 170 horsepower and 184 lb-ft of torque. Chevy doesn’t list the transmission, but it’s almost certainly the brand’s trusty six-speed automatic.

GM’s new 9T50 nine-speed automatic comes standard on up-level models powered by a 252-hp turbocharged 2.0-liter four. While the automaker hasn’t announced torque figures for this mill (it’s a 2 hp bump over the 2.0-liter found in up-level Malibus), it does promise the same max trailering capacity as past V6 models (3,500 pounds).

There’s plenty of debate over the future of light-duty diesel engines in North America — mainly, is there a future? — but Chevy doesn’t seem worried about the oil-burning stigma spawned by Volkswagen’s emissions deception. The optional 1.6-liter turbo-diesel is the only engine of its type in the North American compact SUV market. Making 136 hp and 236 lb-ft, the mill adopts start/stop technology and allows the automaker to advertise a GM-estimated 40 miles per gallon on the highway.

Highway mileage for front-wheel-drive base models is estimated at 31 mpg, while the 2.0-liter front-wheel-drive variant is estimated at 28 mpg. All-wheel-drive models adopt a switchable system that decouples from the rear axle when four-wheel traction isn’t needed, a la Jeep Cherokee and Chrysler 200, further aiding fuel economy.

The 2018 Equinox goes on sale in the first quarter of 2017.

[Images: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 90 comments
  • Rudiger Rudiger on Sep 25, 2016

    There are a couple caveats that go along with the diesel. First, will it require urea additive to meet emissions. Not a big deal, but having to constantly buy and refill that stuff might be a pain to some. More critical is the price. As everyone knows, GM has a real bad habit of pricing wanted options in the stratosphere. No one buys them, they end up discontinuing the option, and then put big incentives on the hood to eventually unload them. This is also rather important considering how cheap gasoline happens to be right now. If the diesel Equinox is priced reasonably, it could do alright. Otherwise, just another failed GM product. I'm a little torn on that big side 'swoop'. Seems like the stylists were channeling the now discontinued Mazda5, which might not be such a hot idea since that wasn't exactly a big seller. And, hopefully, the new Equinox' rear seats will fold flat. The current one has a two-tier effect in the cargo area when the rear seats are folded.

    • Shaker Shaker on Sep 25, 2016

      "And, hopefully, the new Equinox’ rear seats will fold flat." They do - there's a one-minute video @ Chevy's website. Of course the big print gives the "40"/"31" highway numbers for the diesel/1.5l turbo. Yes, every SUV owner drives on the highway most of the time, and will not be disappointed by the 15MPG city that they'll get. Edit - Rants redacted :-(

  • Rudiger Rudiger on Sep 25, 2016
    "They do – there’s a one-minute video @ Chevy’s website." Were they the last? I remember when the hoary old Aveo was like the only small car that had non-flat-folding rear seats. Better late to the party than never, I suppose.
    • Shaker Shaker on Sep 26, 2016

      I guess that Chevy had to make up for not keeping the sliding rear seat somehow.

  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
  • 1995 SC No
  • Analoggrotto I hope the walls of Mary Barra's office are covered in crushed velvet.
Next