Michigan Doesn't Allow Tesla Sales, But Keeps Buying More Tesla Stock

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Michigan doesn’t want its residents to order a Tesla, but it sees no problem in owning $72 million in stock to bolster its state retirement fund.

According to The Detroit News, the Michigan Department of Treasury bought a further $48 million in Tesla shares in the second quarter of this year, boosting its stake to 339,623 shares — more than triple the amount it owned in March. Meanwhile, Michigan won’t budge on laws that prevent Tesla from selling vehicles in the state.

The State of Michigan Retirement Systems holds about $60 billion in funds to support the retirement pensions of state employees, as well as the police, judiciary, and education sectors. While the Tesla stock makes up just over one-tenth of one percent of the fund, it’s more than double the combined worth of its General Motors and Ford stock.

It’s an awkward position for the state. Michigan keeps Tesla out to protect the Detroit Three, but invests more in Tesla.

In 2014, Michigan passed a law banning the direct sale of automobiles. That means that Tesla, an automaker without a franchised dealer network, can’t court buyers in that state. Allowing it would mean unfair competition for automakers who operate a dealer network, lawmakers claim.

In a statement made to The Detroit News, the Treasury Department’s Bureau of Investments said, “The additional (Tesla) shares did not materially add to the risk of the overall $60 billion investment portfolio.”

Since the passage of the bill, Tesla has fought to persuade the state to allow sales of its vehicles. So far, applications for dealer and service facilities have been stymied by requests for more information.

Political and public sentiment seems to be working in Tesla’s favor, albeit slowly. A bill introduced by State Rep. Aaron Miller (R-Sturgis) seeks to overturn the ban on direct sales, while an interest group called the Michigan Freedom to Buy Coalition wants a legislative solution to Tesla’s plight. Other free-enterprise advocates support the automaker, but its opponents loom large.

The Michigan Automobile Dealers Association, which initiated the 2014 bill, continues to stand its ground. If other automakers can play by the rules, it states, so can Tesla.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 11 comments
  • FOG FOG on Aug 12, 2016

    That is terrible. It's be like a federal government ordering GM to make thousands of Volts and then buying Nissan Leaf's themselves. Oh, wait... I am pretty sure the current administration did exactly that.

  • Brn Brn on Aug 12, 2016

    The Executive Branch and the Legislative Branch don't agree on something???

  • FreedMike I'd say that question is up to the southern auto workers. If I were in their shoes, I probably wouldn't if the wages/benefits were at at some kind of parity with unionized shops. But let's be clear here: the only thing keeping those wages/benefits at par IS the threat of unionization.
  • 1995 SC So if they vote it down, the UAW gets to keep trying. Is there a means for a UAW factory to decide they no longer wish to be represented and vote the union out?
  • Lorenzo The Longshoreman/philosopher Eri Hoffer postulated "Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and ends up as a racket." That pretty much describes the progression of the United Auto Workers since World War II, so if THEY are the union, the answer is 'no'.
  • Redapple2 I think I ve been in 100 plants. ~ 20 in Mexico. ~10 Europe. Balance usa. About 1/2 nonunion. I supervised UAW skilled trades guys at GM Powertrain for 6 years. I know the answer.PS- you do know GM products - sales weighted - average about 40% USA-Canada Content.
  • Jrhurren Unions and ownership need to work towards the common good together. Shawn Fain is a clown who would love to drive the companies out of business (or offshored) just to claim victory.
Next