2017 Mazda3 Promises a Better Drive, as If That's What the 3 Needs and Consumers Want

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

Mazda sales representatives across the United States finally have the golden ticket for all of those eventual Honda Civic buyers who walked out the door before even test driving a Mazda3.

“When the driver maintains a constant steering angle, GVC immediately recovers engine drive torque, transferring load to the rear wheels to enhance vehicle stability,” Bill will tell his next up, quoting Mazda USA’s press release. Says Joe to the young couple expecting their first child: “The extremely subtle amount of deceleration force added by GVC normally amounts to 0.01 G or less.” Tom, with a patronizing over-the-glasses glance at the fixed-income senior citizens across the desk, says, “GVC demonstrates its effect consistently over a wide range of driving situations, regardless of the driver’s level of skill.”

GVC, or G-Vectoring Control, is the next step in Mazda’s Skyactiv-branded technology. G-Vectoring control debuts on the refreshed 2017 versions of the Mazda6, a chronically unpopular midsize sedan, and the increasingly uncommon Mazda3, sales of which have tumbled by nearly a fifth since the car’s 2012 peak.

To be sure, the 2017 Mazda3’s G-Vectoring Control will be yet another step forward for a car that is arguably the best-driving compact car on sale in America already. By claiming greater front-tire grip, quicker and more precise control, and enhanced vehicle responsiveness and stability, Mazda is doubling down on the 3’s areas of expertise despite a large degree of consumer rejection for a car which already excels in those very areas.

In search of success, Mazda doesn’t need the 3 to steer and handle better. But let there be no doubt, Mazda will try to sell you a 2017 Mazda3 which steers and handles better.

By emphasizing GVC, I didn’t expect Mazda to also deliver precisely what the 3 needs — a massive dose of refinement made apparent by sharp reductions in noise, vibration, and harshness — in a mid-cycle refresh.

Mazda nevertheless make claims on that front for the 2017 model, but Mazda doesn’t appear to have aimed high. “The 2017 Mazda3 is a substantial 3 dB quieter at 25 mph over rough roads, thanks to tighter body gaps and improved sound insulation,” Mazda says, citing internal studies.

Yes, if you’re going slow and the roads are rough, we have internal studies which suggest the new 3 will be quieter than the old 3, Mazda seems to be saying.

Mazda also notes improved ride comfort from a reduction in “jolt sensations.” Modest interior alterations — new steering wheel, electric parking brake, a better heads-up display — are unlikely to be noticed by the typical buyer who also won’t be able to spot changes to the 2017 Mazda3’s exterior.

But Mazda is most keen on pointing out the merits of G-Vectoring Control, a software control system which Car and Driver initially said, “just feels as if it makes the steering a little heftier.” After more driving, K.C. Colwell clearly came to recognize the benefits, but questioned how Mazda would manage to inform the typical compact car buyer. I would question whether a car that already features a measure of genuine performance credentials (which mainstream buyers are intent on avoiding) should initially reveal itself on a test drive with heftier steering.

From the standpoint of someone who believes the Mazda3 was the best small car on the market prior to the dawn of G-Vectoring Control — that’d be me — an improved Mazda3 will continue to stand tall as a car I can happily recommend to friends and family. But don’t expect the 2017 Mazda3’s G-Vectoring Control to dramatically alter sales results. Mazda is on track to sell fewer than 100,000 3s and fewer than 45,000 6s in America in 2016, down 8 percent and 25 percent, respectively, year-over-year. (Brand-wide Mazda volume is down 7 percent in 2016.)

G-Vectoring Control isn’t able to instantly change the U.S. Mazda dealer network, about which TTAC’s B&B so vociferously complains. It also won’t instantly flip Mazda’s dreadful 30-percent loyalty rate, just as recommended ratings from Consumer Reports don’t instantly alter the collective consumer’s beliefs regarding Mazda reliability.

G-Vectoring Control does, however, instantly become standard equipment on all 2017 Mazda3s and Mazda6s. Making Mazda USA viable on a larger scale will take time. “It will likely be early in the next decade before all the pieces come together from a product standpoint,” TheDrive reported in July after a conversation with Mazda’s North American CEO, Masahiro Moro.

[Images: Mazda]

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 117 comments
  • Otaku Otaku on Aug 11, 2016

    Maybe it would help if the stylists could make it not resemble a penis with wheels quite so much. Maybe not

    • Wolfinator Wolfinator on Aug 12, 2016

      I honestly have no idea what you are seeing. If your penis looks like that, you should probably consult a physician ASAP!

  • Lithe Lithe on Aug 13, 2016

    Interesting article to read from Australia. Over here, the 3, 6 and unfortunately CX-5 are strong contenders in their respective segments. Behind the Hyundai i30 and Corolla (mostly hatchback rather than sedan), but extremely common.

  • Dwford Ford's management change their plans like they change their underwear. Where were all the prototypes of the larger EVs that were supposed to come out next year? Or for the next gen EV truck? Nowhere to be seen. Now those vaporware models are on the back burner to pursue cheaper models. Yeah, ok.
  • Wjtinfwb My comment about "missing the mark" was directed at, of the mentioned cars, none created huge demand or excitement once they were introduced. All three had some cool aspects; Thunderbird was pretty good exterior, let down by the Lincoln LS dash and the fairly weak 3.9L V8 at launch. The Prowler was super cool and unique, only the little nerf bumpers spoiled the exterior and of course the V6 was a huge letdown. SSR had the beans, but in my opinion was spoiled by the tonneau cover over the bed. Remove the cover, finish the bed with some teak or walnut and I think it could have been more appealing. All three were targeting a very small market (expensive 2-seaters without a prestige badge) which probably contributed. The PT Cruiser succeeded in this space by being both more practical and cheap. Of the three, I'd still like to have a Thunderbird in my garage in a classic color like the silver/green metallic offered in the later years.
  • D Screw Tesla. There are millions of affordable EVs already in use and widely available. Commonly seen in Peachtree City, GA, and The Villages, FL, they are cheap, convenient, and fun. We just need more municipalities to accept them. If they'll allow AVs on the road, why not golf cars?
  • ChristianWimmer Best-looking current BMW in my opinion.
  • Analoggrotto Looks like a cheap Hyundai.
Next