2017 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1: Slightly Slower and Cheaper Than a Hellcat

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

General Motors just released pricing and performance figures for its 2017 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1, and unless Ford comes up with a hotter Mustang, it looks like Dodge still holds the domestic performance crown.

Billed as the most powerful production Camaro ever, the 650-horsepower ZL1 comes with an MSRP of $62,135 for coupe models, $69,135 for drop-tops. Lower-end models stand to benefit from Chevy’s 1LE performance package.

Paired with the optional 10-speed automatic transmission, the ZL1’s supercharged 6.2-liter V8 rockets the top-dog Camaro to 60 miles per hour in 3.5 seconds, and hits the quarter-mile in 11.4 seconds — about two-tenths of a second behind the Challenger Hellcat.

Acceleration figures for the Hellcat vary depending on who tests it, so despite overlap in 0-60 times, Dodge can still claim the fastest quarter-mile.

With stock tires and an non-prepped surface, GM says the ZL1’s lateral acceleration will hit 1.02 g while cornering. Obviously, this is a ride begging for the track.

If 62 grand (plus taxes and fees) is too steep, Chevy will add the 1LE package to your V6 or V8 Camaro for $4,500 and $6,500, respectively. Featuring many go-fast goodies, the V6 package also contains the FE3 suspension borrowed from the Camaro SS, while V8 customers gain the ZL1’s electronic limited-slip differential and FE4 suspension with Magnetic Ride dampers.

Zero-to-60 times for 1LE-equipped models are 5.2 seconds for the V6 and 4.2 seconds for the V8.

The ZL1 may be faster than anything Ford sells (barring the uber-rare GT), but the Mustang handily beats the Camaro in the all-important sales race. Chevy’s pony car struggled to find buyers this year, so we’ll wait and see if the ZL1 ignites a burning desire among performance car buyers.

While its performance figures muscle in on the Hellcat’s turf, the ZL1 undercuts the Dodge’s price by about $2,000.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 54 comments
  • Buickman I like it!
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
  • 1995 SC No
Next