Tiny Econoboxes Head to Big Sky Country for Tiny Festival

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

It’s like Woodstock, but for fans of 1990s econoboxes that make double-digit horsepower.

This weekend, the eighth annual “Westiva” gathering will take place in the rugged foothills of Kananaskis Country, Alberta, drawing proud Ford Festiva enthusiasts from far and wide. Heads up, Montana — if you’re a resident with a passion for slow acceleration and spartan interiors, there’s a group of friends waiting north of the border.

Alberta: big sky country. Oil country. Ranchers and roads populated with Super Duty/Heavy Duty crew cab 4x4s. I once rented a Mazda 2 there, and it was a thoroughly emasculating experience. The little Mazda, of course, could at least get out of its own way.

Westiva attendees don’t care about horsepower. The only time these subcompact hatchback aficionados leave rubber on the road is after they blow a tire on Highway 2. And they’re fine with that.

Organizer Ian Cassley likes his Festiva for its simplicity and mileage. According to Metro Calgary, he drove his first Festiva to 400,000 kilometers (249,000 miles) before trading it in for a fresher model. A body kit and turbocharged four-cylinder borrowed from a 1988 Mazda 323 makes Cassley’s Festiva hard to miss in a parking lot — unless it’s parked behind anything larger than a Fiat 500.

The festival is small but growing, and attracts drivers from as far away as Vancouver, Wyoming and Ontario. Cassley wanted to make the event more inclusive, so he opened it up to other vehicles of the same class.

“It’s not just for Festivas – I’ve put out invites on Geo Metro and Suzuki Swift forums – any kind of econo-box car from the late 80s early 90s,” he told Metro Calgary.

If you go, you’ll likely meet Ryan Prins, whose stock ’93 Festiva has 450,000 km on the odometer (280,000 miles). When the publication asked what kept the Festiva fires burning, he replied, “These cars are very, very easy to work on – I can probably fix almost anything on the side of the road. They have very little electronics.”

Anyone who has ever enjoyed Festiva ownership will likely agree — there’s very few things to break.

[Image: Baileyusa115/ Flickr]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 55 comments
  • Lithiumbomb Lithiumbomb on Jul 18, 2016

    I had an '88 Festiva as my second college car. For the money, it was hands down the best car I've ever had. It was a base model with only a 4 speed. I got 33mpg city, highway, didn't matter. 33mpg. There was plenty of room on the inside (at the expense of anything safety related), it was easy to work on, and cheap to repair. It did get a little wobbly at 85mph I eventually rear ended someone with it and sold it to some teenager, who then totalled it properly.

    • VaderSS VaderSS on Jul 18, 2016

      ""For the money, it was hands down the best car I’ve ever had."" Same here.

  • IanCassley IanCassley on Jul 26, 2016

    I've just uploaded a new post on my blog with a bunch of photos from Westiva 2016. In spite of the damp and cool weather we still had a good turnout. http://www.econoboxcafe.com/2016/07/westiva-2016-photos.html Hope you enjoy them.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next