On Autopilot, Elon Musk Has a Friend in NHTSA Chief

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

His company’s product is under investigation by the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, but Tesla CEO Elon Musk likes the favorable press the NHTSA gave to its Autopilot system.

Musk tweeted a link to a Wall Street Journal report that quotes NHTSA administrator Mark Rosekind praising the semi-autonomous driving system at a Detroit conference last week. The NHTSA is investigating what role Autopilot played in a fatal Florida crash on May 7.

In his speech, Rosekind said the automotive industry “cannot wait for perfect” when it comes to developing self-driving technology. The Autopilot-equipped Model S involved in the Florida crash didn’t recognize a tractor trailer crossing the highway, a fact (admitted by Tesla) that sparked a backlash against the system. Critics also slammed the company’s “beta testing” of an imperfect technology.

“We should be desperate for anything we can find to save people’s lives,” said Rosekind.

The administrator’s comments echo Musk’s feelings about road safety. Musk stands by the technology, insisting that it saves lives and will continue to improve. Despite calls to scrap Autopilot until it can be proven fail-safe, Musk has no plans to abandon the feature. Instead, he plans to help educate drivers on how to operate the system safely.

Road deaths shot up 7.7 percent last year in the U.S., and the NHTSA’s mandate is to reduce them. Low gas prices (and more miles driven) are to blame for the spike in fatalities. In March, Rosekind gave the NHTSA six months to develop a basic set of rules for autonomous vehicles.

Tesla’s Autopilot is also being investigated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the National Transportation Safety Board.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • Old Man Pants Old Man Pants on Jul 25, 2016

    Crap, the Teslites got to Rosekind. He's going to have to start his staff's jacket lapels over backwards to make sure there are no hidden party pins.

  • TrailerTrash TrailerTrash on Jul 25, 2016

    "Rosekind said the automotive industry “cannot wait for perfect” " THIS is what makes me keep kicking my cat! Another strawman argument! Is this not the equivalent of the DNC working for another anointed greenie Obama loved one? Is this not the NHTSA only without Wasserman? Grease the wheel for the EV Musk. Hell... NOBODY wants to wait for perfect. Everybody is for the best and now. We JUST want to not be manipulated with false advertising. Autopilot is nothing more than a background safety system that perhaps is farther ahead of others. And even this might be braggadocio. I dunno enough about all the systems now in use. . Perhaps others systems are just as good and work well in the background and are not used as misleading sales aids. As long as you need to keep your friggin hands on the wheel and basically drive and ready to take complete control in nano seconds...it is NOT autopilot! And the driver needs to be driving.

  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could be made in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well.
  • Groza George I don’t care about GM’s anything. They have not had anything of interest or of reasonable quality in a generation and now solely stay on business to provide UAW retirement while they slowly move production to Mexico.
  • Arthur Dailey We have a lease coming due in October and no intention of buying the vehicle when the lease is up.Trying to decide on a replacement vehicle our preferences are the Maverick, Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5 or CX-30.Unfortunately both the Maverick and Subaru are thin on the ground. Would prefer a Maverick with the hybrid, but the wife has 2 'must haves' those being heated seats and blind spot monitoring. That requires a factory order on the Maverick bringing Canadian price in the mid $40k range, and a delivery time of TBD. For the Subaru it looks like we would have to go up 2 trim levels to get those and that also puts it into the mid $40k range.Therefore are contemplating take another 2 or 3 year lease. Hoping that vehicle supply and prices stabilize and purchasing a hybrid or electric when that lease expires. By then we will both be retired, so that vehicle could be a 'forever car'. And an increased 'carbon tax' just kicked in this week in most of Canada. Prices are currently $1.72 per litre. Which according to my rough calculations is approximately $5.00 per gallon in US currency.Any recommendations would be welcomed.
  • Eric Wait! They're moving? Mexico??!!
  • GrumpyOldMan All modern road vehicles have tachometers in RPM X 1000. I've often wondered if that is a nanny-state regulation to prevent drivers from confusing it with the speedometer. If so, the Ford retro gauges would appear to be illegal.
Next