Bark's Bites: Dealers Are the Worst Businessmen, Part Two

Mark "Bark M." Baruth
by Mark "Bark M." Baruth
I’m back like a rebel making trouble with another installment of Dealers Are The Worst Businessmen. Today, we’ll be talking about the information that most dealers use to make every decision in the dealership, and how it’s completely and utterly useless.To those of you who’ve worked in the dealership world, you already know what I’m talking about, right? Yep. The CRM (Customer Relationship Management) tool. Doesn’t matter whether it’s VinSolutions, DealerSocket, or any of the other popular software solutions on the market. Nowhere will you find a more prominent example of “garbage in, garbage out” than in the customer data mining that occurs at every dealer group. It’s a wonderful example of how most dealers spend thousands of dollars on tools they believe they need and then neglect to learn how to properly use.But first, a story.Nearly 18 long months ago, I walked into a Ford store in central Kentucky to lease my Fiesta ST. As I mentioned in my original write-up, I spoke with the Internet Sales Manager for a couple of weeks about my decision, and even submitted a lead through Autotrader’s Trade-In Marketplace tool. But when it came time for my salesperson to enter my information into their CRM tool, I watched him as he selected “Referral” from the drop down window.“Excuse me, sir,” I said, having a near heart attack (as I worked for Autotrader at the time), “but I am not a referral. I submitted a lead through Trade-In Marketplace.”“Yeah,” said the older gentleman, without turning his face to me, “but I get paid less on the deal if the Internet Department is involved.”Oof.You see, my friends, there’s a struggle at every dealership. It’s called “attribution.” Every car dealer in America wants to know where each and every sale originates. Even though it’s a statistical fact that nearly ninety percent of today’s shoppers start their searches for their dream cars online, car dealers refuse to accept it. In fact, if I were to walk into any dealer’s office across the country and ask him where most of his sales come from, I’ll get these answers, and in this order:
  1. Referrals
  2. Walk-up/Drive-by
  3. Dealer’s Website
I’ll address these one at a time, starting with referrals.Bitch, please.We all know that these hoes ain’t loyal. The referral is as dead as Jacob Marley. Today’s car shopper is more price conscious than ever, and they don’t care that you sold Aunt Margie a Ford LTD in 1986. They’re going to go where they can get the best deal, and they’re likely willing to drive up to 100 miles to do it — so stop it with the referral stuff. It isn’t true, and you know it — which is why you complain constantly about third-party sites being a “race to the bottom.” Your pride is just hurting because you can’t admit that your “Family owned since 1953” bullshit doesn’t matter one bit to anyone.Secondly, you want me to believe that the BMW 528i that you had parked behind the building of your Ford store was sold to a “walk-up?” Again, please stop. The only reason that your salespeople mark “walk-up” on the sourcing sheet is because they don’t want to share the credit with the Business Development Center/Internet Sales department. And they damn sure don’t want to give up their best “up” of the day because the customer might have already called and spoken to another salesman. “Walk-up” it is.Lastly, if your website isn’t the number one driver of traffic to your business, you have bigger problems than either of us can fix, Mr. Dealer. In fact, it’s probably a CDK or CarsForSale template that looks no different from any one of a million dealer websites. There’s no differentiation, period. But you’re super proud of it. I get it. So you want to give that “last click” credit to your website. Of course, you rarely spend much time considering how they found your website, because you’re convinced that $8,000 a month you spend on Search Engine Marketing (which you don’t understand — like at all) is driving oodles of people to your site. Especially when they use search terms like “2011 Chevrolet Impala in Bremerton Washington” as one does.As a result, your CRM tool is filled with useless data. Of course, you also get automatically generated data from phone calls and emails from third-party sites, which is probably the number one way that you evaluate the effectiveness of these advertising outlets. There’s just one, teeny, tiny problem with that — nobody, and I mean nobody calls or emails dealers anymore. The most generous study out there is J.D. Power, who estimates that only 24 percent of shoppers contact dealers via email or social media. Most other studies place the number at around 10 percent. Customers have learned that emailing a dealer is a super way to get a thousand autoresponder emails in their inboxes on the daily.But wait: if 90 percent of shoppers use the Internet, but only 24 percent email the dealer, what are the rest of them doing? You got it. They just show up unannounced, at which point the lazy, slightly unethical salesman marks them as a referral or a walk-up. This leads to crazy behavior from dealers, like canceling all third-party advertisers — only to come crawling back a few months later, and at a higher rate. Oops. In my nearly five years in the business on the advertising side, I’ve never seen a dealer successfully walk away from third-party entirely. It might work out okay for a month or two, but eventually they all come crawling back.So what’s a dealer to do? Well, here’s what I’ve recommended in the past: Don’t have your salespeople ask where customers found the car. It’s a bad time in the sales process to do it; customers aren’t ready to be transparent yet. Wait until the deal is done and the paperwork is signed. Then, hand them a sheet with all the logos of the places you advertise — and even the logos of the places you don’t. Don’t ask where they found your car, ask them where they did their research. Instead of having to remember exactly where they found your car, they can simply remember all the sites they used in the shopping process. If you see a large number of customers circling a site you don’t use, consider adding it to your repertoire.Next, instead of figuring out which sources drive the most leads, they should figure out which advertising sources generate the most profit. Some sites drive a high volume of low-quality leads, while others drive a lower number of high-quality leads. Which one would you want as a dealer? A high number of emails and phone calls isn’t necessarily a good thing. It can lead to endless amounts of wasted time on deals that never materialize.Having a CRM tool is a good thing for a dealership, but the corrupted data in it can lead to bad advertising decisions. Learning how to manage the data entry and discovering what the data truly means would help your neighborhood store make better decisions across the board. But until they do that, they’ll be counting phone calls and emails and congratulating themselves on their high number of referrals.And now even you know that’s the wrong way to do it.[Image: r2hox/Flickr ( CC BY-SA 2.0)]
Mark "Bark M." Baruth
Mark "Bark M." Baruth

More by Mark "Bark M." Baruth

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 73 comments
  • Greytraveler Greytraveler on Jul 30, 2016

    I have purchased more cars than I can count over the last 60 years. When single, I found going to a dealer and negotiating for a car to be a form of entertainment. Back in the day, a salesperson could actually quote a price and close the deal. No "OK, now we see the guy who closes the deal". I don't have the time or energy to screw around with the current process when one walks into a dealer these days. I am strongly considering a broker for the next buy. Or the option of using something like True Car to find an acceptable car/price. I want the paperwork ready to sign when I walk in the door and the car ready to drive away. No more multiple hours screwing around with some jerk "closer". Cars, for me, are no longer something that give me a rush, like my new Pontiac 1968 GTO. Now they are just an appliance and need to be reliable and safe.

  • Jeff S Jeff S on Jul 31, 2016

    Next time I buy a new vehicle I am going to use COSCO. I would rather go to the dentist than deal directly with a stealership.

    • See 2 previous
    • JimC2 JimC2 on Jul 31, 2016

      @Scoutdude "F&I tru-coat, vin etching, extended warranty obstacle course" You left out the spray scotchguard on the seats and extra window tint obstacles.

  • KOKing I owned a Paul Bracq-penned BMW E24 some time ago, and I recently started considering getting Sacco's contemporary, the W124 coupe.
  • Bob The answer is partially that stupid manufacturers stopped producing desirable PHEVs.I bought my older kid a beautiful 2011 Volt, #584 off the assembly line and #000007 for HOV exemption in MD. We love the car. It was clearly an old guy's car, and his kids took away his license.It's a perfect car for a high school kid, really. 35 miles battery range gets her to high school, job, practice, and all her friend's houses with a trickle charge from the 120V outlet. In one year (~7k miles), I have put about 10 gallons of gas in her car, and most of that was for the required VA emissions check minimum engine runtime.But -- most importantly -- that gas tank will let her make the 300-mile trip to college in one shot so that when she is allowed to bring her car on campus, she will actually get there!I'm so impressed with the drivetrain that I have active price alerts for the Cadillac CT6 2.0e PHEV on about 12 different marketplaces to replace my BMW. Would I actually trade in my 3GT for a CT6? Well, it depends on what broke in German that week....
  • ToolGuy Different vehicle of mine: A truck. 'Example' driving pattern: 3/3/4 miles. 9/12/12/9 miles. 1/1/3/3 miles. 5/5 miles. Call that a 'typical' week. Would I ever replace the ICE powertrain in that truck? No, not now. Would I ever convert that truck to EV? Yes, very possibly. Would I ever convert it to a hybrid or PHEV? No, that would be goofy and pointless. 🙂
  • ChristianWimmer Took my ‘89 500SL R129 out for a spin in his honor (not a recent photo).Other great Mercedes’ designers were Friedrich Geiger, who styled the 1930s 500K/540K Roadsters and my favorite S-Class - the W116 - among others. Paul Bracq is also a legend.RIP, Bruno.
  • ToolGuy Currently my drives tend to be either extra short or fairly long. (We'll pick that vehicle over there and figure in the last month, 5 miles round trip 3 times a week, plus 1,000 miles round trip once.) The short trips are torture for the internal combustion powertrain, the long trips are (relative) torture for my wallet. There is no possible way that the math works to justify an 'upgrade' to a more efficient ICE, or an EV, or a hybrid, or a PHEV. Plus my long trips tend to include (very) out of the way places. One day the math will work and the range will work and the infrastructure will work (if the range works) and it will work in favor of a straight EV (purchased used). At that point the short trips won't be torture for the EV components and the long trips shouldn't hurt my wallet. What we will have at that point is the steady drip-drip-drip of long-term battery degradation. (I always pictured myself buying generic modular replacement cells at Harbor Freight or its future equivalent, but who knows if that will be possible). The other option that would almost possibly work math-wise would be to lease a new EV at some future point (but the payment would need to be really right). TL;DR: ICE now, EV later, Hybrid maybe, PHEV probably never.
Next