Autopilot is Here to Stay, Says Musk, as NHTSA Delves Deeper Into Fatal Crash

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Tesla CEO Elon Musk has no plans to remove the Autopilot feature from his vehicles, despite demands from safety and consumer groups.

Musk told the Wall Street Journal that lack of education is the problem, not the technology behind the semi-autonomous driving system. The executive’s comments come after the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration delivered a lengthy list of questions to Tesla as part of its investigation into the fatal May 7 crash of a Model S.

Autopilot is continually updated based on user feedback — a practice called “beta testing” that was criticized in this case, as the product is a system that can pilot a vehicle. The system could lead to overconfidence in its abilities, creating a dangerous situation for some drivers.

Musk told the WSJ that he wanted Autopilot in vehicles at an early point in its development, because “we knew we had a system that on balance would save lives.” In the wake of the May crash (which is partially blamed on the Autopilot failing to recognize and react to a transport truck) and a July 1 rollover, Musk plans to better educate owners.

A blog post on Tesla’s website will spell out how to properly operate Autopilot. “A lot of people don’t understand what it is and how you turn it on,” Musk told the WSJ.

As Musk talked Autopilot, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration did the same in a letter to Mathew Schwall, Tesla’s director of field performance engineering. The July 8 letter, acquired by the New York Times, throws a list of data-heavy demands at the automaker as the agency gets serious in its investigation.

Among other things, the NHTSA wants to know of all of the times Autopilot helped a driver avoid a collision via any of its automated functions (Autosteer, automatic emergency braking, and collision warning chime), as well as all of the complaints, suits and other actions by owners who claim Autopilot failed to stop one. It also wants to know of every modification or refinement made to the technology, and an explanation of how the system identified obstacles. Tesla will have to hand over its reconstruction of the fatal crash.

In short, the agency wants the entire operational history of the system in Tesla vehicles, and its development history, too. Depending on the request, the automaker has until July 29 or August 26 to hand over the data.

The national Transportation Safety Board is also investigating the May 7 crash.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
11 of 80 comments
  • Ihatejalops Ihatejalops on Jul 12, 2016

    Tesla Death Watch 1: The regulators cometh

    • See 8 previous
    • Pch101 Pch101 on Jul 13, 2016

      @JimZ A company that generates consistent losses will eventually run out of money.

  • Ryoku75 Ryoku75 on Jul 13, 2016

    "Lack of education", aka we're too stupid? Musk should have considered this when designing autopilot, yes we will misuse it and yes there will be deaths. I'm willing to bet that all Teslas have a "smart Autopilot" option that you can unlock for $9000.

  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
  • Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
  • MaintenanceCosts You expect everything on Amazon and eBay to be fake, but it's a shame to see fake stuff on Summit Racing. Glad they pulled it.
Next