Autopilot is Here to Stay, Says Musk, as NHTSA Delves Deeper Into Fatal Crash

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Tesla CEO Elon Musk has no plans to remove the Autopilot feature from his vehicles, despite demands from safety and consumer groups.

Musk told the Wall Street Journal that lack of education is the problem, not the technology behind the semi-autonomous driving system. The executive’s comments come after the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration delivered a lengthy list of questions to Tesla as part of its investigation into the fatal May 7 crash of a Model S.

Autopilot is continually updated based on user feedback — a practice called “beta testing” that was criticized in this case, as the product is a system that can pilot a vehicle. The system could lead to overconfidence in its abilities, creating a dangerous situation for some drivers.

Musk told the WSJ that he wanted Autopilot in vehicles at an early point in its development, because “we knew we had a system that on balance would save lives.” In the wake of the May crash (which is partially blamed on the Autopilot failing to recognize and react to a transport truck) and a July 1 rollover, Musk plans to better educate owners.

A blog post on Tesla’s website will spell out how to properly operate Autopilot. “A lot of people don’t understand what it is and how you turn it on,” Musk told the WSJ.

As Musk talked Autopilot, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration did the same in a letter to Mathew Schwall, Tesla’s director of field performance engineering. The July 8 letter, acquired by the New York Times, throws a list of data-heavy demands at the automaker as the agency gets serious in its investigation.

Among other things, the NHTSA wants to know of all of the times Autopilot helped a driver avoid a collision via any of its automated functions (Autosteer, automatic emergency braking, and collision warning chime), as well as all of the complaints, suits and other actions by owners who claim Autopilot failed to stop one. It also wants to know of every modification or refinement made to the technology, and an explanation of how the system identified obstacles. Tesla will have to hand over its reconstruction of the fatal crash.

In short, the agency wants the entire operational history of the system in Tesla vehicles, and its development history, too. Depending on the request, the automaker has until July 29 or August 26 to hand over the data.

The national Transportation Safety Board is also investigating the May 7 crash.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
11 of 80 comments
  • Ihatejalops Ihatejalops on Jul 12, 2016

    Tesla Death Watch 1: The regulators cometh

    • See 8 previous
    • Pch101 Pch101 on Jul 13, 2016

      @JimZ A company that generates consistent losses will eventually run out of money.

  • Ryoku75 Ryoku75 on Jul 13, 2016

    "Lack of education", aka we're too stupid? Musk should have considered this when designing autopilot, yes we will misuse it and yes there will be deaths. I'm willing to bet that all Teslas have a "smart Autopilot" option that you can unlock for $9000.

  • 28-Cars-Later One of the biggest reasons not to purchase an EV that I hear is...that they just all around suck for almost every use case imaginable.
  • Theflyersfan A cheaper EV is likely to have a smaller battery (think Mazda MX-30 and Mitsubishi iMEV), so that makes it less useful for some buyers. Personally, my charging can only take place at work or at a four-charger station at the end of my street in a public lot, so that's a crapshoot. If a cheaper EV was able to capture what it seems like a lot of buyers want - sub-40K, 300+ mile range, up to 80% charging in 20-30 minutes (tops) - then they can possibly be added to some lists. But then the issues of depreciation and resale value come into play if someone wants to keep the car for a while. But since this question is asking person by person, if I had room for a second car to be garaged (off of the street), I would consider an EV for a second car and keep my current one as a weekend toy. But I can't do a 50K+ EV as a primary car with my uncertain charging infrastructure by me, road trips, and as a second car, the higher insurance rates and county taxes. Not yet at least. A plug in hybrid however is perfect.
  • 28-Cars-Later Neither, but Honda lost the plot a while back in my view so Rav it would be.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Nope. Still not interested.
  • 28-Cars-Later I know someone who would snap this up for the right money, but Ontario and likely the ask would prohibit it.
Next