AAA Study Finds Drastic Differences In Gasoline Quality

Bozi Tatarevic
by Bozi Tatarevic
aaa study finds drastic differences in gasoline quality

AAA hired an independent lab to complete 4,000 miles of simulated driving to compare Top Tier gasoline with the cheaper blends. Their findings show that the additive packages in Top Tier gas resulted in fewer carbon deposits than those found in the non-Top Tier gasoline test.

The study also found that there were some secondary benefits to the better additive packages, including slightly better fuel economy and better drivability. The benefits are apparent, but do consumers really care?

The Top Tier gasoline specification was created by a group of automakers in 2004 in response to the minimum gasoline detergent standard introduced by the EPA in 1995. The EPA standard was designed to meet emissions targets but didn’t account for engine longevity. So, automakers created a new higher standard to prevent long-term issues such as clogged fuel injectors and contaminated combustion chambers.

Top Tier gasoline is widely available and can even be found at wholesale retailer Costco. Most gasoline comes from similar sources and is transported along the same pipelines until it reaches a local distributor. The distributor sells the gas to local stations and blends in an additive package based on the brand and specification. Some gasoline gets a very basic additive package but Top Tier gas gets a very specific package that has been tested to meet the Top Tier standards.

According to the AAA study, the non-Top Tier fuel caused carbon deposits that were 19 times higher than the deposits from the Top Tier fuel. They also saw better drivability and better fuel economy when the better fuel was used. Emissions were also reduced, likely due to the ban of metallic additives in Top Tier fuel.

The laboratory completed the test on a Ford port injected 2.3-liter engine, which appears to be the Lima engine from the late 1980s. This engine has been used for testing for about 15 years and is a popular one, due to the orientation of the valves (which shows the difference in carbon deposits in just 100 hours of testing). The full report shows compares the average 34.1 milligram carbon deposit in the Top Tier fuel test to the average 660.6 mg carbon deposit in the non-Top Tier fuel test.

The technical results are clear but the second part of the study looks at whether they really matter to consumers. The AAA survey found that 63 percent of drivers who responded believe that quality of gasoline differs between retailers, but only 12 percent use the additive package as a deciding point when making a purchase. The two main things that actually drive purchase decision are the location of the gas station and the price of fuel, with almost three quarters of respondents saying those factors motivated them the most.

Although the study makes it seem like your engine is doomed if you use lower-level fuels, there is an upside. Switching to a Top Tier gasoline has shown reductions in carbon deposits on an engine previously run on lower level gasoline, and the cost difference to switch is only a few cents per gallon. It may be worth it to make the jump.

[Images: AAA]

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 102 comments
  • Alfie Alfie on Jul 09, 2016

    Curious as to who paid for this 'survey'.

  • Mchan1 Mchan1 on Jul 11, 2016

    Funny how Gulf and Sunoco aren't Top Tier but either's gas is good. Costco's gas may be Top Tier but may 2014 car's engine drives more noisily every time after fill up while fuel efficiency was adequate. Switching out the gas on the next fill-up like Gulf/Sunoco/whatever brand made my car's engine more quiet, perform more smoothly and fuel efficiency increased! Explains why I don't frequent Costco's gas station much anymore even for the few cents/gallon savings. Guess it depends on what additives are added into the gasoline by each manufacturer. But that doesn't always justify the higher price. In my area (New England), Mobil has ALWAYS cost more like ~$.25/gallon MORE than other [leading] brands of gasoline. What a rip-off!

  • Jeff S I ignore the commercials. Never owned a Mazda but I would definitely look at one and seriously consider it. I would take a Honda, Toyota, or Mazda over any German vehicle at least they are long lasting, reliable, and don't cost an arm and a leg to maintain.
  • GregLocock The predictable hysteria and repetition of talking points in the meeja is quite funny. it does not divide Oxford into six zones. it restricts access at 6 locations , one on each road, to reduce congestion in the town centre. Florence, which faces the same issue, traffic and narrow historic streets, lined with historic buildings, simply closed the entire town centre off. Don't see anybody whining about that.
  • Jeff S I have rented from Hertz before and never encountered this but if I had I would sue them. Would not want a gun pointed at me and thrown in jail for renting a car.
  • Arthur Dailey I did use a service pre COVID to get the pricing that the dealers were alleged to have paid the manufacturer. It also provided 'quotes' from multiple dealers .
  • Arthur Dailey Has anyone else concluded that we may have a new 'troll' on this site?
Next