Passengers Aren't Getting the Same Protection as Drivers; IIHS Threatens Another Crash Category

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

After reports surfaced last year of automakers only adding driver’s side small-overlap crash protection to their vehicles, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety put the claims to the test.

A study of seven compact crossovers showed vast differences in safety between the driver and passenger side of the vehicle during small-overlap crashes, Automotive News reports, prompting the IIHS to consider adding another category to its testing criteria.

The small-overlap test was (and still is) a problem for automakers, sinking many vehicles’ ratings after IIHS added it in 2012. The Dodge Challenger was a recent victim of the test, which simulates a partial head-on collision with a vehicle or an impact with a utility pole.

Automakers quickly added reinforcements to their vehicles, but often only on the driver’s side.

In its study, the IIHS tested the current generation Toyota RAV4, Subaru Forester, Nissan Rogue, Hyundai Tucson, Mazda CX-5, Honda CR-V and Buick Encore. Every model received a “good” rating for the driver’s side, but only the Tucson scored the same rating for the passenger side. (The Tucson’s passenger-side footwell load path cropped up in TTAC’s review of the redesigned model.)

It was night and day with the RAV4, which scored a “poor” in the passenger-side test, while the Forester and Rogue scored “marginal.” During the tests, the RAV4 and Rogue recorded the largest amount of passenger footwell intrusion — 13 inches for the RAV4 and 10 inches for the Rogue.

According to the IIHS report: “The Rogue’s door hinge pillar was torn off completely, and the RAV4’s door opened. In a real crash, an open door would leave the occupant at risk for ejection.”

The remaining crossovers returned an “acceptable” rating.

“It’s not surprising that automakers would focus their initial efforts to improve small overlap protection on the side of the vehicle that we conduct the tests on,” stated David Zuby, IIHS executive vice president and chief research officer, in the report. “In fact, we encouraged them to do that in the short term if it meant they could quickly make driver-side improvements to more vehicles. As time goes by, though, we would hope they ensure similar levels of protection on both sides.”

A threat to add passenger-side small-overlap testing to its Top Safety Pick criteria would probably be enough to get automakers scrambling once again, eager to avoid a bad rating.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
8 of 49 comments
  • CanadaCraig You can just imagine how quickly the tires are going to wear out on a 5,800 lbs AWD 2024 Dodge Charger.
  • Luke42 I tried FSD for a month in December 2022 on my Model Y and wasn’t impressed.The building-blocks were amazing but sum of the all of those amazing parts was about as useful as Honda Sensing in terms of reducing the driver’s workload.I have a list of fixes I need to see in Autopilot before I blow another $200 renting FSD. But I will try it for free for a month.I would love it if FSD v12 lived up to the hype and my mind were changed. But I have no reason to believe I might be wrong at this point, based on the reviews I’ve read so far. [shrug]. I’m sure I’ll have more to say about it once I get to test it.
  • FormerFF We bought three new and one used car last year, so we won't be visiting any showrooms this year unless a meteor hits one of them. Sorry to hear that Mini has terminated the manual transmission, a Mini could be a fun car to drive with a stick.It appears that 2025 is going to see a significant decrease in the number of models that can be had with a stick. The used car we bought is a Mk 7 GTI with a six speed manual, and my younger daughter and I are enjoying it quite a lot. We'll be hanging on to it for many years.
  • Oberkanone Where is the value here? Magna is assembling the vehicles. The IP is not novel. Just buy the IP at bankruptcy stage for next to nothing.
  • Jalop1991 what, no Turbo trim?
Next