Now That There's A New Honda Civic, Why Are Sales Of The Old Acura ILX Rising?

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

There is a new Honda Civic on a new platform with a very well-equipped Touring trim available. The tenth-generation is a hot seller and it claimed top sales honours among passenger cars in April.

Yet sales of another car, based on the old Honda Civic’s platform, are on the rise. Indeed, sales of the Acura ILX, admittedly updated for 2016 but very much a close relative of the ninth-generation Civic, have risen nine percent in a car market which tumbled eight percent through the first five months of 2016.

Why?

No seriously, why?

Despite Honda conditions that suggest ILX sales should be falling, we’ve got a few theories about why ILX sales are on the rise.

HORSEPOWER?


The 2016 Honda Civic’s 1.5-liter turbocharged engine, hooked up to a continuously variable transmission that really isn’t so bad, is essentially just as quick as the 2.4-liter-powered Acura ILX with its eight-speed dual-clutch gearbox, but the official specs may lead you to believe otherwise.

The ILX’s 2.4 produces 201 horsepower; the Civic’s 1.5T only 174. Perhaps buyers believe the extra 27 horsepower will be evident, but because the Civic’s 1.5T makes all of its torque so low in the rev-range, the Civic is just as punchy in the real world, if not more so.

HONDA MONEY?


Second: is the potential buyer of a $28,930 compact Acura going to look at a $27,335 compact Honda, even if the Civic Touring features adaptive cruise, forward collision warning, lane departure warning, collision mitigation braking, road departure mitigation, 20-percent more cargo volume, 6-percent more passenger volume, and 3.4 inches of additional rear legroom?

Mainstream compact car pricing reaches into some uncomfortable regions. Regardless of how well-equipped and spacious that Civic Touring may be, for some potential ILX buyers who could (and should) be looking at an alternative Honda product, $27,335 will seem like too much for a non-performance Civic.

PRESTIGE?


After spending a week in a ninth-generation Civic Coupe, another week in the 2016 Acura ILX, a week in a 2016 Honda Civic 1.5T Touring sedan and a final week in its two-door equivalent, it’s beyond certain that the tenth-generation Civic is a far more modern piece of kit than the ninth-gen-Civic-based Acura ILX.

The Civic’s structure is more solid, enabling superior ride and handling balance. The cabin is significantly roomier. The tech interface is better. The steering is sharper. The brakes are better. A $27,335 Honda Civic 1.5T Touring feels like what a $30,000 Acura ILX should feel like, while a $28,930 Acura ILX would line up better against a $24,000 Honda Civic.

And in this environment, with the Honda Civic improved to the extent that demand for the Acura ILX should dry up, sales of the ILX are on the rise. Could it be down to reason number three, the flip side of reason number two, that we’re not giving enough credit to Honda’s upmarket brand for the cachet of the Acura badge?

Is the Acura ILX, dare we say it, desirable? Does it make people jealous?

One thing is certain: it’s still not popular. Acura is on track to sell 20,000 ILXs in the United States in 2016, the ILX’s best total since 2013. Yet Buick is killing off the Verano, a car which has typically sold twice as often as the Acura. Pricier entry-level luxury cars at Audi and Mercedes-Benz, meanwhile, are significantly more common than the ILX, though U.S. sales of the Audi A3 and Mercedes-Benz CLA are both declining in early 2016.

[Image Source: American Honda]

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 95 comments
  • Dal20402 Dal20402 on Jun 10, 2016

    It's based on the old platform, but it was substantially improved for 2016, and at real-world prices the 2016 improvements made it a decent value. Excellent powertrain, pretty good dynamics by FWD standards, good equipment levels, passable interior. Certainly a far better car than the Mercedes CLA being offered at a slightly higher price point.

  • 05lgt 05lgt on Jun 10, 2016

    Hi Tim, it's a puzzler for sure. I'm with a few of the previous comments on looks, but ... maybe the ATP tells a tale? MSRP to MSRP comparisons are always silly, do you have data on what both go for in real sale and lease deals?

  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
  • Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
  • MaintenanceCosts You expect everything on Amazon and eBay to be fake, but it's a shame to see fake stuff on Summit Racing. Glad they pulled it.
Next