General Motors Sued Over Previous-Generation Cruze Diesels

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

A Seattle law firm famous for going after automakers (and lately, diesel-producing automakers) has another target in its sights: General Motors.

According to The Detroit News, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro filed a class-action lawsuit in California yesterday, accusing GM and Chevrolet of misleading buyers of Chevy Cruze models equipped with the 2.0-liter diesel engine.

Much like in its two suits against Daimler, parent company of Mercedes-Benz, the firm accuses GM of using software to cheat on emissions tests, citing high emissions recorded during real-world testing. The six plaintiffs behind the suit want a vehicle buyback, reimbursement for the premium they paid over a regular Cruze, and punitive damages.

Chevrolet briefly offered a diesel version of the 2014 and 2015 model year Cruze, but uptake wasn’t high. The automaker pulled the plug as the second-generation Cruze loomed, and a spokesperson said they hadn’t sold one since May 2015.

The evidence behind the suit, at first glance, seems questionable. The law firm says its clients measured their own tailpipe emissions using portable equipment, which showed the Cruze diesel exceeded acceptable emissions levels at certain times.

In response to the firm’s earlier lawsuits, Mercedes-Benz said the effectiveness of its AdBlue urea-injection systems diminishes in cold weather to prevent condensation in the exhaust system. Since the Volkswagen diesel emissions scandal, other automakers accused of polluting have pointed to the challenge of keeping a diesel engine running clean under all conditions. TTAC once took a close look at how the technology on the Cruze diesel stacks up against a recalled Volkswagen TDI.

Responding to the lawsuit, GM stated, “These claims are baseless and we will vigorously defend ourselves. GM believes the Chevrolet Cruze turbo diesel complies with all U.S. EPA and CARB emissions regulations.”

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 26 comments
  • CincyDavid CincyDavid on Jun 23, 2016

    I have seen a grand total one ONE Cruze diesel in the wild. As much as GM frustrates me, I absolutely detest these money-grubbing bottom feeder shysters extorting money with nuisance suits. Attorneys are slimy enough, these guys are right up there with the personal injury guys who advertise on billboards.

    • See 1 previous
    • PrincipalDan PrincipalDan on Jun 24, 2016

      @redapple Every time TORT reform has come up it gets killed very quickly in congress. But then again we do keep electing lawyers to political office, so what do you expect?

  • Jdowmiller Jdowmiller on Jun 24, 2016

    Photographed on the Korean Veterans Blvd bridge downtown Nashville. Was this car made at the GM plant in Spring Hill? I've never seen one of these in the wild.

  • Ltcmgm78 Imagine the feeling of fulfillment he must have when he looks upon all the improvements to the Corvette over time!
  • ToolGuy "The car is the eye in my head and I have never spared money on it, no less, it is not new and is over 30 years old."• Translation please?(Theories: written by AI; written by an engineer lol)
  • Ltcmgm78 It depends on whether or not the union is a help or a hindrance to the manufacturer and workers. A union isn't needed if the manufacturer takes care of its workers.
  • Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
Next