Adventures in Recalls: FCA's Shifter 'Visor Tips Card'

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

As a six-and-a-half-foot tall red-blooded male who’s driven in demolition derbies and owns John Deere machinery, I naturally gravitated to a big, rear-wheel drive, future Junkyard Find sedan when it came time to replace our family car four years ago. Settling on a Pentastar-powered 2012 Dodge Charger, one non-negotiable item was FCA’s 8.4-inch uConnect screen. The other was ZF’s eight-speed automatic.

As we know, hapless drivers have failed to put their ZF-equipped cars in Park, confused by the spring-loaded shifter’s design, which always returns it to a central position no matter what gear those drivers select. The NHTSA started an investigation and FCA voluntarily recalled over a million 2014-2015 Grand Cherokees and 2012-2014 Chargers/300s.

I got my recall notice in the mail yesterday, which provided me with two things: a “Visor Tips Card” and a good belly laugh.

Remember the Ford ‘ park-to-reverse’ mess of the early 1980s? In that case, a design defect reared its ugly head in the transmissions of just about every Ford built between the mid-1960s and 1980. A worn detent between Park and Reverse caused vehicles to slip out of gear and roll away. Faced with financial annihilation through the potential recall and repair of 23 million vehicles, Ford deployed intense legal wrangling, resulting in a pseudo-recall wherein Ford agreed to mail warning labels to all owners of these transmissions instead of actually fixing them.

Rather than a peel-n-stick label, FCA issued me a Visor Tips Card, approximately the size of an iPad Mini, festooned with graphics of my shifter and emblazoned with admonitions to ALWAYS VERIFY YOUR VEHICLE IS IN PARK and to APPLY THE PARKING BRAKE. The latter exhortation caused me to chuckle as FCA chose to deploy a pump-and-dump release for the foot operated e-brake in the 2012 Charger and not a pull-to-release handle. Some underling deep within the bowels of Auburn Hills had the unenviable task of describing how to use it in terms concise enough to fit on a Visor Tips Card.

Try to describe the process of disengaging a push-to-release e-brake to someone who is totally uninterested in cars and driving in general. Go ahead, give it a shot.

“Um, push down on that lever with your foot.”

“But you just said that’s how I engage the brake.”

“Yes. Now you need to push it harder to make it stop working.”

“That makes no sense.”

“Trust me.”

*car rolls into a school bus filled with disabled children*

If certain drivers can’t figure out how to put the bloody thing in Park, they certainly won’t be able to comprehend the legally approved description of how to disengage a pump-action parking brake. I’m sure members of the B&B can disengage such a parking brake in their sleep, but the chance of confusion is absolutely real in a world filled with oblivious drivers who, directed by their navigation systems, routinely drive into the sea.

Unlike Ford’s debacle, there is no mechanical problem with my Charger. FCA’s transmission is working exactly as designed. What FCA didn’t count on was bewildered mooks who would fail to see the illuminated capital P on top of the shifter and on the freakin’ dashboard right in front of them. Perhaps a big red STOP button, as seen inside some test mules in spy shots, would suffice.

Not many Ford owners back in the ‘80s actually slapped the goofy pseudo-recall stickers onto their dashboards, which makes FCA’s suggestion to place this Visor Tips Card “ideally, on your visor” all the more amusing. Rumour has it that if the Card ends up in my glovebox, Sergio himself will pay me a visit, affix the Card to my sun visor with pop rivets, then force me to launder several of his black sweaters.

The accompanying letter informed me FCA will contact me again with a follow-up recall notice when an actual remedy is available, which it suggests will be sometime in Q4 of this year. My money’s on some sort of software upgrade that’ll loudly warn of impending doom if I open the driver’s door without the car being in Park. I highly doubt they’re going to retrofit all these vehicles with the redesigned ZF shifter that started appearing in FCA products last year. Wager on an electronic parking brake appearing in the next Charger/300 refresh, whenever that happens.

At least I’ll get a set of wheel chocks out of the other recall.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 125 comments
  • Moparmann Moparmann on Jun 08, 2016

    "A manual transmission. This is the weapon of a Jedi Knight. Not as clumsy or random as a torque converter; an elegant weapon for a more civilized age." :-)

  • Maserchist Maserchist on Jun 14, 2016

    Pro drivers, stunt drivers, regular drivers, colonically challenged drivers, real drivers, fake drivers; It just may take the REAL Mythbusters to actually get to the bottom of this well of hell.

  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
  • Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
  • MaintenanceCosts You expect everything on Amazon and eBay to be fake, but it's a shame to see fake stuff on Summit Racing. Glad they pulled it.
Next