Your Investigation Isn't Good Enough, Investors Tell Volkswagen

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Do investors trust Volkswagen to investigate itself and lay the appropriate blame? Not these three groups.

With the financial damage of the diesel emissions scandal now clear, three large investor groups are calling for accountability and the launch of an independent investigation, Reuters reports.

After the diesel hit the fan, Volkswagen set up a committee to investigate the scandal and hired law firm Jones Day to look into the issue and craft a report. That report comes out later this year.

Nice, but not good enough, say the groups, who worry the investigations won’t dig deep enough or be as accountable as some would like.

Made up of German investor group DSW, Belgian firm Deminor (which manages New York City’s pension fund) and UK-based Hermes EOS, the players want Volkswagen shareholders to be able to vote on a new inquiry at the automaker’s June 22 annual general meeting.

“When you have an independent investigation you can be sure that the findings will be publicized,” DSW spokesman Juergen Kurz told Reuters. “With internal investigations you do not know whether everything has been made transparent.”

Deminor called out the automaker’s scandal committee for only looking for “serious and manifest breaches,” which means the probe would overlook lesser transgressions among management.

Hermes is of the same mind, stating that the firm worries about the “potential liability of the members of the management and supervisory boards.”

Earlier this month, Volkswagen’s supervisory board essentially cleared management of wrongdoing in the scandal in preparation for the June AGM.

Despite the ongoing investigation by Jones Day, nothing serious cropped up in their findings, the board claimed. They’re recommending that shareholders ratify management’s 2015 decisions, an action required by German law.

Representatives from Hermes, Deminor and DSW might have something to say about that.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 9 comments
  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on May 24, 2016

    "With the financial damage of the diesel emissions scandal now clear..." No, it isn't clear yet. There is a host of lawsuits, government fines, and repairs/buyouts yet to be settled. Only a fraction of these are contained at this point.

  • 05lgt 05lgt on May 24, 2016

    Since comments on the Mini advertorial are shut down, I'll drop this here and apologize later: The Treacle About Cars.

  • ToolGuy "The car is the eye in my head and I have never spared money on it, no less, it is not new and is over 30 years old."• Translation please?(Theories: written by AI; written by an engineer lol)
  • Ltcmgm78 It depends on whether or not the union is a help or a hindrance to the manufacturer and workers. A union isn't needed if the manufacturer takes care of its workers.
  • Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
Next