Piston Slap: The Panther's 20 MPG Fuel-Economy Barrier?

Sajeev Mehta
by Sajeev Mehta

TTAC commentator VolandoBajo writes:

Sajeev, my worthy and esteemed fellow Panther defender,

I acquired my ’97 Mercury Grand Marquis LS about six months ago and have enjoyed everything about it. I’m hoping to find a good source for a dual exhaust that doesn’t cost more than the book value of the car, and to convince my wife that the mileage increase will pay for the mod over time.

But my present problem is baseline fuel economy. I see repeated references to a 20 miles per gallon highway figure, but I can only manage 17 mpg at the best of times.

I’ve driven just a limited number of highway runs, but even under controlled conditions, I have gotten at best 17 mpg or so. Around town, whether I punch it at lights, or drive it like the old man who I am not (on the inside), I cannot get more than a hair above 14 mpg.

The car had accumulated 185,000 miles when I acquired it from its original owners (the best provenance for any older car, I’m sure you’ll agree), and I am going on 196,000 miles now. I try not to make really short hops, and don’t run in dusty environments.

I’m hoping that you might suggest some routine maintenance items I should consider, especially ones I can do in my driveway, that might net me better mileage. I have considered things like a new EGR valve, but not sure where to start or what’s worth the effort.

Thanks in advance. You and Jack are the twin bright spots of TTAC. I enjoy a lot of the rest and many of the B&B, but it is you and Jack who really make me want to waste, er … spend, lots more time reading TTAC than I probably should.

Sajeev answers:

On behalf of myself and Jack, thank you for the kind words! And yes, you should easily break 20 mpg while cruising in the 65-70 mph range. I’ve done it in several 4.6-liter Panthers on highway runs, even high-mileage examples like yours.

Fuel economy issues are usually from common wear items needing attention, especially at your Grand Marquis’ age and mileage.

Did you do a tune up after buying? You should replace spark plugs, wires, PCV, air and fuel filter, then inspect all vacuum lines for leaks (i.e. gooey or brittle rubber hoses), and don’t forget the rubber elbows/T-fittings. Pop off the EGR valve and clean the carbon off both the valve and the corresponding intake manifold orifices. It’s also possible your fuel injectors are toast. You can get an inspected/cleaned set for $100-ish on eBay. One or all of these things will likely solve the problem.

And just to make sure we overlooked nothing, have you (or the previous owner) done the plastic intake manifold replacement? If not, do yourself a solid and do all the above when you yank off the original intake.

[Image: Shutterstock user iQoncept]

Send your queries to sajeev@thetruthaboutcars.com. Spare no details and ask for a speedy resolution if you’re in a hurry…but be realistic, and use your make/model specific forums instead of TTAC for more timely advice.

Sajeev Mehta
Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 48 comments
  • Jagboi Jagboi on Apr 14, 2016

    I'd want to check the thermostat to make sure it's not stuck open, and change air filter and O2 sensors. It should be able to get better mileage than it is.

    • See 1 previous
    • Jimbob457 Jimbob457 on Apr 18, 2016

      @Scoutdude Check your odometer against a measured mile.

  • Compaq Deskpro Compaq Deskpro on Apr 20, 2016

    I got a ~24 MPG highway, 27 if I stuck religiously to 55, out of my 03.

  • Analoggrotto Kia Tasman is waiting to offer the value quotient to the discerning consumer and those who have provided healthy loyalty numbers thinks to class winning product such as Telluride, Sorento, Sportage and more. Vehicles like this overpriced third world junker are for people who take out massive loans and pay it down for 84 months while Kia buyers of grand affluence choose shorter lease terms to stay fresh and hip with the latest excellence of HMC.
  • SCE to AUX That terrible fuel economy hardly seems worth the premium for the hybrid.Toyota is definitely going upmarket with the new Tacoma; we'll see if they've gone too far for people's wallets.As for the towing capacity - I don't see a meaningful difference between 6800 lbs and 6000 lbs. If you routinely tow that much, you should probably upgrade your vehicle to gain a little margin.As for the Maverick - I doubt it's being cross-shopped with the Tacoma very much. Its closest competitor seems to be the Santa Cruz.
  • Rochester Give me the same deal on cars comparable to the new R3, and I'll step up. That little R3 really appeals to me.
  • Carson D It will work out exactly the way it did the last time that the UAW organized VW's US manufacturing operations.
  • Carson D A friend of mine bought a Cayenne GTS last week. I was amazed how small the back seat is. Did I expect it to offer limousine comfort like a Honda CR-V? I guess not. That it is far more confining and uncomfortable than any 4-door Civic made in the past 18 years was surprising. It reminded me of another friend's Mercedes-Benz CLS550 from a dozen years ago. It seems like a big car, but really it was a 2+2 with the utilitarian appearance of a 4-door sedan. The Cayenne is just an even more utilitarian looking 2+2. I suppose the back seat is bigger than the one in the Porsche my mother drove 30 years ago. The Cayenne's luggage bay is huge, but Porsche's GTs rarely had problems there either.
Next