Sensible Shoes: Buy the Yukon Denali That Doesn't Look Like a Yukon Denali

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

Strange as it seems to those of us who clearly remember 16-inch wheels as the sporting option on midsize sedans, 20-inch rims on a 2016 GMC Yukon Denali appear downright tiny.

Indeed, the 20-inchers pictured above are the poverty-spec wheels on the Yukon Denali, a simple way of avoiding a set of $2,495-2,995 22-inch wheels that will — and here’s the kicker — make your Yukon Denali distinctly less comfortable.

Substance over style. Propriety in place of panache. Grace instead of grandeur. From a dynamic standpoint, the 2016 GMC Yukon Denali on 20-inch rims that we tested a few weeks ago was noticeably superior to the 2015 GMC Yukon Denali we tested the previous winter, a vehicle shod with 22-inch wheels which now cost, according to GMC.com, $2,995.

This year’s Yukon Denali tester was all gaping wheel arches and blackwall; this is the Yukon Denali of choice for police departments if police departments bought Yukon Denalis instead of Tahoes; the Yukon Denali that makes people wonder if it’s really a Denali or just a Yukon SLE with $1,400 optional 20s; an emasculated SUV that not-so-proudly announces to the world that you shelled out near-Escalade money for a Tahoe but couldn’t find a few more dimes and nickels behind the couch cushions to properly option it up to typical Denali standards.

This Yukon may be better prepared to deal with the rigors of daily life on the rugged coastal roads of Nova Scotia, but the smaller wheels means we sputtered through the city of Halifax unnoticed, a stark contrast to the eye-catching 2015 Yukon on its dashing, upsized, 7-spoke 22s. Even in understated black paint, that 22-inch-clad (285/45R22 tires) 2015 Yukon Denali incited innumerable second glances, prompted plenty of “How much is it?” queries, and caused Buick Encores to quiver in the right lane, embarrassed to have ever called itself an SUV.

Northerners who spend half the year driving around in red Corolla S sedans on black steelies are surely aghast at the thought of spending an additional $2,995 on a $70,015 full-size SUV just to abide by modern society’s automotive edicts. But style matters in certain sectors more than others, and the upmarket image which is supposed to be conveyed by moving up from Tahoe to Yukon to Yukon Denali — and eventually to Escalade — is largely rescinded if the Yukon Denali appears to be wearing GMC’s version of the Corolla’s black steelies: 10-spoke 20-inch ultra-bright machined aluminum wheels.

But the “small” wheels sure do make the Yukon Denali a far more luxurious vehicle. I won’t disagree with my Simon And Garfunkel-inspired TTAC review of the bigger-wheeled ‘15 Yukon Denali — “the Yukon Denali ignores the worst pavement” — because even the bigger-wheeled Yukon Denali with its wonderfully stout structure manages to beat the most offensive roads into submission. But magnetic ride control works hard to make it so, and there’s always an awareness that the suspension is busily at work analyzing asphalt, studying surfaces, and calculating concrete consistency.

The same can be said of the Cadillac Escalade I tested late last year. It’s not that the ride quality is poor, rather that a vehicle designed to cosset a large number of occupants should better balance the need of looking expensive with the job of providing a magic carpet experience.

Shod with the Yukon’s most basic 20-inch rims (275/55R20 tires) and still equipped with magnetic ride control, the 2016 GMC Yukon Denali becomes downright imperturbable. The worst section of local road is less than a mile from my house, where a fire hydrant erupted a few months ago and the road needed perpetual repaving in the dead of winter. Since it bubbled and burst and caved in on itself, this patch job causes our own Odyssey’s sliding doors to groan, the Audi Q3 ( about which I recently voiced serious wheel complaints) to suffer an anxiety attack upon approach, and the rear end of last week’s Ford F-150 to jiggle about as though it’s auditioning for Drake’s next video.

The Yukon just didn’t care. Yes, there was an awareness of effort being expended if, and only if, you paid close attention. But the very stretch of road that manifests the structural shortcomings of so many other vehicles highlights the impressive work done on the Yukon’s suspension, a trait revealed here because the Yukon has an appropriate amount of unsprung weight.

Exemplary ride quality doesn’t hide the Yukon Denali’s unrelated shortcomings. The interior doesn’t live up to the highfalutin’ price point. Second row legroom is pitiful for a vehicle of this size, or even a vehicle much smaller than the Yukon. The height of the cargo load floor is a joke. No, seriously. My athletic 70-pound dog — who’s rarely permitted in manufacturer-supplied press cars but yearns to plaster them all with hair and mud — was granted an opportunity to jump in the back of the Yukon. She looked at me, looked at the Yukon, looked at me again, and walked away. “You’ve gotta be kidding,” she said, or at least that’s what the angle of her ears intimated.

On the flip side, a stellar powertrain (6.2-liter V8 with 420 horsepower and an eight-speed automatic) produces stunning acceleration figures. Moreover, even real world urban fuel consumption, 17 miles per gallon, is perfectly tolerable given the Yukon Denali’s obscene power and range of capabilities.

Alas, the snug second- and third-row seats create an interior too snug for the demands of my family. But the Yukon is a handsome, powerful, comfortable, imposing brute of an SUV that’s undeniably appealing to legions of buyers.

Curiously, one of the best ways to make the Yukon Denali better is to not spend more money. Stacked up against a Yukon Denali on 22s, this Yukon Denali doesn’t look tough enough or rich enough. But this Yukon is better than that Yukon, and that should simply be enough.

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 95 comments
  • Eyeflyistheeye Eyeflyistheeye on Apr 19, 2016

    If I'm getting a GMTK2XX, it's a Tahoe LT. No lower, no higher. EDIT: Damn, $49k for a Tahoe LT on TrueCar? I'm buying slightly used if I have to go full-size SUV.

  • 09box 09box on Apr 21, 2016

    The bigger rims just look awful and the price of replacing one of those rims and tires from a busting it on a pothole is going to be more awful.

  • 1995 SC Wife has a new Ridgeline and it came with 2 years so I don't have to think about it for a while.My FIAT needed a battery (the 12V...not the drive battery), a replacement steering column cover and I had to buy a Tesla Charging adapter to use the destination charger at one of the places I frequent. Also had to replace the charge cable because I am an idiot and ran the stock one over and destroyed the connector. Around 600 bucks all in there but 250 is because of the cable.The Thunderbird has needed much the past year. ABS Pump - 300. Master Cylinder 100. Tool to bleed ABS 350 (Welcome to pre OBD2 electronics), Amp for Stereo -250, Motor mounts 150, Injectors 300, Airbag Module - 15 at the u pull it, Belts and hoses, 100 - Plugs and wires 100, Trans fluid, filter and replacement pan, 150, ignition lock cylinder and rekey - 125, Cassette Player mechanism - 15 bucks at the U Pull it, and a ton of time to do things like replace the grease in the power seat motots (it was hard and the seats wouldn't move when cold), Rear pinion seal - 15 buckjs, Fix a million broken tabs in the dash surround, recap the ride control module and all. My wife would say more, but my Math has me around 2 grand. Still needs an exhaust manifold gasket and the drivers side window acts up from time to time. I do it all but if I were paying someone that would be rough. It's 30 this year though so I roll with it. You'll have times like these running old junk.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Besides for the sake of emissions I don’t understand why the OEM’s went with small displacement twin turbo engines in heavy trucks. Like you guys stated above there really isn’t a MPG advantage. Plus that engine is under stress pulling that truck around then you hit it with turbos, more rpm’s , air, fuel, heat. My F-150 Ecoboost 3.5 went through one turbo replacement and the other was leaking. l’ll stick with my 2021 V8 Tundra.
  • Syke What I'll never understand about economics reporting: $1.1 billion net income is a mark of failure? Anyone with half a brain recognizes that Tesla is slowly settling in to becoming just another EV manufacturer, now that the legacy manufacturers have gained a sense of reality and quit tripping over their own feet in converting their product lines. Who is stupid enough to believe that Tesla is going to remain 90% of the EV market for the next ten years?Or is it just cheap headlines to highlight another Tesla "problem"?
  • Rna65689660 I had an AMG G-Wagon roar past me at night doing 90 - 100. What a glorious sound. This won’t get the same vibe.
  • Marc Muskrat only said what he needed to say to make the stock pop. These aren't the droids you're looking for. Move along.
Next