EPA Ends Bid to Further Justify Itself

Seth Parks
by Seth Parks

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is dropping proposed policy language that would have done, well, nothing.

That’s right, and it would have made a great Seinfeld story line: faceless bumbling government agency seeks to reframe public debate with a redundant, unenforceable, and unnecessary policy revision only to meet unanticipated wrath from industry and enthusiasts, forcing it to ultimately retract its proposal.

The episode began in June when the EPA published a 600-page proposal focused on reducing carbon emissions for medium- and heavy-duty trucks. A sliver of the policy proposal dealt with prohibiting the modification or removal of emissions equipment when converting on-road vehicles into racecars. Such regulation has long been in place, and has been reaffirmed through legislative action on multiple occasions since passage of the Clean Air Act in 1963.

Predictably, the proposal attracted attention from Specialty Equipment Market Association (SEMA), the mouthpiece for the $36 billion aftermarket. It released a strongly worded response to the proposal in February. A few days later, Motor Trend’s Scott Evans published a well worded, if controversial, editorial that was swiftly removed from MT’s website but lives on in part here. Mr. Evans called into question the purpose of the proposal and called out SEMA as “paranoid and reactionary.” Since then, the EPA has not convincingly articulated the value of its proposed “policy clarification,” but we have a few ideas. The aftermarket, media, and enthusiasts have been up in arms over this for most of 2016.

This week, Congress got in on the action. House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton R-Michigan stated in a letter to EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy, “We remain doubtful that this proposed policy change complies with Congressional intent.”

Perhaps scrutiny from the legislative branch was the last straw, because the EPA subsequently announced removal of the controversial language. According to Automotive News, the EPA released a statement, “Since our attempt to clarify led to confusion, EPA has decided to eliminate the proposed language from the final rule.”

The episode ends much as it began, with a policy debate about as substantive as the contents of George Costanza’s Penske File.

[Image: TexasGOPVote.com/Flickr]

Seth Parks
Seth Parks

Twenty year auto industry professional. Currently CEO at Turbo International, the premier American manufacturer of OEM replacement turbochargers for the global aftermarket.

More by Seth Parks

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 21 comments
  • Ronnie Schreiber Ronnie Schreiber on Apr 16, 2016

    SEMA is still lobbying for the passage of the RPM bill, which would statutorily restrict the EPA from regulating vehicles modified for off-road use, including racing. There once was a concept of enabling legislation. Since the bureaucratic leviathan seems unrestrained by little things like actual laws (see the Dept of Education's "Dear Colleague" letter that the agency admits has no basis in law but has created hysteria, word choice intended, about a non-existent epidemic of sexual assault on campus), it is now necessary to pass restricting legislation to make it clear to the executive branch that they can't just do whatever they want to do.

    • See 1 previous
    • JimInRadfordVA JimInRadfordVA on Apr 18, 2016

      @redav You think the EPA is bad at this? Try the BATF.

  • Laserwizard Laserwizard on Apr 18, 2016

    Any money saved will be used to prosecute man-made, western-based climate change deniers and to throw them in jail. Or the money will be used to buy 1/20th of the next designer dress that Moochelle My Belle wears showing how she relates to us little people.

  • Analoggrotto Kia EV9 was voted the best vehicle in the world and this is the best TOYOTA can do? Nice try, next.
  • 3-On-The-Tree 4cyl as well.
  • Luke42 I want more information about Ford’s Project T3.The Silverado EV needs some competition beyond just the Rivian truck. The Cybertruck has missed the mark.The Cybertruck is special in that it’s the first time Tesla has introduced an uncompetitive EV. I hope the company learns from their mistakes. While Tesla is learning what they did wrong, I’ll be shopping to replace my GMC Sierra Hybrid with a Chevy, a Ford, or a Rivian — all while happily driving my Model Y.
  • 3-On-The-Tree I wished they wouldn’t go to the twin turbo V6. That’s why I bought a 2021 Tundra V8.
  • Oberkanone My grid hurts!Good luck with installing charger locations at leased locations with aging infrastructure. Perhaps USPS would have better start modernizing it's Post offices to meet future needs. Of course, USPS has no money for anything.
Next